Journal of medical regulation最新文献_第7页

The Challenge of Moving Towards Data-Driven Regulation: One State Medical Board’s Experience 迈向数据驱动监管的挑战:一个州医学委员会的经验

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-108.1.29

Jean Fisher Brinkley, Brian Blankenship, Deborah Aldridge, Michael Shuping

引用次数: 0

Supporting our State Medical Boards to Ensure the Safety of the Public 支持我们的国家医学委员会确保公众的安全

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-108.4.5

H. Chaudhry

引用次数: 0

Characteristics, Predictors and Reasons for Regulatory Body Disciplinary Action in Health Care: A Scoping Review 医疗保健监管机构纪律处分的特点、预测因素和原因:范围综述

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.17

Ai-Leng Foong-Reichert, Ariane Fung, C. Carter, K. Grindrod, S. Houle

{"title":"Characteristics, Predictors and Reasons for Regulatory Body Disciplinary Action in Health Care: A Scoping Review","authors":"Ai-Leng Foong-Reichert, Ariane Fung, C. Carter, K. Grindrod, S. Houle","doi":"10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.17","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 What research has been done to characterize the outcomes of disciplinary action or fitness-to-practice cases for regulated health professionals?\u0000 To answer this research question, relevant publications were identified in PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, and Scopus. Included papers focused on reviews of regulatory body disciplinary action for regulated health professionals.\u0000 Of 108 papers that were included, 84 studied reasons for discipline, 68 studied penalties applied, and 89 studied characteristics/predictors of discipline. Most were observational studies that used administrative data such as regulatory body discipline cases. Studies were published between 1990–2020, with two-thirds published from 2010–2020. Most research has focused on physicians (64%), nurses (10%), multiple health professionals (8.3%), dentists (6.5%) and pharmacists (5.5%). Most research has originated from the United States (53%), United Kingdom (16%), Australia (9.2%), and Canada (6.5%). Characteristics that were reviewed included: gender, age, years in practice, practice specialty, license type/profession, previous disciplinary action, board certification, and performance on licensing examinations.\u0000 As most research has focused on physicians and has originated from the United States, more research on other professions and jurisdictions is needed. Lack of standardization in disciplinary processes and definitions used to categorize reasons for discipline is a barrier to comparison across jurisdictions and professions. Future research on characteristics and predictors should be used to improve equity, support practitioners, and decrease disciplinary action.","PeriodicalId":91752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical regulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44170626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

How Diverse are State Medical Boards? 州医疗委员会的多样性如何？

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.33

David Johnson, Andrea Anderson

引用次数: 0

News & Notes 新闻与笔记

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.4

引用次数: 0

Rising Above Pandemic Challenges to Ensure the Safety of the Public 超越疫情挑战确保公众安全

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.5

H. Chaudhry

引用次数: 0

Editor's Note: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Medical Regulation 编者注:医疗监管中的多样性、公平性和包容性

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.32

H. M. Koenig

引用次数: 1

Disciplinary Action Against UK Health Professionals for Sexual Misconduct: A Matter of Reputational Damage or Public Safety? 对英国卫生专业人员性不端行为的纪律处分：名誉损害还是公共安全？

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.7

C. Gallagher, Jeta Thaci, Georgina Saadalla, Nasteha A Mohamed, Murwo M. Ismail, Thelma Gossel, Melissa Attopley

{"title":"Disciplinary Action Against UK Health Professionals for Sexual Misconduct: A Matter of Reputational Damage or Public Safety?","authors":"C. Gallagher, Jeta Thaci, Georgina Saadalla, Nasteha A Mohamed, Murwo M. Ismail, Thelma Gossel, Melissa Attopley","doi":"10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.7","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The regulation of health care professionals in the United Kingdom (UK) falls under the authority of one of nine General Councils, each of which has a statutory duty to ensure the fitness to practice of a subdivision of these professionals. Among the matters that may call fitness to practice into question are deviations from published standards of behavior, which include the maintenance of appropriate sexual boundaries by practitioners. The aim of this article is to examine how the common fitness-to-practice process utilized by General Councils deals with registered health care professionals who have exceeded these boundaries.\u0000 Deductive thematic analysis was carried out on cases involving academic misconduct among registrants of the General Medical Council, General Dental Council, General Pharmaceutical Council, and Nursing and Midwifery Council, using themes derived from each council’s standards for registrants and guidance for disciplinary panel members.\u0000 While each of these four cases involved some form of sexually motivated misconduct, the facts in each case were significantly different; however, not only was the outcome the same, but the rationale was similar in each instance. While the protection of the health, safety and well-being of the public may be considered in cases involving sexual misconduct, the need to maintain public and professional confidence in their respective professions is sufficient grounds alone to end the careers of health professionals who engage in sexual misconduct.","PeriodicalId":91752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical regulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43871940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

The Doctors Blackwell 布莱克威尔医生

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.41

Frances E. Cain

引用次数: 1

State Medical Board of Ohio Reinforces Duty to Report for its Licensees 俄亥俄州医学委员会加强了其被许可人的报告义务

Journal of medical regulation Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.37

Jerica Stewart, Michael Schottenstein

引用次数: 0