Journal of midwifery & women's health最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Prevalence of Antenatally Identified Lactation Risk Factors and Risk of Not Fully Breastfeeding at 6 to 8 Weeks Postpartum. 产前确定的哺乳危险因素的患病率和产后6至8周未完全母乳喂养的风险。
IF 2.3
Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2025-07-29 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.70006
Sharon L Perrella, Stuart A Prosser, Philip Vlaskovsky, Donna T Geddes
{"title":"Prevalence of Antenatally Identified Lactation Risk Factors and Risk of Not Fully Breastfeeding at 6 to 8 Weeks Postpartum.","authors":"Sharon L Perrella, Stuart A Prosser, Philip Vlaskovsky, Donna T Geddes","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several anatomical and endocrine factors have been linked to breastfeeding difficulties, yet there is limited evidence for their prevalence and associated postpartum breastfeeding outcomes. Knowledge of the prevalence and impact of nonmodifiable lactation risk factors can inform clinical care. We examined the prevalence of antenatally identifiable lactation risk factors and associated breastfeeding outcomes at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study examined matched antenatal lactation risk screening data and infant feeding method at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum in a cohort of Australian women who gave birth at term gestation. The prevalence of lactation risk factors, associated full breastfeeding rates, and risk ratios for not fully breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screening data were obtained for 519 women; 408 were complete, and 296 had matched lactation outcome data. One lactation risk factor was identified in 65.4% (267 of 408) of women. Of those with no risk factors, 77.1% (81 of 105) were fully breastfeeding compared with 60.2% (115 of 191) with one risk factor, with a relative risk of not fully breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.14-2.50). Other significant risk factors included gestational diabetes (GDM) (relative risk, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.24-2.34) and prepregnancy body mass index greater than or equal to 25 (relative risk, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.30-2.34); coexistence of these factors more than doubled the risk of not fully breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum (relative risk, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.58-3.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nonmodifiable lactation risk factors may be identified in half of pregnant women. Previously identified risks of GDM and increased body mass index are compounded when they coexist, posing significant risks to early full breastfeeding outcomes. Antenatal identification of lactation risk factors offers opportunities to proactively educate and support women at risk to optimize breastfeeding and subsequent maternal and child health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144746656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a Medication Abortion Simulation for Midwifery and Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Students: Not Just Another Sim. 为助产学和妇女保健护士执业学生开发药物流产模拟:不仅仅是另一个模拟。
Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13786
Carrie E Neerland, Melissa A Saftner, Stephanie Delkoski, Erin Galegher, Maria Ruud, Anne Woll, Joseph M Miller, David Melchionne-Martinez, Lou Clark
{"title":"Development of a Medication Abortion Simulation for Midwifery and Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Students: Not Just Another Sim.","authors":"Carrie E Neerland, Melissa A Saftner, Stephanie Delkoski, Erin Galegher, Maria Ruud, Anne Woll, Joseph M Miller, David Melchionne-Martinez, Lou Clark","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13786","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13786","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobb's v Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v Wade, has led to varying state-level restrictions and expansions in abortion access. In Minnesota, certified nurse-midwives and advanced practice registered nurses, including women's health nurse practitioners, were granted the ability to provide medication abortion. This expanded role necessitates comprehensive education to ensure students are equipped with the skills and confidence to provide high-quality abortion care. Simulation-based training, particularly using simulated patient (SP) methodology, offers an effective approach to preparing students for medication abortion care. An interprofessional team at the University of Minnesota School of Nursing developed an SP-based simulation curriculum to supplement midwifery and women's health student's training in medication abortion. The curriculum, designed using the Association of SP Educators' Standards of Best Practice, provided students with the opportunity to practice patient counseling, consent, and medication dispensing in a safe and supportive environment. The simulation was implemented with 20 midwifery and women's health students. Students highlighted the simulation's effectiveness in improving confidence, with some suggesting more detailed presimulation preparation. The SP-based simulation effectively enhanced students' perceived clinical skills and confidence in providing medication abortion care. The positive feedback emphasizes the value of SP-based simulation in preparing students for emerging clinical needs. Future improvements could include earlier didactic content and broader simulation scenarios. This innovation demonstrates the need for accessible and high-quality medication abortion care training to address disparities in health care access.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信