Common law world review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Comparing UK and Irish law 比较英国和爱尔兰的法律
Common law world review Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/1473779518773645
P. Giliker
{"title":"Comparing UK and Irish law","authors":"P. Giliker","doi":"10.1177/1473779518773645","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779518773645","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"47 1","pages":"3 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779518773645","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65634396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Individual accountability in Irish credit institutions—Lessons to be learned from the United Kingdom’s Senior Managers’ Regime 爱尔兰信贷机构的个人问责制——借鉴英国高级管理人员制度的经验教训
Common law world review Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/1473779518773681
Blanaid Clarke
{"title":"Individual accountability in Irish credit institutions—Lessons to be learned from the United Kingdom’s Senior Managers’ Regime","authors":"Blanaid Clarke","doi":"10.1177/1473779518773681","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779518773681","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the Senior Managers' Regime (SMR), the duty of responsibility and the offence relating to a decision causing a financial institution to fail introduced by the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 to give legislative effect to the recommendations of the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards. The Commission had examined impediments to accountability in the wake of the LIBOR scandal. The article explores the value of introducing similar requirements and regulations in Ireland as a means of improving individual accountability and allaying public concern in light of the Irish Banking Crisis and the more recent tracker mortgage scandal. It concludes that in cases of mismanagement which is not deliberate or reckless, the Central Bank of Ireland's model of proactive and intensive supervision and enforcement might benefit from the utilization of a SMR enhanced administrative sanctions procedure alongside its Fitness and Probity Regime. However, the introduction of an offence in Ireland relating to a decision causing a financial institution to fail, while appearing to respond to a public desire to improve accountability, would give rise to a number of significant challenges particularly in relation to enforcement.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"47 1","pages":"35 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779518773681","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42645742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Land law, property ideologies and the British–Irish relationship 土地法、财产意识形态与英爱关系
Common law world review Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/1473779518773641
R. Walsh, Lorna Fox O’Mahony
{"title":"Land law, property ideologies and the British–Irish relationship","authors":"R. Walsh, Lorna Fox O’Mahony","doi":"10.1177/1473779518773641","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779518773641","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role of property ideologies, and the local contexts in which they were articulated and applied, in shaping English and Irish land law. Despite their shared histories and influences – from the transplant of the common law system to Ireland to traditions of training Irish lawyers and judges in English universities – the politics of property led Irish and English land law down distinct, and sometimes oppositional, ideological paths in the twentieth century. The politics and practices of land tenure, competing economic and property ideologies, and their direct links to the evolution of national identity and statehood in each jurisdiction, shaped the foundational commitments of English and Irish land law. The article traces the complexities of lived experience in regulating the use and ownership of land, as well as the role of global and local forces – from world-system movements (for example, the influence of European political developments in 1937 on the Irish Constitution) or bi-lateral relationships (for example, the impact of the Irish land wars on the English land reform movement, or the ongoing trade dependency between Britain and Ireland into the twentieth century). Our analysis reveals the multiple competing, and at times overlapping, property ideologies that shape property systems; and the powerful role of events and externalities in contextualising the practical, political, social and symbolic meaning and content of the law as it has evolved in local contexts, and in determining whether, and when, the status quo prevails, or a tipping point for law reform is reached.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"47 1","pages":"34 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779518773641","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48597707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Consumer reform in Ireland and the UK 爱尔兰和英国的消费者改革
Common law world review Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/1473779518773639
Clíona Kelly
{"title":"Consumer reform in Ireland and the UK","authors":"Clíona Kelly","doi":"10.1177/1473779518773639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779518773639","url":null,"abstract":"The departure of the UK from the European Union is likely to pose significant challenges for the Irish economy and legal system. This article explores the impact of various possible outcomes of Brexit negotiations on the ‘special relationship’ that currently exists between Irish and UK consumer law. If post-Brexit the Westminster Parliament is free to repeal or replace existing consumer rules of European origin, and courts are not bound to interpret remaining rules in a manner consistent with decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union, there is likely to be significant regulatory divergence between the two jurisdictions. In Ireland, the increasing impact of the European Union might affect not merely the substance of consumer rights, but also the architecture of statutes and categorisation of consumer rights, the language and conceptual tools used, and how rights are interpreted by the courts. This article also examines how regulatory divergence can be observed even prior to Brexit: the enactment of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 represents a significant change in the regulation of consumer contracts in the UK, and the inability of Ireland to progress a similar consolidation and reform of the law is the first of many divergences which we are likely to see in the coming years.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"47 1","pages":"53 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779518773639","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41586962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The need for an intrusion upon seclusion privacy tort within English law 英国法中侵犯隐居隐私侵权的必要性
Common law world review Pub Date : 2017-11-23 DOI: 10.1177/1473779517739798
John T. Hartshorne
