Northwestern journal of law and social policy最新文献_第9页

Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights & Civil Procedure 宪章诉讼、社会经济权利与民事诉讼

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1255

Vasuda Sinha, Lorne Sossin, Jenna Meguid

引用次数: 0

The Intersection of Exploitation and Coercion in Cases of Canadian Labour Trafficking 加拿大劳工贩运案件中剥削与胁迫的交集

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1259

J. Beatson, Jill Hanley, Alexandra Ricard-Guay

引用次数: 11

Socioeconomic Rights Adjudication in Canada: Can the Minimum Core Help in Adjudicating the Rights to Life and Security of the Person under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? 加拿大社会经济权利裁决:《加拿大权利与自由宪章》规定的生命权和人身安全权的最低核心有助于裁决吗?

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1225

A. Kwadrans

引用次数: 2

Book Review: Women’s Rights to Social Security and Social Protection, edited by Beth Goldblatt & Lucie Lamarche 书评:《妇女享有社会保障和社会保护的权利》，贝丝·戈德布拉特和露西·拉马奇主编

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1228

Vanessa Patrícia Soares de Sousa

引用次数: 0

The Cost of Uncertainty: Navigating the Boundary Between Legal Information and Legal Services in the Access to Justice Sector 不确定性的成本:在司法部门获取法律信息和法律服务之间的边界导航

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1222

J. Bond, D. Wiseman, E. Bates

引用次数: 1

Book Review: The Healing Journey: Intimate Partner Abuse and Its Implications in the Labour Market, by Linda DeRiviere 书评:《治愈之旅:亲密伴侣虐待及其对劳动力市场的影响》，琳达·德里维埃著

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1227

E. Epp

引用次数: 1

Government Efforts to Address Bullying in Canada: Any Place for Children’s Rights? 加拿大政府努力解决欺凌问题:儿童权利还有立足之地吗?

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1224

Mona Paré, Tara M. Collins

{"title":"Government Efforts to Address Bullying in Canada: Any Place for Children’s Rights?","authors":"Mona Paré, Tara M. Collins","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.60082/0829-3929.1224","url":null,"abstract":"Au Canada, les gouvernements ont récemment intensifié leurs efforts pour combattre l’intimidation dans les écoles, principalement en adoptant des lois et des politiques. Cet article examine ces mesures en utilisant le cadre d’analyse des droits de l’enfant et en se fondant sur les obligations juridiques internationales du Canada. Il explore l’utilisation du langage des droits de l’enfant et des droits de la personne dans le contexte de ces efforts, ainsi que le contenu de la législation et des politiques. Les principes fondamentaux des droits de l’enfant orientent cette analyse : la non discrimination, l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant, le droit à la survie et au développement de l’enfant, et le respect des opinions de l’enfant. Les conclusions de l’article démontrent la présence fragmentée des droits de l’enfant dans les efforts provinciaux et leur absence dans les efforts fédéraux. Les auteures soutiennent que l’inclusion explicite des droits de l’enfant dans la législation en matière d’éducation est une étape minimale pour assurer une application plus uniforme et systémique des droits de l’enfant dans toutes les initiatives contre l’intimidation. Recently, governments in Canada have increased efforts to address bullying in schools primarily through the adoption of laws and policies. This paper examines these measures using a child rights framework, based on Canada’s international legal obligations. It examines the language of child rights and human rights that is present in these efforts, as well as the content of legislation and policies. Analysis is guided by the main child rights principles: non-discrimination, the best interests of the child, the child’s right to survival and development, and respect for the views the child. The findings point to a fragmented presence of child rights in provincial efforts and their absence in federal efforts. The authors contend","PeriodicalId":89609,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern journal of law and social policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79996178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 28

Disability Disclosure in the Digital Age: Why the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario Should Reform its Approach to Anonymized Decisions 数字时代的残疾信息披露:为什么安大略省人权法庭应该改革其匿名裁决的方法

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1226

Natalie A. MacDonnell

引用次数: 0

Zoning Out Discrimination: Working Towards Housing Equality in Ontario 消除歧视:在安大略省努力实现住房平等

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.60082/0829-3929.1223

J. Roher

引用次数: 2

The Terrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad 恐怖分子的否决:为什么第一修正案必须保护对先知穆罕默德的挑衅性描绘

Northwestern journal of law and social policy Pub Date : 2015-04-08 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2592098

D. Ortner

{"title":"The Terrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad","authors":"D. Ortner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2592098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2592098","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes why the Government should not be able to proscribe the publication or republication of provocative media, even when there is reason to believe that the publication could potentially lead to violence and reprisals against soldiers, diplomats, or citizens. This article will consider the various exemptions to the First Amendment which allow for the government to regulate or restrict certain types of unprotected speech. While there are many similarities between justifications for these doctrines and those that would justify preventing provocative speech such as images of Muhammad, the differences are even more significant and show why it would be unwise to allow the restriction of such provocative speech. Most significantly, every single category of unprotected speech has something intrinsic in the speech or the intent of speaker which makes the speech less valuable in some way. In contrast, punishing provocative and otherwise fully protected speech solely because of the reaction it engenders would be an anomaly because it would impose speech restriction purely for extrinsic reasons. It would be a terrorist’s veto allowing those opposed to an idea the ability to suppress its expression through threats of violence. Such a veto would offend the core First Amendment principle that “constitutional rights may not be denied simply because of hostility to their assertion or exercise.” Just as the heckler’s veto which the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected, such a terrorist’s veto is impermissible under the First Amendment.","PeriodicalId":89609,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern journal of law and social policy","volume":"12 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68214657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0