CMAJ open最新文献

{"title":"Correction to \"A population-based study of the direct longitudinal health care costs of upper extremity trauma in patients aged 18-65 years\".","authors":"","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20230024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20230024","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 1","pages":"E169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933988/pdf/cmajo.20230024.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9250998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric asthma-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions in Montréal, Quebec: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Khadidja Chelabi,&nbsp;Esli Osmanlliu,&nbsp;Jocelyn Gravel,&nbsp;Olivier Drouin,&nbsp;Sze Man Tse","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is a chronic respiratory condition that affects 10% of Canadian children and is often exacerbated by viral respiratory infections, prompting concerns about the severity of SARS-CoV-2 disease in children with asthma. We compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of children presenting to the emergency department and the incidence of these visits, before and during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included children aged 0 to 17 years presenting with asthma to 2 tertiary pediatric emergency departments in Montréal, Quebec, between the prepandemic (Jan. 1, 2017, to Mar. 31, 2020) and pandemic (Apr. 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021) periods. We compared the number of emergency department visits and hospital admissions with an interrupted time series analysis and compared the sociodemographic characteristics based on the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (CIMD) and clinical characteristics (including triage level, intensive care admissions, etc.) with Mann-Whitney and χ² tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We examined 22 746 asthma-related emergency department visits. During the pandemic, a greater proportion of patients presented a triage level 1 or 2 (19.3% v. 14.7%) and were admitted to the intensive care unit (2.5% v. 1.3%). The patients' CIMD quintile distributions did not differ between the 2 periods. We found a 47% decrease (relative risk [RR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37 to 0.76) in emergency department visits and a 49% decrease (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76) in hospital admissions during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The decrease in asthma-related emergency department visits was observed through the third wave of the pandemic, but children presented with a higher acuity and with no identified sociodemographic changes. Future studies are required to understand individual behaviours that may have led to the increased acuity at presentation observed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 1","pages":"E152-E159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/89/cmajo.20220072.PMC9933991.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9250999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Inclusion of patient-level emergency department characteristics to classify potentially redirectable visits to subacute care: a modified Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Ryan P Strum,&nbsp;Walter Tavares,&nbsp;Andrew Worster,&nbsp;Lauren E Griffith,&nbsp;Andrew P Costa","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients transported by Ontario paramedics to the emergency department have non-emergent conditions and may be more appropriately served by subacute community-based care centres. We sought to determine consensus on a set of patient characteristics that could be useful to classify retrospective emergency department visits that had a high probability of being primary care-like and potentially redirectable to a subacute care centre by paramedics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a modified Delphi study to assess expert consensus on characteristics of patients transported by paramedics to the emergency department from August to October 2021. An expert Delphi committee was constructed of emergency and family physicians in Ontario using purposive sampling. Experts rated whether each characteristic was useful to be included in a classification to identify potentially redirectable visits retrospectively, as well as characteristic details (e.g., upper and lower bounds). Consensus was considered 75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen experts participated in the study; the experts were mostly male (75%) and evenly divided between emergency and family medicine. After 2 rounds, consensus was achieved on 8 of 9 characteristics (89%). Four characteristics were determined as useful to classify potentially redirectable emergency department visits: age (81%), triage acuity (100%), specialist consult in the emergency department (94%) and emergency department visit outcome (81%). Specifications of each characteristic were refined as follows: young and middle-aged adults with a non-emergent triage acuity, did not receive a specialist physician consult in the emergency department and discharged from the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Strong consensus was achieved to specify a classification system for potentially redirectable emergency department visits. These results will be combined with knowledge of which subacute care centres could conduct the main physician interventions to retrospectively identify emergency department visits that could have been suitable for paramedic redirection for further research.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ID ISRCTN22901977.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 1","pages":"E70-E76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/b5/cmajo.20220062.PMC9876581.