{"title":"Diabetes-Related Stigma among Adolescents: Emotional Self-Efficacy, Aggressiveness, Self-Care, and Barriers to Treatment Compliance.","authors":"Stephanie Ortiz-Domenech, Eduardo Cumba-Avilés","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies indicate that over 60% of adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience diabetes-related stigma (DRS). DRS may affect their emotional self-efficacy (ESE), behavior, and self-care while increasing barriers to comply with physical and mental health treatment. We examined differences in ESE, aggressiveness, self-care, and barriers to comply with treatment among 51 T1D youths (aged 12-17 years) with (G1; <i>n</i> = 35) and without (G2; <i>n</i> = 16) any history of DRS enrolled in a depression treatment study. Using a MANOVA followed by individual univariate analyses, we compared groups in continuous variables, and to conduct comparisons in categorical variables, we used Chi-square tests. MANOVA results were significant, <i>F</i>(5, 45) = 3.20, <i>p</i> = .015. G1 reported lower scores than G2 on ESE, perception of the potential therapeutic impact of group sessions, and family support to comply with insulin treatment. G1 caregivers perceived their offspring as more aggressive and affected by barriers to treatment adherence than their counterparts. G1 members showed a higher proportion of cases with body mass index problems, non-compliance with their meal plan, and multiple episodes of hypoglycemia. Compared to G2, a lower percentage of adolescents in G1 met the recommended glycemic control levels. Our findings support the relationship of DRS with a lower ESE, more behavioral problems, difficulties in food-related self-care, and more barriers to comply with the treatment of diabetes and emotional problems in adolescents. They suggest the need for large-scale education to prevent DRS and psychosocial interventions to combat its impact in adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":93619,"journal":{"name":"Salud y conducta humana","volume":"8 1","pages":"82-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9265144/pdf/nihms-1818133.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40582294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comorbid Chronic Physical Illnesses in Type 1 Diabetes Adolescents: Personal, Caregiver, and Family Functioning.","authors":"Demivette Gómez-Rivera, Eduardo Cumba-Avilés","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Having diabetes and comorbid chronic physical illnesses (CCPIs) suggests a higher risk for depression and lower health-related quality of life and treatment adherence. Caring for these patients is often overwhelming. Although CCPIs affect youths with type 1 diabetes (T1D), no study has examined the psychosocial or health-related impact of CCPIs in this population. We examined individual, caregiver, and family functioning differences among T1D adolescents with (G1; <i>n</i> = 25) and without (G2; <i>n</i> = 26) CCPIs. Participants were 51 youth (aged 12-17 years) enrolled in a depression treatment study. We administered diagnostic interviews and rating scales to assess each domain of interest. Using MANOVA, followed by individual univariate analyses, and Chi-square tests, we compared groups in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. MANOVA results were significant, <i>F</i>(4, 46) = 2.62, <i>p</i> = .047. Participants from G1 obtained lower global functioning scores compared to G2. Caregivers whose offspring had CCPIs were more depressed and reported higher burden but lower family functioning scores than their counterparts did. A higher percent of youths with CCPIs needed reminders about insulin use and met the criteria for major depression, but a lower proportion had access to insulin pumps. Taking care of youths from G1 was associated with a lifetime history of depressive disorder or suicidality. Our findings support the existence of individual, caregiver, and family functioning differences between T1D adolescents with vs. without CCPIs. Psychosocial interventions should consider the incremental burden that CCPIs may pose over these youth and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":93619,"journal":{"name":"Salud y conducta humana","volume":"8 1","pages":"66-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291632/pdf/nihms-1818130.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40606434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}