Contemporary Justice Review最新文献_第10页

Prosecutorial reform from within: district attorney ‘Disruptors’ and other change agents, 2016–2020 内部检察改革：地区检察官“破坏者”和其他变革推动者，2016年至2020年

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1783255

Jennifer M. Balboni, Randall Grometstein

{"title":"Prosecutorial reform from within: district attorney ‘Disruptors’ and other change agents, 2016–2020","authors":"Jennifer M. Balboni, Randall Grometstein","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2020.1783255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2020.1783255","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prior to 2016, the push for prosecutorial reform came from many different corners: legislators, nonprofits, and the larger community discontented with the justice system. In many ways, Trump’s campaign and election may have accelerated efforts to reform District Attorney offices across the country. With 51 decidedly progressive candidates winning office since 2016, it’s clear there is momentum for substantive change. Through an examination of policy statements and media coverage, this paper will examine the qualitative research question of what the scope of the District Attorney reform movement is; we posit a continuum of reformers, from the ‘disruptor’ (who wants to fundamentally change multiple structural components of the system) to the ‘pruner’ (whose reform intent is more circumscribed). First, we examine the role of the prosecutor, prior efforts at reform, and the federal landscape as it relates to change. We then examine the push for prosecutorial reform – from within – from these newly elected DA’s who have taken office since 2016, and consider their agendas, as well as the headwinds these prosecutors face as they try to make the changes they are promising.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10282580.2020.1783255","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49583103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

‘I see all the life’: designing spaces of respite for survivors of violence “我看到了所有的生活”：为暴力幸存者设计喘息的空间

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1783256

Barb Toews

引用次数: 0

The conditions for progressive rights to bring about social change 进步权利带来社会变革的条件

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1783254

Lin Liu

引用次数: 2

The #MeToo movement and restorative justice: exploring the views of the public #MeToo运动与恢复性司法：探索公众观点

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1783257

Inbal Peleg-Koriat, Carmit Klar-Chalamish

{"title":"The #MeToo movement and restorative justice: exploring the views of the public","authors":"Inbal Peleg-Koriat, Carmit Klar-Chalamish","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2020.1783257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2020.1783257","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study examined ‘the day after’ the #MeToo protest, and proposes channeling the outcry of millions of women toward developing and establishing alternative mechanisms for dealing with sexual offences, focusing on restorative justice conferencing. A mixed-methods design (quantitative and qualitative) was employed to empirically examine the public’s attitude toward the #MeToo movement and restorative-justice in sexual offence cases. The findings (n = 252) revealed that the majority of the public supports the #MeToo movement, but not publications that name alleged offenders. Higher levels of support were found among women and people who define themselves as sexual offence victims. A positive correlation was found between support for the #MeToo movement and support for restorative-justice in sexual offence cases. To better understand the quantitative findings, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 participants. Analysis of the interviews showed that the public acknowledges the importance of the movement, especially due to the widespread discussion on sexual offences and their implications, giving voice to victims, and the possibility that this will help their coping and healing process. Similarly, proponents of restorative justice view the process as an opportunity to conduct a meaningful dialogue, allowing victims to sound their voice and act in a way that suits them.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10282580.2020.1783257","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43717462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Possibilities of prison-based restorative justice: transformation beyond recidivism 以监狱为基础的恢复性司法的可能性:超越累犯的改造

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1783258

Karen Ross, Denise Muro

引用次数: 5

Responding to hate incidents on university campuses: benefits and barriers to establishing a restorative justice programme 应对大学校园仇恨事件：建立恢复性司法方案的好处和障碍

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-05-18 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1762492

Liyana Kayali, M. Walters

{"title":"Responding to hate incidents on university campuses: benefits and barriers to establishing a restorative justice programme","authors":"Liyana Kayali, M. Walters","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2020.1762492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2020.1762492","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examines staff and student perspectives of the use of restorative justice approaches to respond to student-on-student hate crime, hate incidents, and hate speech on university campuses. It draws on qualitative data collated over a one-year period, during the design and establishment of a restorative programme entitled ‘Restore Respect’ at two UK universities. Highlighting examples of students’ experiences of prejudice and hate across the two universities, we outline some of the key barriers to reporting associated with conventional university responses, as well as staff and student views of establishing a new restorative approach to addressing incidents. While early-stage evaluation revealed certain cultural and institutional barriers and limitations to the establishment and operation of a restorative programme, the majority of staff and students viewed it as an effective way of addressing hate-based conduct that would provide greater opportunity for more positive interventions and outcomes. The paper concludes by arguing for a renewed effort to move beyond standard institutional responses to student experiences of hate and prejudice at university through the adoption of restorative, needs-centred approaches.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10282580.2020.1762492","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43691235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Institutionalising restorative justice in the police: key findings from a study of two English police forces 警察恢复性司法制度化：对两支英国警察部队的研究的关键发现

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-05-13 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1755847

I. Marder

引用次数: 18

The other side of assimilation: how immigrants are changing American life 同化的另一面：移民如何改变美国人的生活

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-04-28 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1761230

D. Piacenti

引用次数: 0

Discerning justice: clarifying the role of procedural and interactional justice in restorative conferencing 辨别正义：阐明程序正义和互动正义在恢复性会议中的作用

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-04-26 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1755843

Heather L. Scheuerman, Talia N. Gilbert, Shelley Keith, Karen A. Hegtvedt

引用次数: 1

Lethal leverage: false confessions, false pleas, and wrongful homicide convictions in death-eligible cases 致命杠杆:在可判死刑的案件中，虚假供词、虚假抗辩和错误的杀人罪

Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-04-26 DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2020.1755845

Karcin Vick, K. Cook, Meghan L. Rogers

{"title":"Lethal leverage: false confessions, false pleas, and wrongful homicide convictions in death-eligible cases","authors":"Karcin Vick, K. Cook, Meghan L. Rogers","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2020.1755845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2020.1755845","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Substantial attention to wrongful convictions has been developing since the 1990s. This research examines known cases of exonerations and factors that contribute to known wrongful convictions. The issues explored include false confessions, false guilty pleas, and death jurisdiction that impact known wrongful homicide convictions. Literature shows that false confessions can affect relationships with defense attorneys, jury perceptions, other evidentiary analyses, and sentencing outcomes. This research measures the effect of death-eligibility on false confessions and guilty pleas and how those admissions of guilt affect the likelihood of receiving a death sentence. Using data from the National Registry of Exonerations, we estimate probabilities of false confessions, guilty pleas, and death sentences based on multiple predictor variables. Results reveal three major findings. First, African Americans accused of homicide in known wrongful conviction cases, where the homicide victims were mostly female, where false and misleading forensic evidence and official misconduct were present, are statistically most likely to have falsely confessed. Second, guilty pleas were mostly likely produced in death-eligible jurisdictions, net of control factors. And third, death sentences were most likely to have been imposed on male exonerees where the homicide victims were mostly female, where official misconduct was present, and who had falsely confessed.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10282580.2020.1755845","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42864809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0