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9619482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Time of coronary revascularization: methodology of a mediation analysis study.","authors":"Boris Sobolev, Lisa Kuramoto","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210183","DOIUrl":"10.9778/cmajo.20210183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advantage of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), established in trials, may not be generalizable to populations in which the method of treatment determines the time to treatment. We sought to describe the methodology of a population-based observational study for assessing how changes in time to treatment may affect the comparative effectiveness of these 2 methods of coronary revascularization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose a framework of causal mediation analysis to compare the outcomes of choosing CABG over PCI, if patients selected for either method waited the same amount of time had they undergone a PCI. We will include patients who underwent a first-time, nonurgent isolated CABG or single-session PCI for multivessel or left main coronary artery disease from January 2001 to December 2016, in British Columbia. We will use absolute risk difference as a measure of the total effect of choosing CABG over PCI and partition it into the direct effect of the treatment choice and the effect mediated by the treatment-specific timing.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Understanding how time to treatment mediates the relation between method of revascularization and outcomes will have implications for treatment selection, resource allocation and planning benchmarks. Findings on the benefits and risks of performing PCI or CABG within a certain time will guide multidisciplinary teams in determining the appropriate revascularization method for individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"10 4","pages":"E1052-E1058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/cf/cmajo.20210183.PMC9828946.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9605383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake and reasons for hesitancy among Canadian pregnant people: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Jessica Gorgui, Anthony Atallah, Isabelle Boucoiran, Yessica-Haydee Gomez, Anick Bérard","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210273","DOIUrl":"10.9778/cmajo.20210273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been developed and approved at an unparalleled speed. Given that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are recommended to pregnant people, our aim was to quantify vaccination uptake, and describe vaccination hesitancy and behavioural attitudes surrounding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CONCEPTION study is an ongoing international study started in June 2020, evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health of pregnant people and their children. For this study, pregnant people recruited from Apr. 20, 2021, to Feb. 8, 2022, and residing in Canada were invited to complete a Web-based survey. In addition to all CONCEPTION variables, data on vaccine uptake as well as personal knowledge of COVID-19 severity in pregnancy and of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine safety and efficacy were collected. Marginal risk differences and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess determinants of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From Apr. 20, 2021, to Feb. 8, 2022, 603 pregnant people were recruited and gave consent, of which 83.7% (<i>n</i> = 505) were vaccinated and 16.3% (<i>n</i> = 98) were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Uptake of the influenza vaccine in 2020/21 was a significant predictor of being vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 or intention to be vaccinated (marginal risk difference 3.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0% to 3.3%, adjusted OR 4.43, 95% CI 2.32 to 9.25), and being employed (marginal risk difference 11.2%, 95% CI 10.6% to 11.9%, adjusted OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.35) increased the likelihood of being vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Self-assessed knowledge of COVID-19 severity and vaccine efficacy was not associated with vaccine uptake.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among the Canadian pregnant people who responded to this study, vaccine uptake against SARS-CoV-2 was high. However, our results underscore the importance of improving knowledge transfer about the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnancy to guide vaccination efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"10 4","pages":"E1034-E1043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8b/45/cmajo.20210273.PMC9744265.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9305169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Continuity of physician care over the last year of life for different cause-of-death categories: a retrospective population-based study.","authors":"Michelle Howard, Abe Hafid, Colleen Webber, Sarina R Isenberg, Ana Gayowsky, Aaron Jones, Mary Scott, Amy T Hsu, Katrin Conen, James Downar, Doug Manuel, Peter Tanuseputro","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210294","DOIUrl":"10.9778/cmajo.20210294","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mix of care provided by family physicians, specialists and palliative care physicians can vary by the illnesses leading to death, which may result in disruptions of continuity of care at the end of life. We measured continuity of outpatient physician care in the last year of life across differing causes of death and assessed factors associated with higher continuity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of adults who died in Ontario between 2013 and 2018, using linked provincial health administrative data. We calculated 3 measures of continuity (usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity), which range from 0 to 1, from outpatient physician visits over the last year of life for terminal illness, organ failure, frailty, sudden death and other causes of death. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between characteristics and a continuity score of 0.5 or greater.