ASME 2021 Power Conference最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Managing Risks Associated With Turbine First Steam Admission Following Inadequate Boiler Cleaning 管理风险与汽轮机第一蒸汽入场以下锅炉清洗不足
ASME 2021 Power Conference Pub Date : 2021-07-20 DOI: 10.1115/power2021-64846
J. Roy-Aikins, Gary de Klerk, Duduzile Ramasimong, Kumar Rupnarain
{"title":"Managing Risks Associated With Turbine First Steam Admission Following Inadequate Boiler Cleaning","authors":"J. Roy-Aikins, Gary de Klerk, Duduzile Ramasimong, Kumar Rupnarain","doi":"10.1115/power2021-64846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1115/power2021-64846","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Unit 6 of the recently completed six-unit Medupi coal-fired power station was the first unit to go into commercial operation. Synchronisation of the generator to the transmission grid had occurred five months before commercial operation. Prior to the admission of first steam to the turbines, the boiler underwent a three stage cleaning process, which was performed by the boiler contractor, to ensure that debris left over in the boiler from construction was removed and to avoid damage to the turbine when steam was admitted. Steam blowing of the boiler was the penultimate stage of boiler cleaning and contractually the steam would have been deemed clean when the steam cleanliness acceptance criteria were met.\u0000 The steam cleanliness acceptance criteria, which were set by the turbine contractor, relate to the number and size of indentations caused by particles striking a given area of each target plate situated in the temporary piping downstream of the inlet valves of the high pressure and intermediate pressure turbines. For each target plate, values were prescribed for these variables and for the flow conditions that should prevail in the pipe upstream. The boiler contractor had to meet these requirements. Unfortunately, there was a mismatch between the steam cleanliness requirements set by the turbine contractor and those included in the boiler contract. The less stringent steam cleanliness requirements set for the boiler contractor in the boiler contract meant that the boiler would not be adequately cleaned, from the point of view of the turbine contractor.\u0000 The boiler contractor designed a temporary pipework system for the steam blow-through process that permitted steam to bypass the turbines and exhaust to the atmosphere through a silencer. During steam blowing, the prescribed pipe flow conditions for accepting the steam were not being met, even after a large number of blows had been conducted. Mathematical modelling of the process revealed that the required pipe flow conditions could not be attained at the intermediate pressure turbine inlet and as such, the steam blow-through pipework was inadequately sized. The solution was to redesign the temporary pipework, and manufacture and install a new system of pipework, all of which would have taken a couple of months. Business needs required an alternative solution, and so a decision had to be taken on the way forward. Engineering judgement, based on operating and maintenance experience with the current fleet, suggested that the steam was sufficiently clean to be admitted to the turbine, with little risk.\u0000 Of the two feasible options available to the project team, admission of steam after a defined number of blows was accepted. Care had to be exercised to manage the risk that the potential turbine contractor non-compliance to any of the performance guarantee conditions could be blamed on poor steam quality. An analysis of the risks associated with this option was conducted and controls were adopted ","PeriodicalId":8567,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2021 Power Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89909163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Sandia National Laboratories Natural Circulation Cooler 桑迪亚国家实验室自然循环冷却器
ASME 2021 Power Conference Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1115/power2021-65399
B. Middleton, P. Brady, Serafina T. Lawles
{"title":"The Sandia National Laboratories Natural Circulation Cooler","authors":"B. Middleton, P. Brady, Serafina T. Lawles","doi":"10.1115/power2021-65399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1115/power2021-65399","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is developing a cooling technology concept — the Sandia National Laboratories Natural Circulation Cooler (SNLNCC) — that has potential to greatly improve the economic viability of hybrid cooling for power plants. The SNLNCC is a patented technology that holds promise for improved dry heat rejection capabilities when compared to currently available technologies. The cooler itself is a dry heat rejection device, but is conceptualized here as a heat exchanger used in conjunction with a wet cooling tower, creating a hybrid cooling system for a thermoelectric power plant.\u0000 The SNLNCC seeks to improve on currently available technologies by replacing the two-phase refrigerant currently used with either a supercritical fluid — such as supercritical CO2 (sCO2) — or a zeotropic mixture of refrigerants. In both cases, the heat being rejected by the water to the SNLNCC would be transferred over a range of temperatures, instead of at a single temperature as it is in a thermosyphon. This has the potential to improve the economics of dry heat rejection performance in three ways: decreasing the minimum temperature to which the water can be cooled, increasing the temperature to which air can be heated, and increasing the fraction of the year during which dry cooling is economically viable. This paper describes the experimental basis and the current state of the SNLNCC.","PeriodicalId":8567,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2021 Power Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83814154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信