Oxford studies in ancient philosophy最新文献

Why the Philosopher Kings will Believe the Noble Lie 为什么哲学家国王会相信高尚的谎言

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy Pub Date : 2016-06-01 DOI: 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198778226.003.0003

C. Rowett

引用次数: 12

On Aristotle’s World 论亚里士多德的世界

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712923.003.0008

K. Kukkonen

引用次数: 19

Cicero and Dicaearchus 西塞罗和狄卡耳克斯

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy Pub Date : 2012-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199644384.003.0008

S. McConnell

{"title":"Cicero and Dicaearchus","authors":"S. McConnell","doi":"10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199644384.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199644384.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"Cicero's general interest in Dicaearchus' ethical and political thought can be detected in his letters to Atticus and De legibus. At present, however, we do not possess a clear and detailed picture of Dicaearchus' influence on Cicero's own ethical and political thought. This chapter argues that, despite these obstacles, we can construct a positive account of the nature and extent of Dicaearchus' influence that offers new insights into key aspects of Cicero's philosophical thought and practice. First it offers a novel reconstruction of Dicaearchus' argument for the supremacy of the praktikos bios and his relationship with Aristotle and Theophrastus in the Peripatetic tradition. The chapter then considers how Dicaearchus figures in Cicero's political and ethical deliberations by analysing a letter to Atticus in which Dicaearchus is referred to by name. At this point we are in a position to identify the precise nature of Dicaearchus' influence on Cicero's De republica, which is the subject of the final and concluding section. Here the chapter argues that Cicero's vision of philosophy and its role in Roman political culture, as showcased in the preface to De republica, is appropriated in all fundamental respects from Dicaearchus","PeriodicalId":89211,"journal":{"name":"Oxford studies in ancient philosophy","volume":"42 1","pages":"307-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60651597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Aristotle on the role of the predicables in dialectical disputations 亚里士多德论可预词在辩证法辩论中的作用

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199666164.003.0003

M. Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M. Tuominen

引用次数: 1

THE QUALITATIVE STATUS OF THE ONKOI IN ASCLEPIADES' THEORY OF MATTER. 在阿斯克勒皮亚斯物质理论中的质性地位。

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy Pub Date : 2009-07-01

David Leith

{"title":"THE QUALITATIVE STATUS OF THE ONKOI IN ASCLEPIADES' THEORY OF MATTER.","authors":"David Leith","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The medical and philosophical system of Asclepiades of Bithynia (fl. later second century BC)(1) has been the subject of considerable controversy.(2) His physical theory of anarmoi onkoi in particular has seen intense debate, and although many of its broader features appear to be fairly well established, many of its most fundamental details remain obscure. Perhaps somewhat paradoxically, some of the most important work carried out on Asclepiades has been explicitly focused instead on Heraclides of Pontus,(3) the reconstruction of whose physical theory has often proceeded on the assumption that this was largely replicated by Asclepiades some two centuries later. But to a great extent the Asclepiadean debate has been framed in terms of the question of his intellectual debts to ancient atomism, and Epicureanism in particular, and in this respect the present study will be no different.(4) The most recent scholarship has been sharply divided over this question. Vallance has emphasized the principally medical context of Asclepiades' system, and made the case that the frangibility of the onkoi marks such a fundamental divergence from Epicurus' atomism that any influence from Epicurean physics should be rejected, and that we should look instead especially to Erasistratus.(5) Casadei, however, following on to a certain extent from the work of Pigeaud, has rightly drawn attention to the tendency in Vallance's exposition to suppress a number of fundamental elements of Asclepiades' doctrine which are undeniably also distinguishing features of Epicurean philosophy.(6) The most significant of these include his particulate theory of matter, his antiteleological conception of nature, and his rejection of any theory of qualitative change. But these correspondences would certainly not be sufficient to qualify Asclepiades' system simply as a reproduction of Epicureanism, and there is clear evidence that Asclepiades stood in opposition to Epicurus in certain fundamental respects. In a recent study which has done much to establish Asclepiades' credentials as a philosopher, focusing especially on his philosophy of mind, Polito has underlined certain distinctly non-Epicurean elements in his system, such as his radical determinism and his denial of a localized ruling-part-of-the-soul.(7) It thus seems clear that, despite some important parallels between their systems, Asclepiades cannot be regarded as an Epicurean physician. The evidence we have for his doctrine, and the authority which was accorded him by later writers, clearly attests to his status as an independent and innovative thinker in his own right. While Asclepiades' theory must, in my view, be analysed within the context of the Epicurean atomistic tradition, it must equally be acknowledged that any identifiable relationship between Epicurus and Asclepiades is likely to be one of considerable complexity.In this paper I shall attempt to explore further the nature of the relationship between Epicurus and A","PeriodicalId":89211,"journal":{"name":"Oxford studies in ancient philosophy","volume":"36 ","pages":"283-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2977080/pdf/ukmss-28665.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29468627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Speaking with the same voice as reason Personification in Plato’s psychology 和柏拉图心理学中的理性人格化是一样的

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy Pub Date : 2006-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511977831.007

Rachana Kamtekar

引用次数: 5

Eros and the Wise: The Stoic Response to a Cultural Dilemma 爱神与智者:斯多葛派对文化困境的回应

Oxford studies in ancient philosophy Pub Date : 1995-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9082-2_10

M. Nussbaum

引用次数: 23