Comorbid Chronic Physical Illnesses in Type 1 Diabetes Adolescents: Personal, Caregiver, and Family Functioning.

Salud y conducta humana Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-23
Demivette Gómez-Rivera, Eduardo Cumba-Avilés
{"title":"Comorbid Chronic Physical Illnesses in Type 1 Diabetes Adolescents: Personal, Caregiver, and Family Functioning.","authors":"Demivette Gómez-Rivera,&nbsp;Eduardo Cumba-Avilés","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Having diabetes and comorbid chronic physical illnesses (CCPIs) suggests a higher risk for depression and lower health-related quality of life and treatment adherence. Caring for these patients is often overwhelming. Although CCPIs affect youths with type 1 diabetes (T1D), no study has examined the psychosocial or health-related impact of CCPIs in this population. We examined individual, caregiver, and family functioning differences among T1D adolescents with (G1; <i>n</i> = 25) and without (G2; <i>n</i> = 26) CCPIs. Participants were 51 youth (aged 12-17 years) enrolled in a depression treatment study. We administered diagnostic interviews and rating scales to assess each domain of interest. Using MANOVA, followed by individual univariate analyses, and Chi-square tests, we compared groups in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. MANOVA results were significant, <i>F</i>(4, 46) = 2.62, <i>p</i> = .047. Participants from G1 obtained lower global functioning scores compared to G2. Caregivers whose offspring had CCPIs were more depressed and reported higher burden but lower family functioning scores than their counterparts did. A higher percent of youths with CCPIs needed reminders about insulin use and met the criteria for major depression, but a lower proportion had access to insulin pumps. Taking care of youths from G1 was associated with a lifetime history of depressive disorder or suicidality. Our findings support the existence of individual, caregiver, and family functioning differences between T1D adolescents with vs. without CCPIs. Psychosocial interventions should consider the incremental burden that CCPIs may pose over these youth and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":93619,"journal":{"name":"Salud y conducta humana","volume":"8 1","pages":"66-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291632/pdf/nihms-1818130.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud y conducta humana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Having diabetes and comorbid chronic physical illnesses (CCPIs) suggests a higher risk for depression and lower health-related quality of life and treatment adherence. Caring for these patients is often overwhelming. Although CCPIs affect youths with type 1 diabetes (T1D), no study has examined the psychosocial or health-related impact of CCPIs in this population. We examined individual, caregiver, and family functioning differences among T1D adolescents with (G1; n = 25) and without (G2; n = 26) CCPIs. Participants were 51 youth (aged 12-17 years) enrolled in a depression treatment study. We administered diagnostic interviews and rating scales to assess each domain of interest. Using MANOVA, followed by individual univariate analyses, and Chi-square tests, we compared groups in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. MANOVA results were significant, F(4, 46) = 2.62, p = .047. Participants from G1 obtained lower global functioning scores compared to G2. Caregivers whose offspring had CCPIs were more depressed and reported higher burden but lower family functioning scores than their counterparts did. A higher percent of youths with CCPIs needed reminders about insulin use and met the criteria for major depression, but a lower proportion had access to insulin pumps. Taking care of youths from G1 was associated with a lifetime history of depressive disorder or suicidality. Our findings support the existence of individual, caregiver, and family functioning differences between T1D adolescents with vs. without CCPIs. Psychosocial interventions should consider the incremental burden that CCPIs may pose over these youth and their families.

1型糖尿病青少年的共病慢性身体疾病:个人、照顾者和家庭功能。
患有糖尿病和共病慢性身体疾病(ccpi)表明患抑郁症的风险较高,健康相关生活质量和治疗依从性较低。照顾这些病人往往是压倒性的。虽然ccpi影响青少年1型糖尿病(T1D),但没有研究检查ccpi对这一人群的心理社会或健康相关影响。我们研究了个体、照顾者和家庭功能在T1D青少年(G1;n = 25),无(G2;n = 26) ccpi。参与者是51名参加抑郁症治疗研究的青少年(12-17岁)。我们使用诊断访谈和评分量表来评估每个感兴趣的领域。使用方差分析,然后是个体单变量分析和卡方检验,我们分别比较了连续变量和分类变量组。方差分析结果具有显著性,F(4,46) = 2.62, p = 0.047。与G2组相比,G1组的参与者整体功能得分较低。子女患有ccpi的照顾者比子女患有ccpi的照顾者更抑郁,报告的负担更高,但家庭功能得分较低。患有ccpi的青少年需要提醒胰岛素的使用,并且符合重度抑郁症的标准,但获得胰岛素泵的比例较低。照顾G1的青少年与抑郁症或自杀的终生病史有关。我们的研究结果支持有ccpi和没有ccpi的T1D青少年之间存在个人、照顾者和家庭功能差异。社会心理干预应考虑ccpi可能对这些青年及其家庭造成的增量负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信