In Analysis最新文献_第8页

Complexe d’Œdipe ou de la Captivité ? À propos de l’article « L’anti-Œdipe du point de vue de la philosophie des sciences et des perspectives foucaldiennes du savoir-pouvoir » de J.C. Wakefield 俄狄浦斯情结还是囚禁？关于J.C.韦克菲尔德的文章“从科学哲学的角度和福柯对权力知识的观点看反俄狄浦斯”

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100373

L. Poenaru

引用次数: 0

Psychanalyse et médecine : ce que l’écoute de l’inconscient permet. L’exemple de la résistance thérapeutique dans la fibromyalgie 精神分析与医学：倾听无意识允许什么。纤维肌痛治疗耐药性的例子

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100360

S. Hertzog, L. Razon

{"title":"Psychanalyse et médecine : ce que l’écoute de l’inconscient permet. L’exemple de la résistance thérapeutique dans la fibromyalgie","authors":"S. Hertzog, L. Razon","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2023.100360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inan.2023.100360","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>This article is based on S. Hertzog's doctoral research. It focuses on therapeutic resistance in fibromyalgia, i.e. the lack of pain relief despite a medical treatment. We explore causes and effects of this, through the prism of medical knowledge, but also through the psychoanalytical prism, which can shed light on both the doctor–patient relationship and on the unconscious stakes anchored in the history of the subject.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This article aims to illuminate the ways in which psychoanalysis allows for a singular reading of the dominant discourse in the healthcare system, given the neoliberal context promoting productivity and quantifiable efficiency. Furthermore, the identification and analysis of the unconscious issues emerging in medical care allow us to understand what is at stake in such a context for the patient, who is likewise caught up in the issues of her/his history.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>On the basis of research interviews and content analyses of patients’ discourse, we have explored the different aspects outlined above. In this article we will expose a clinical case.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Our results are based initially on the study and effects of the neoliberal discourse. We have observed that the patient is asked to be autonomous in their choices and responsible for their behavior, while the healthcare system disarms the subject from the symbolic, structuring laws of the Other (heteronomy). The second part of our results allows us to focus on the question of the subject, specifically in relationship to illness and to the doctor, but also her/his demand for subjective appreciation, which is deeply rooted in a conflictual past, specifically in terms of identity.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation/conclusion</h3><p>Our interpretation underlines how the individual deals with the social discourse that impacts the subject of the unconscious. In this sense, the psychoanalytical approach enriches our understanding of the effects of social and medical discourses, linked to the unconscious “stage”.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50199078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Anthropophagy and the human flesh in psychoanalysis 精神分析中的人噬与人的肉体

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100365

Alessandra Affortunati Martins

{"title":"Anthropophagy and the human flesh in psychoanalysis","authors":"Alessandra Affortunati Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2023.100365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inan.2023.100365","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This is an epistemological theoretical analysis that aims to show how the cannibal trope and the flesh are repressed in psychoanalysis.</p></div><div><h3>Context</h3><p>For this, I rescue the discussion that subdivides matriarchy and patriarchy, made by Freud in <em>Moses and Monotheism</em>. There, the abstraction and the negative facet of thought is taken as superior as the body and the sensitive field. In order to show the limits of this vision that marks psychoanalysis almost as a whole, I present reflections made by Oswald de Andrade in his noted essay <em>The crisis of messianic philosophy</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The procedure was the analysis of both texts (<em>Moses and Monotheism</em> and <em>The crisis of messianic philosophy</em>) with the flesh outline as a critic of the patriarchy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Instead of a negative and moral character, as it has been observed in Western culture, Oswald postulates the anthropophagy that devours elements of European culture, without allowing cultural aspects to be colonized. The anthropophagic model marks the culture of the Amerindian peoples, which incorporates aggressiveness and love in a single central gesture in religious and collective rituals that happen among them: anthropophagy.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>The repression of the flesh and of the anthropophagic devouring return impetuously as violence in Western civilization, destroying in an unavoidable way all-civilized pretensions achieved by sublimation processes. The conclusion points to what we should learn from Amerindian models and autarchic cultures: an amalgamation of love and hate that drives to a less destructive cultural forms and to a better relation to nature and to humans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50199081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

La formation des jugements psychanalytiques. À propos de l’article « L’anti-Œdipe du point de vue de la philosophie des sciences et des perspectives foucaldiennes du savoir-pouvoir » de J.C. Wakefield 精神分析判断的形成。关于J.C.韦克菲尔德的文章“从科学哲学的角度和福柯对权力知识的观点看反俄狄浦斯”

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100369

S. Lézé

引用次数: 0

Idées de lecture 阅读思路

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100377

引用次数: 0

Anti-Oedipus from philosophy of science and Foucauldian knowledge-power perspectives 科学哲学与傅知识权力视角下的反俄狄浦斯