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 417 628 decedents, we found that mean usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity indices were 0.37, 0.30 and 0.37, respectively, with continuity being the lowest for those with terminal illness (0.27, 0.23 and 0.33, respectively). Higher number of comorbidities, higher neighbourhood income quintile and all non-sudden death categories were associated with lower continuity.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We found that continuity of physician care in the last year of life was low, especially in those with cancer. Further research is needed to validate measures of continuity against end-of-life health care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":" ","pages":"E971-E980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/1f/cmajo.20210294.PMC9648626.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40672624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Salivary testing for SARS-CoV-2 in the pediatric population: a diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Nadia Hua,&nbsp;Martin Corsten,&nbsp;Alexander Bello,&nbsp;Maala Bhatt,&nbsp;Rachael Milwid,&nbsp;David Champredon,&nbsp;Patricia Turgeon,&nbsp;Roger Zemek,&nbsp;Lauren Dawson,&nbsp;Nicholas Mitsakakis,&nbsp;Richard Webster,&nbsp;Lisa Caulley,&nbsp;Jonathan B Angel,&nbsp;Nathalie Bastien,&nbsp;Guillaume Poliquin,&nbsp;Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and timely testing for SARS-CoV-2 in the pediatric population is crucial to control the COVID-19 pandemic; saliva testing has been proposed as a less invasive alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs. We sought to compare the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using saliva versus nasopharyngeal swab in the pediatric population, and to determine the optimum time of testing for SARS-CoV-2 using saliva.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal diagnostic study in Ottawa, Canada, from Jan. 19 to Mar. 26, 2021. Children aged 3-17 years were eligible if they exhibited symptoms of COVID-19, had been identified as a high-risk or close contact to someone confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2 or had travelled outside Canada in the previous 14 days. Participants provided both nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples. Saliva was collected using a self-collection kit (DNA Genotek, OM-505) or a sponge-based kit (DNA Genotek, ORE-100) if they could not provide a saliva sample into a tube.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1580 paired nasopharyngeal and saliva tests, 60 paired samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Forty-four (73.3%) were concordant-positive results and 16 (26.6%) were discordant, among which 8 were positive only on nasopharyngeal swab and 8 were positive only on saliva testing. The sensitivity of saliva was 84.6% (95% confidence interval 71.9%-93.1%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Salivary testing for SARS-CoV-2 in the pediatric population is less invasive and shows similar detection of SARS-CoV-2 to nasopharyngeal swabs. It may therefore provide a feasible alternative for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":" ","pages":"E981-E987"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/15/cmajo.20210279.PMC9648623.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40672626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Association between Goals of Care Designation orders and health care resource use among seriously ill older adults in acute care: a multicentre prospective cohort study.","authors":"Madalene A Earp,&nbsp;Konrad Fassbender,&nbsp;Seema King,&nbsp;Maureen Douglas,&nbsp;Patricia Biondo,&nbsp;Amanda Brisebois,&nbsp;Sara N Davison,&nbsp;Winnie Sia,&nbsp;Eric Wasylenko,&nbsp;LeAnn Esau,&nbsp;Jessica Simon","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Goals of Care Designation (GCD) is a medical order used to communicate the focus of a patient's care in Alberta, Canada. In this study, we aimed to determine the association between GCD type (resuscitative, medical or comfort) and resource use during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study of newly hospitalized inpatients in Alberta conducted from January to September 2017. Participants were aged 55 years or older with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, cancer or renal failure; aged 55-79 years and their provider answered \"no\" to the \"surprise question\" (i.e., provider would not be surprised if the patient died in the next 6 months); or aged 80 years or older with any acute condition. The exposure of interest was GCD. The primary outcome was health care resource use during admission, measured by length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit hours, Resource Intensity Weights (RIWs), flagged interventions and palliative care referral. The secondary outcome was 30-day readmission. Adjusted regression analyses were performed (adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, Clinical Frailty Scale score, comorbidities and city).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 475 study participants. The median age was 83 (interquartile range 77-87) years, and 93.7% had a GCD at enrolment. Relative to patients with the resuscitative GCD type, patients with the medical GCD type had a longer LOS (1.42 times, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.83) and a higher RIW (adjusted ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28). Patients with the comfort and medical GCD types had more palliative care referral (comfort GCD adjusted relative risk (RR) 9.32, 95% CI 4.32-20.08; medical GCD adjusted RR 3.58, 95% CI 1.75-7.33) but not flagged intervention use (comfort GCD adjusted RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.49-2.28; medical GCD adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.48-2.02) or 30-day readmission (comfort GCD adjusted RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.19; medical GCD adjusted RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.20).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Goals of Care Designation type early during admission was associated with LOS, RIW and palliative care referral. This suggests an alignment between health resource use and the focus of care communicated by each GCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":" ","pages":"E945-E955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/06/cmajo.20210155.PMC9633054.