{"title":"The need for an intrusion upon seclusion privacy tort within English law","authors":"John T. Hartshorne","doi":"10.1177/1473779517739798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779517739798","url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, New Zealand and the Canadian province of Ontario, recognition has been afforded to privacy torts remedying intrusions upon seclusion or solitude, and the creation of such a tort has also been recommended by the Australian Law Reform Commission. In England and Wales, recognition has so far only been afforded to a privacy tort remedying misuse of private information. This article considers the current prospects for the recognition of an intrusion upon seclusion tort within English law. It will be suggested that there is less necessity for such recognition following the apparent recent confirmation by the decisions in Gulati v MGN and Vidal-Hall v Google that misuse of private information claims may still be brought where there is no ensuing publication of wrongly acquired private information. Given that intrusions commonly result in the acquisition of private information, it will be suggested that many of the privacy interests protected by the intrusion torts in other jurisdictions may now therefore be protected in English law through a claim for misuse of private information.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"46 1","pages":"287 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779517739798","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48638440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Predictability, certainty, and party autonomy in the sale and supply of goods 商品销售和供应中的可预测性、确定性和当事人自主权
Common law world review Pub Date : 2017-11-10 DOI: 10.1177/1473779517735286
J. Yap
{"title":"Predictability, certainty, and party autonomy in the sale and supply of goods","authors":"J. Yap","doi":"10.1177/1473779517735286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779517735286","url":null,"abstract":"Predictability, certainty, and party autonomy are important goals in the development of legal principles. This article will examine these concepts and discuss a theoretical framework by which legal developments can be assessed. This theoretical framework will be applied in order to critically consider recent developments in two key areas relating to the sale and supply of goods, namely the action for price, and the characterization of contracts. In examining the interrelation between case law and legislation in these aspects of Commercial Law, the impact of the recent UK Supreme Court decision in PST Energy 7 Shipping v OW Bunker Malta (The Res Cogitans) will be explored. This landmark case considered several provisions of the UK Sale of Goods Act 1979. Many common law jurisdictions, such as Hong Kong and Singapore, have legislation that is very similar to the UK Sale of Goods Act, and Res Cogitans is thus of great interest and concern to those in such common law jurisdictions, since the courts in these jurisdictions are likely to view Res Cogitans as highly persuasive in the interpretation of similar local legislation. Various law reform options (including those inspired by the Canadian Uniform Sale of Goods Act) and suggestions for the drafting of contractual clauses will then be critically considered, with a view to promoting predictability, certainty, and party autonomy in the law relating to the sale and supply of goods.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"46 1","pages":"269 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779517735286","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47922312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Debiasing regulators 去监管机构
Common law world review Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI: 10.1177/1473779517725507
E. Ip
{"title":"Debiasing regulators","authors":"E. Ip","doi":"10.1177/1473779517725507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779517725507","url":null,"abstract":"Behavioral economics has revolutionized American legal scholarship in many areas of law, but not in administrative law, the law that regulates the regulators. This article theorizes that the administrative law doctrines developed by the Supreme Court of the United States strikingly resemble a system of ‘debiasing’ devices developed to counteract bureaucratic and judicial behavioral failures in just the areas that they matter most. A strong, alternative, justification may thus exist for the enduring paradox of American administrative law that administrators should be prepared to have their substantive decisions scrutinized by ‘hard look’ reviewing courts, while judges should be ready to defer to agencies on questions of statutory interpretation.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"46 1","pages":"171 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779517725507","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47566818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Book review: Tort Law and Human Rights (Hart Studies in Private Law) 书评:侵权法与人权(哈特私法研究)
Common law world review Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI: 10.1177/1473779517713981
P. Giliker
{"title":"Book review: Tort Law and Human Rights (Hart Studies in Private Law)","authors":"P. Giliker","doi":"10.1177/1473779517713981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779517713981","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"46 1","pages":"246 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779517713981","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43720746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Punitive damages for breach of contract 违约的惩罚性赔偿
Common law world review Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI: 10.1177/1473779517725010
S. Hickey
{"title":"Punitive damages for breach of contract","authors":"S. Hickey","doi":"10.1177/1473779517725010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779517725010","url":null,"abstract":"In the recent decision of PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd [2017] SCGA 26, the Singapore Court of Appeal considered whether punitive damages could be awarded for breach of contract. In doing so, the Court was tasked with choosing between Canadian jurisprudence, which permits punitive damages in contract cases, and English jurisprudence, which forbids them. The Court ultimately decided against making an award of punitive damages and followed the reasoning of earlier English courts. However, Leong JA, who wrote the leading judgment, refused to rule out the prospect of allowing an award of punitive damages in the future. In this respect, it seems that Singaporean courts are more amenable than their English counterparts towards punishment in the private law.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"46 1","pages":"239 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779517725010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42890228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The role of public enforcement in investor compensation 公共执法在投资者赔偿中的作用
Common law world review Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI: 10.1177/1473779517731737
Ying Hu
{"title":"The role of public enforcement in investor compensation","authors":"Ying Hu","doi":"10.1177/1473779517731737","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779517731737","url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has made an important shift in its enforcement strategy. Instead of initiating criminal and disciplinary proceedings to deter market misconduct, it has brought an increasing number of civil actions to obtain compensation for victims of misconduct. This article responds to criticisms against achieving investor compensation through public enforcement and explains why it can be both necessary and desirable for the SFC to bring compensation actions. These actions make up for the lack of private enforcement against certain types of misconduct and sometimes serve as a more effective tool to credibly commit to strong investor protection. Nevertheless, there is sometimes a divergence in interests between the SFC and the investors it is charged with protecting. As a result, some investors may benefit from such compensation actions at the expense of other equally deserving investors.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"46 1","pages":"216 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473779517731737","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45865403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信