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100378

J.C. Wakefield

{"title":"Anti-Oedipus from philosophy of science and Foucauldian knowledge-power perspectives","authors":"J.C. Wakefield","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2023.100378","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inan.2023.100378","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Freud identified his theory of the Oedipus complex<span><span> as his greatest scientific contribution, made it the centerpiece of his clinical theory of the etiology and cure of the psychoneuroses<span>, and adamantly defended it throughout his life. The theory dominated psychoanalysis for almost a century and determined how the problems of countless patients were interpreted. However, recent scholarship suggests that the arguments Freud used to support the theory are unsound and that, far from being harmless pseudoscience, the Oedipal theory constitutes an oppressive form of Foucauldian “knowledge-power” that rearranges </span></span>family relationships in sociosyntonic but emotionally harmful ways. Continued identification of psychoanalysis with Oedipal theory poses an obstacle to fresh psychoanalytic thinking and psychoanalytic credibility. To liberate psychoanalysis from its Oedipal shackles, a clear understanding of the theory's faulty origins and deleterious effects is essential.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives and methods</h3><p>This paper distills the conclusions of two recent books that consider how and why Freud staunchly defended the Oedipal theory and the deleterious effects on the modern family that resulted. After the failure of his seduction theory, Freud developed the Oedipal theory to defend his central theoretical claim, the sexual theory of the neuroses. However, the Oedipal theory remained an entirely ad hoc, scientifically unpersuasive defense without novel evidential support less dependent on psychoanalytic method, which had also been cast into doubt by the seduction theory's failure. Freud attempted to provide such “more direct” evidence in the case of Little Hans, on which my analysis focuses. Regarding the evaluation of Freud's evidence, the method is philosophy-of-science logical reconstruction, analysis, and evaluation of the arguments Freud offered. Regarding the theory's effects, the method is neo-Foucauldian analysis of how acceptance of the theory changed family power relations — that is, the theory's knowledge-power.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>I identify four pivotal arguments Freud presents in the Hans case to support Oedipal theory. Each argument is brilliant as a logical construction but unsound when compared to the evidence of the Hans case history. I then analyze the knowledge-power of the Oedipal theory as it appears in the Hans case as well as in modern family life. Acceptance or awareness of the theory serves to create a sense of danger in mother-son physical affection, leading to separation of children from parents — especially at bedtime — and thus protection of the marital bed in the new era of egalitarian sexual and emotional marriage that started at about the time that the Oedipal theory was proposed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>Freud's arguments defending Oedipal theory are brilliantly conceived, but Freud misreads the facts of the Hans case so tha","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50199077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Œdipe ou le savoir qui condamne 俄狄浦斯或谴责的知识

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100367

Lili Fevre

{"title":"Œdipe ou le savoir qui condamne","authors":"Lili Fevre","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2023.100367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inan.2023.100367","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>This article is a study at the temporal and thematic intersection of the treatment of the myth of Oedipus in theater. It is based on dramatic works from the Antiquity to the contemporary period. This article does not claim to make a relevant contribution to a purely psychological (or psychoanalytic) debate. However, as Jean-Pierre Vernant maintains, dramaturgical study provides a transdisciplinary perspective necessary for reflection.</p></div><div><h3>Goals</h3><p>Echoing the words of Hervé Castanet “Psychoanalysis does not give air to literature - on the contrary, when applied, it stops questions and problems” (himself inspired by Lacan's remarks in “Lituraterre”), this study seeks to highlight the plurality and richness of the questions asked by different playwrights. Based on the words of Christiane Page “we do not know what an author wanted to say, we are faced with what he has written, and the links that are woven between the work and its reception depend as much on its artistic approach as well as the reading which is made of it” we will thus seek to demonstrate the restrictive aspect of the Freudian interpretation of the myth of Oedipus.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This article presents itself as a comparative dramaturgical analysis of the rewritings of the myth, enriched by theoretical contributions from plural disciplinary horizons: philosophical, aesthetic and anthropological.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study of dramatic works allows us to put the Oedipus complex and its myth into perspective. The dramaturgical analysis proposes to go beyond the Freudian understanding of the myth and the character but also acts as a witness to social and societal developments and the impact of the theorization of the complex.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><p>The myth, a tragedy of heredity, goes beyond the complex, depicting an Oedipus victim of destiny and himself and questioning the notion of responsibility. The myth seeks to portray human duality through the representation of an Oedipus with an ambivalent image, going beyond his popular image.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50199082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Psychanalyse, histoire et politique. Un entretien avec Hervé Mazurel et Florent Gabarron-Garcia 精神分析、历史和政治。采访HervéMazurel和Florent Gabarron Garcia

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100375

G. Visentini , H. Mazurel , F. Gabarron-Garcia

引用次数: 0

L’anti-Œdipe du point de vue de la philosophie des sciences et des perspectives foucaldiennes du savoir-pouvoir 从科学哲学和福柯对权力知识的观点来看，反俄狄浦斯