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40660975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Health care utilization differences between First Nations people and the general population with inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective cohort study from Saskatchewan, Canada.","authors":"José Diego Marques Santos,&nbsp;Sharyle Fowler,&nbsp;Derek Jennings,&nbsp;Colten Brass,&nbsp;Linda Porter,&nbsp;Robert Porter,&nbsp;Rhonda Sanderson,&nbsp;Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indigenous people in Canada often face barriers to access specialized care, with limited data in evaluating health care utilization among Indigenous people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to compare health care utilization between First Nations patients and those in the general population diagnosed with IBD in Saskatchewan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a patient-oriented, population-based, retrospective cohort study by linking administrative health databases of Saskatchewan between fiscal years 1998/99 and 2017/18. We designed and completed this study in partnership with Indigenous patients and family advocates. We applied a validated algorithm to identify IBD incident cases and then used the self-declared First Nations status variable to divide those cases. We applied a 1:5 ratio for age and sex matching and used Cox proportional models to assess associations. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We created a matched cohort with 696 IBD incident cases: 116 First Nations patients and 580 patients in the general population. We observed differences between the groups for IBD-specific hospital admissions (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.75), IBD-related hospital admissions (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-2.01), medication claims for IBD (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41-0.65) and 5-aminosalicylic acid claims (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.71) adjusting by rural or urban residence and diagnosis type. There were no significant differences in the hazard rate of outpatient gastroenterology visits (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.41), colonoscopies (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.41) and surgeries for IBD (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.64).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We identified that First Nations patients diagnosed with IBD had a higher rate of hospital admissions owing to IBD than patients in the general population diagnosed with IBD. We also found an inverse association between First Nations status and having prescription medication claims for IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":" ","pages":"E964-E970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e3/0c/cmajo.20220118.PMC9633056.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40674834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prostate cancer incidence among immigrant men in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Aisha K Lofters,&nbsp;Jacqueline L Bender,&nbsp;Sarah Swayze,&nbsp;Shabbir Alibhai,&nbsp;Anthony Henry,&nbsp;Kenneth Noel,&nbsp;Geetanjali D Datta","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer incidence has been associated with various sociodemographic factors, such as race, income and age, but the association with immigrant status in Canada is unclear. In this population-based study in Ontario, Canada, we compared age-standardized incidence rates for immigrant males from various regions of origin with the rates of long-term residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we linked several provincial-level databases available at ICES, an independent, non-profit research institute. We included all males aged 20 years and older in the province of Ontario eligible for health care for each fiscal year (Apr. 1 to Mar. 31) in 2008-2016. We determined age-standardized prostate cancer incidence rates, stratifying by immigrant status (a binary variable) and region of origin. We used a log-binomial model to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios, with long-term residents (Canadian-born Ontarians as well as those who immigrated before 1985, when available data on immigration starts) as the reference group. We included age, neighbourhood income and time since landing in the models. Additional models limited to immigrant males in the cohort included immigration admission category (economic class, family class, refugee, other) and time since landing in Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 74594 incident cases of prostate cancer in the study period, 6742 of which were among immigrant males. Males who had immigrated from West Africa and the Caribbean had significantly higher incidence of prostate cancer than other immigrants and long-term residents: adjusted rate ratios of 2.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.41-3.05) and 1.91 (95% CI 1.78-2.04), respectively. Immigrants from other regions, including East Africa and Middle-Southern Africa, had lower or similar incidence rates to long-term residents. Males from South Asia had the lowest adjusted rate ratio (0.47, 95% CI 0.45-0.50).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The age-standardized incidence rate of prostate cancer from 2008 to 2016 was consistently and significantly higher among immigrants from West African and Caribbean countries than among other immigrants and long-term residents of the province. Future research in Canada should focus on further understanding heterogeneity in prostate cancer risk and epidemiology, including stage of diagnosis and mortality, for immigrants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":" ","pages":"E956-E963"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/6e/cmajo.20220069.PMC9633052.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40660976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}