Ariel Killen-Sweeney, Victoria Sennabaum, Margaret Carlson
{"title":"A Strategic Approach to Workforce Management","authors":"Ariel Killen-Sweeney, Victoria Sennabaum, Margaret Carlson","doi":"10.1002/gas.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Utilities across the country are investing in modernizing the grid, hardening infrastructure, and connecting clean energy resources to their grid. Regulators often push back on proposed increases in capital spend and headcount. Workforce challenges are compounding the issue, as many experienced utility workers are retiring, hiring for key jobs is difficult, and utilities are competing with other sectors for skilled labor. This is reflected in the fact that 56 percent of utility workers have fewer than 10 years of industry experience, indicating significant turnover and the replacement of experienced workers in recent years, according to the Center for Energy Workforce Development (CEWD).</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 2","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148753969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Large Loads”—Meaning Data Centers—Won't Wait","authors":"Jeff D. Makholm, Laura T.W. Olive","doi":"10.1002/gas.70045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<p>At its June 18th, 2026, Open Meeting the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced bipartisan action for Large Loads (aka, data centers). Secretary of Energy Chris Wright had pressed FERC in October 2025 to devise new rules to address administrative delays and large, looming consumer costs associated with such Large Loads. Rather than open a proceeding to create one set of new Large Load rules, FERC took a different approach. The agency directed its six regional transmission organizations (RTOs) to develop their own Large Load remedies through six “show cause” proceedings. FERC's action compels the six RTOs to justify, in the next 60 days, why their existing means for dealing with Large Loads—again, data centers—are “just and reasonable.” If not, such show cause proceedings compel the RTOs to propose and implement specific remedies.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 2","pages":"21-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148753970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Data Centers, PJM, and Natural Gas—a Rubik's Cube","authors":"Richard G. Smead","doi":"10.1002/gas.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is no secret that the Northeast US is experiencing significant growth in power demand, from Virginia to New England. Much of this growth results from the proliferation of data centers requiring vast amounts of perfectly reliable electricity. In my January 2026 column, I took a more specific look at the Northeast, including New England and New York, and explored the growth, including data center activity in the Boston area and efforts to provide necessary natural gas supply. However, the largest data center-driven growth is occurring in the Mid-Atlantic portion of Northeast power and gas-consuming markets, emanating from the birthplace of the boom in Northern Virginia. In other words, it is in the Pennsylvania–New Jersey–Maryland (PJM) Interconnection, the regional transmission organization (RTO) that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity in all or parts of 13 states and the District of Columbia.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 2","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148753971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Problem with Price Elasticity and Electricity Rate Design","authors":"John Caldwell","doi":"10.1002/gas.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>For both electric utilities and regulators that oversee them, it is the elephant in the room—the issue that can never be discussed or even acknowledged. I am referring to price elasticity of demand. When a utility goes in for a rate case and is allowed a certain increase in revenue requirements—and consequently an increase in electricity rates—to cover approved changes in cost of service, the utility's representatives rarely ask the regulatory commission to consider a further increase to compensate for usage reductions stemming from consumer reactions to the price increase. The increase already approved usually came about after a contentious hearing involving intervenors challenging the level of the increase, or even whether any increase at all should have been allowed, and it was usually a hard-fought battle. I once asked a utility employee who had worked on rate cases if the subject of price elasticity ever surfaced during the hearings, and he replied that it was just generally assumed—by both the utility and the regulator—that price elasticity does not exist. The issues already under discussion and debate in the rate case were more than enough for the utility to contend with.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 2","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148753972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Growing Disconnect Between Measured and Experienced Affordability: A New Framework for Affordability","authors":"Brian Rich","doi":"10.1002/gas.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p>For decades, the energy sector has relied on a relatively stable set of indicators to assess the cost of service to customers and their ability to pay. Metrics like energy burden, expenditures as a percentage of household income, and average residential electricity costs have served as foundational tools for regulators, utilities, and policymakers seeking to assess customer impact. By many of these measures, electricity in the US remains comparatively affordable, with residential electric expenditures representing a relatively stable share of household spending over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 2","pages":"16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148753973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Opacity of the Public Interest in Utility Regulation","authors":"Kenneth W. Costello","doi":"10.1002/gas.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p>For utility regulators, the central concern is acting in the “public interest,” typically viewed as the guiding purpose for regulatory decisions. The late economist and utility regulator Alfred Kahn defined the public interest as promoting economic efficiency (e.g., marginal-cost pricing, efficient utility operations), consumer protection (e.g., from discriminatory and insufficient access to utility service), and the emulation of competitive market outcomes in sectors where competition was not possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 1","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148533613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From Retirement to Revival: How Policy, Demand, and Politics Are Driving US Reactor Restarts","authors":"Will Hubbs, Emma Leonardi","doi":"10.1002/gas.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As states work to comply with new clean energy mandates, the federal government looks for infrastructure investments that can withstand political shifts. And, as data centers drive an unprecedented surge in electricity demand, nuclear energy has quietly reentered the energy conversation in the US. It is one of the few alternatives that can advance climate goals and provide reliable baseload generation, while simultaneously gaining bipartisan support in Washington. National consensus in the US around nuclear power has shifted so dramatically that shuttered nuclear plants are being evaluated for reopening in multiple states as utilities and policymakers seek carbon-free, dependable generation that can meet both policy goals and rising electricity demand. The proposed restarts of Palisades in Michigan and Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania (which will now be called the Crane Clean Energy Center) illustrate the distinct political, economic, and market forces driving these reopenings.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 1","pages":"18-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148533614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Portfolio Optimization and the Repowering Legacy Natural Gas Generation","authors":"Paul A. DeCotis","doi":"10.1002/gas.70039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70039","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Balancing a portfolio of power generation assets across regions in the US is fraught with challenges due to the fragmented nature of markets and varying regulatory regimes. Developers with projects across the 50 states face different regulatory and administrative burdens and different financial and power market conditions. As the need for new generation capacity across regions grows and concerns about energy affordability remain top-of-mind for policymakers and regulators, developers are consolidating assets and entering new markets through acquisitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 1","pages":"22-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148533615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Framework for Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Operationalization and Value Realization","authors":"Nate Twardock","doi":"10.1002/gas.70037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Electrical battery technology is not new. Experiments with electric charge storage began in the mid-1700s. In 1800, Alessandro Volta invented the first true electrical battery. After two centuries of innovation, deployment of battery energy storage systems (BESS) is accelerating globally. BESS is becoming a leader of the distributed energy resource (DER) movement, reshaping the energy flow by co-locating capacity with customer load instead of the traditional generation to customer model. The versatility of BESS enables operators to inject or draw energy from the electric grid on command, providing greater grid flexibly.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148533610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Endangerment Finding Repeal—Legal Challenges and State Climate Authority May Alter Intended Outcomes","authors":"David W. South","doi":"10.1002/gas.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2009, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that greenhouse gases (GHG) jeopardize public health and welfare. This “Endangerment Finding” was the legal foundation for all subsequent rules proposed to regulate GHG emissions at the federal and state level.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"43 1","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148533799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}