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100372

J.C. Wakefield

{"title":"L’anti-Œdipe du point de vue de la philosophie des sciences et des perspectives foucaldiennes du savoir-pouvoir","authors":"J.C. Wakefield","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2023.100372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inan.2023.100372","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Freud identified his theory of the Oedipus complex as his greatest scientific contribution, made it the centerpiece of his clinical theory of the etiology and cure of the psychoneuroses, and adamantly defended it throughout his life. The theory dominated psychoanalysis for almost a century and determined how the problems of countless patients were interpreted. However, recent scholarship suggests that the arguments Freud used to support the theory are unsound and that, far from being harmless pseudoscience, the Oedipal theory constitutes an oppressive form of Foucauldian “knowledge-power” that rearranges family relationships in sociosyntonic but emotionally harmful ways. Continued identification of psychoanalysis with Oedipal theory poses an obstacle to fresh psychoanalytic thinking and psychoanalytic credibility. To liberate psychoanalysis from its Oedipal shackles, a clear understanding of the theory's faulty origins and deleterious effects is essential.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives and methods</h3><p>This paper distills the conclusions of two recent books that consider how and why Freud staunchly defended the Oedipal theory and the deleterious effects on the modern family that resulted. After the failure of his seduction theory, Freud developed the Oedipal theory to defend his central theoretical claim, the sexual theory of neuroses. However, the Oedipal theory remained an entirely ad hoc, scientifically unpersuasive defense without novel evidential support less dependent on psychoanalytic method, which had also been cast into doubt by the seduction theory's failure. Freud attempted to provide such “more direct” evidence in the case of Little Hans, on which my analysis focuses. Regarding the evaluation of Freud's evidence, the method is philosophy-of-science logical reconstruction, analysis, and evaluation of the arguments Freud offered. Regarding the theory's effects, the method is neo-Foucauldian analysis of how acceptance of the theory changed family power relations — that is, the theory's knowledge-power.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>I identify four pivotal arguments Freud presents in the Hans case to support Oedipal theory. Each argument is brilliant as a logical construction but unsound when compared to the evidence of the Hans case history. I then analyze the knowledge-power of the Oedipal theory as it appears in the Hans case as well as in modern family life. Acceptance or awareness of the theory serves to create a sense of danger in mother-son physical affection, leading to separation of children from parents — especially at bedtime — and thus protection of the marital bed in the new era of egalitarian sexual and emotional marriage that started at about the time that Oedipal theory was proposed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Freud's arguments defending Oedipal theory are brilliantly conceived, but Freud misreads the facts of the Hans case so that his arguments are unsound. In failing to confirm no","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50199074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Anti-Oedipus: Metaphysics and method 反俄狄浦斯：形而上学与方法

In Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2023.100363

Brent Adkins

{"title":"Anti-Oedipus: Metaphysics and method","authors":"Brent Adkins","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2023.100363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inan.2023.100363","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p><span>This article is a philosophical reflection on Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's critique of psychoanalysis and its relation to clinical practice. It draws on Guattari's clinical practice at La Borde as well as his philosophical collaboration with Deleuze, particularly their co-authored work </span><em>Anti-Oedipus</em>. First published in 1972, the book was written in the wake of the May, 1968 upheavels in France and focuses, in particular, on the interconnection between psychoanalysis and capitalism. The author is a philosopher working at the intersection of philosophical history and politics from within a Deleuzian framework. While <em>Anti-Oedipus</em> was seen as the liberatory, theoretical underpinning for some political movements in Europe and South America, it has also been deployed by Accelerationist theorists to intensify capitalist hegemony. Later works by Deleuze and Guattari, such as <em>A Thousand Plateaus</em>, counsel more prudence. This shift in tone has raised interpretive issues, as well as issues of praxis. Thus, while it remains clear that Deleuze and Guattari are arguing for liberation and the creation of the new throughout their work, the means of pursuing this remain underdetermined.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This article has two primary objectives. This first objective is to show that Deleuze and Guattari's critique of Oedipus arises out of Guattari's clinical practice. This critique of Oedipus is in line with Deleuze's critique of the history of philosophy and necessitates the creation of a new metaphysics to ground not only clinical practice but thought in general. The second objective is to show what method Deleuze and Guattari propose for replacing psychoanalysis. A method they call “schizoanalysis.”</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Qualitative. A single case study is used as an illustration and framework to organize the explication of Deleuze and Guattari's argument in <em>Anti-Oedipus</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The critique of psychoanalysis creates space for a new, liberatory praxis. The fundamental principles of schizoanalysis are outlined.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><p>The primary limitation of this study is that it is focused entirely on theoretical foundations. Future work would need to incorporate an analysis of empirical data, not only in relation to the history of La Borde Clinic and its outposts but also of current therapeutic regimes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50199532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0