Endoscopia最新文献

{"title":"Inyección endoscópica de cianoacrilato en la profilaxis primaria y secundaria de várices gástricas en niños","authors":"Plácido Espinosa-Rosas , Guillermina Gómez-Navarro , Ramón Alfredo Castañeda-Ortíz , Rodrigo Alejandro Rodríguez-Izaguirre , Enory Almanza-Miranda","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"28 1","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72067389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Publicaciones de la comunidad endoscópica mexicana, su número, tipo e impacto en la literatura mundial","authors":"Gilberto A. Duarte-Medrano, Félix I. Téllez-Ávila","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2016.02.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"28 1","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.02.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72067394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tratamiento endoscópico de afecciones biliopancreáticas en niños. Análisis de 31 pacientes","authors":"Raúl A. Brizuela Quintanilla , Julián F. Ruiz Torres , Juan Yerandy Ramos Contreras , Jorge García-Menocal Hernández , Norberto Alonso Contino , Samira Becil Poyato , Ramón Villamil Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"28 1","pages":"16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72067388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"En este número","authors":"Enrique Murcio Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"28 1","pages":"Page 1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2016.03.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72067429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparación de 2 tipos de preparación intestinal para la realización de colonoscopia en un hospital de tercer nivel","authors":"M. Castañeda, Oscar Víctor Hernández Mondragón, G. Velasco, J. M. B. Valencia","doi":"10.1016/J.ENDOMX.2015.12.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENDOMX.2015.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"42 1","pages":"168-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85281314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mensaje de la presidenta de la Asociación Mexicana de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, A.C.","authors":"Clara Luz Martínez García","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"250 1","pages":"149-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75756159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Endoscopia alrededor del mundo","authors":"Félix Ignacio Téllez-Ávila","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"27 4","pages":"Pages 188-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72067469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparación de 2 tipos de preparación intestinal para la realización de colonoscopia en un hospital de tercer nivel","authors":"María Lourdes Altamirano Castañeda,&nbsp;Óscar Víctor Hernández Mondragón,&nbsp;Gerardo Blanco Velasco,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Blancas Valencia","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Colonoscopy is the method to evaluate the colon. The preparation with polyethylene glycol (PEG) is used for colonic cleansing. However, tolerability and side effects are common.</p></div><div><h3>Objetive</h3><p>To compare effectiveness through Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleasing Scale (HCS), and tolerability with the visual analog scale in 2 types of colonic preparation: group 1<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->PEG 4<!--> <!-->liters (4L PEG) and group 2<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->30<!--> <!-->ml olive (OL) plus PEG in 2 liters of water (30 OL<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2L PEG).</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Clinical, prospective, randomized, single-center trial. The subjects were randomized into 2 groups: 4L PEG, and 30 OL<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2L PEG. Preparation tolerance was evaluated with visual analog scale and preparation quality with the BBPS and HCS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty two patients were included. Twenty two (52.38%) were included with 4L PEG, and 20 (47.62%), with 30 OL<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2L PEG. 22 (52.38%) were men and 20 (47.62%) were women. The most frequent answer was <em>partial tolerance</em> in 18 (42.9%) and 23 (54.76%) patients, respectively, without statistical significance. The comparison in both preparations, 4L PEG had an average score of 6.04 points, and 30 OL<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2L PEG 6.65 points by BBPS (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.9). HCS was successful in 35 patients (83.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The administration of 30 OL<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2L PEG has similar cleansing results compared with the standard bowel preparation, which may be an alternative used in patients who are intolerable to high doses of liquids.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"27 4","pages":"Pages 168-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72067471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Derivaciones biliodigestivas en obstrucción maligna. Drenaje guiado por ultrasonido endoscópico vs. percutáneo. Un estudio comparativo","authors":"María Fernanda Torres-Ruiz,&nbsp;José Guillermo de la Mora-Levy,&nbsp;Juan Octavio Alonso-Larraga,&nbsp;Julio C. Sanchez-del Monte,&nbsp;Angélica I. Hernandez-Guerrero","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The current method of reference for malignant biliary obstruction is endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP); however, this is not always successful or possible. In these cases, percutaneous drainage is the alternative option, but this is associated, among other adverse events, with patient discomfort and a high re-intervention rate. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is currently being introduced as a new approach when ERCP fails, as it can be performed during the same intervention with internal drainage.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare EUS-guided and percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction with failed ERCP.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The study included all patients with malignant biliary obstruction in which EUS-guided or percutaneous drainage was performed after a failed ERCP. The patients were divided into two groups; those that underwent percutaneous drainage and those who had EUS-guided drainage performed. Variables of interest included: technical and clinical success, early and late complications, and re-interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The EUS-guided drainage group (A) included 27 patients, with 29 procedures, and 31 patients in the percutaneous drainage group (B), with 55 interventions. Technical success in group A was 79.3%, and clinical success 92.8%. In group B technical success was 90.9%, and clinical success was 68.7%, (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.13 and <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.07, respectively). There were early complications in 13.7% in group A vs 9.0% in group B (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.50), while late complications and re-interventions were significantly higher in group B (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.002)</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Clinical success was better in patients with EUS-guided biliary drainage, and complications and re-interventions were lower than in patients with percutaneous drainage. EUS-guided biliary drainage seems a better alternative than percutaneous drainage when ERCP fails.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"27 4","pages":"Pages 162-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.12.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72067472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hallazgos endoscópicos en pacientes con obesidad. ¿Existe correlación con los síntomas?","authors":"Hugo López Acevedo ,&nbsp;José Armando Macario Valencia Romero ,&nbsp;Carlos Javier Mata Quintero ,&nbsp;Marisela Díaz Oyola ,&nbsp;Federico Alberto Pérez González ,&nbsp;Mircea González Villarello ,&nbsp;María de los Ángeles Herrera Ramírez ,&nbsp;Omar Jesús Pineda Oliva ,&nbsp;Andrés Sosa López ,&nbsp;Jorge Farell Rivas ,&nbsp;Jorge Alberto Bello Guerrero ,&nbsp;Gabriela Rodríguez Ruíz ,&nbsp;Julio César Soto Pérez ,&nbsp;Víctor José Cuevas Osorio","doi":"10.1016/j.endomx.2015.10.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Obesity is a public health problem in Mexico. Bariatric surgery has been effective for its management. Preoperative endoscopy is required to detect any disease that not has been diagnosed. Many obese patients do not present with gastrointestinal symptoms, but when they do, they are more intense. There have been few evaluations on the relationship between these symptoms and preoperative endoscopic findings.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the relationship between the preoperative endoscopic findings and the gastrointestinal symptoms in obese patients prior to bariatric surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A 5-year retrospective and cross-sectional study was performed, that included patients with obesity grade <span>ii</span> with comorbidities, and obesity grade <span>iii</span> or greater, who have undergone preoperative upper endoscopy, and were questioned about the presence or absence of gastrointestinal symptoms. Exclusion criteria:<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->18 years,<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->65 years, pregnancy, breastfeeding and serious or terminal underlying disease. The correlation between the symptoms and endoscopic findings was calculated using phi coefficient, with P&lt;.05 being statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 53 patients. The mean age was 45<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9 years (range: 23-61); with 22 males and 31 females. The mean Body Mass Index was 49.1<!--> <!-->kg/m² (range: 37.5-92.5). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed some kind of finding in 83.01% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44), and 16.98% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->9) normal endoscopy. The phi coefficient reported a positive correlation (rϕ<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.271, <em>P</em>=.049).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is statistically significant positive correlation between the symptoms presented in obese patients for bariatric surgery and endoscopic findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100465,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopia","volume":"27 4","pages":"Pages 150-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.endomx.2015.10.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72067475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}