Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform最新文献_第4页

Wohneigentum, sozialpolitische Einstellungen und Region 房屋，社会政策和区域

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2021-0006

Julia Heide

引用次数: 1

Die Rolle von Gesundheit und Krankheit im deutschen Armutsdiskurs 健康和疾病在德国贫穷假定中的作用

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2021-0005

Mareike Ariaans, N. Reibling

引用次数: 0

Beware of the “poverty migrant”: media discourses on EU labour migration and the welfare state in Germany and the UK 当心“贫穷移民”:媒体对欧盟劳工移民和德国和英国福利国家的论述

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2021-0001

S. Danaj, Ines Wagner

引用次数: 3

Die politische Gestaltung der Lebenswelten Geflüchteter: Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention als Leerstelle in der Flüchtlingspolitik 难民生活环境的政治设计：促进和预防健康是难民政策中的一个空白

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2021-0003

R. Henkel

引用次数: 2

Reform der Hinzuverdienstmöglichkeiten für Grundsicherungsbeziehende und Wechselwirkungen mit vorrangigen Leistungen: Auswirkungen auf Arbeitsangebot und Empfängerzahlen 基本收入机会的改革和与优先福利的互动：对劳动力供应和领取人数的影响

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2021-0002

Kerstin Bruckmeier, Jannek Mühlhan, Jürgen Wiemers

{"title":"Reform der Hinzuverdienstmöglichkeiten für Grundsicherungsbeziehende und Wechselwirkungen mit vorrangigen Leistungen: Auswirkungen auf Arbeitsangebot und Empfängerzahlen","authors":"Kerstin Bruckmeier, Jannek Mühlhan, Jürgen Wiemers","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2021-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2021-0002","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In diesem Papier simulieren wir die Auswirkungen einer deutlichen Ausweitung der Hinzuverdienstmöglichkeiten für Bezieher/-innen der Grundsicherung für Arbeitsuchende (SGB II) auf das Arbeitsangebot, die öffentlichen Haushalte und die Zahl der Leistungsbeziehenden. Die Analyse beruht auf einem statischen Mikrosimulationsmodell (IAB-MSM), das ein ökonometrisches Arbeitsangebotsmodell beinhaltet und Daten des Sozioökonomischen Panel (SOEP) verwendet. Bei der Ermittlung der Effekte werden Wechselwirkungen mit den vorgelagerten Leistungen Wohngeld und Kinderzuschlag berücksichtigt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Arbeitsangebotseffekte moderat ausfallen, während die Effekte auf die Empfängerzahlen beim SGB II und bei Kinderzuschlag ebenso wie auf die Kosten dieser Leistungen deutlich sind. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass eine Verbesserung der Hinzuverdienstmöglichkeiten für Erwerbstätige aus einkommensschwachen Haushalten, ohne gleichzeitig die Zahl der Grundsicherungsbeziehenden deutlich auszuweiten, nur durch umfassende Reformen gelingen kann, die das gesamte Steuer- und Transfersystem betrachten.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"67 1","pages":"29 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47760874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Punishing the Poor and Fighting “Immigration into the Social System” – Welfare Reforms by the Conservative and Far-right Government in Austria 2017–2019 惩罚穷人和反对“移民进入社会体系”——2017年至2019年奥地利保守党和极右翼政府的福利改革

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2020-0022

Roland Atzmüller, Alban Knecht, Michael Bodenstein

{"title":"Punishing the Poor and Fighting “Immigration into the Social System” – Welfare Reforms by the Conservative and Far-right Government in Austria 2017–2019","authors":"Roland Atzmüller, Alban Knecht, Michael Bodenstein","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2020-0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2020-0022","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper analyses and assesses social policy reforms of the conservative, far-right and right-wing populist coalition government in Austria between 2017 and 2019 in the light of the debates about welfare chauvinist, authoritarian and populist social policies. The latter had gained in importance over the previous years due to the upsurge of far-right and right-wing populist parties and the (at least partial) accommodation of mainstream parties to this tendency in many countries. The policies of the government were based on the view that the social problems associated with immigration were (at least) one of the main underlying causes for the problems affecting the Austrian society. The paper shows that the government initiated strategies to tackle these developments via a renationalisation of social policies. The analysis is focused on implemented and planned activities geared mainly towards the (former) margins of the Austrian welfare regime (social assistance, active labour market policies, unemployment assistance, youth integration policies), as well as on the ideological articulations the government uttered to justify these reforms via the combination of welfare chauvinist orientations with centre-right concerns about market dynamics and public finances. Our analysis concludes that nativist/racialised, nationalist and welfare chauvinist social policies transcend the distinction of deserving and non-deserving social groups, which raises the question about the social imaginaries that lie beneath the attempts of far-right political actors to shape societies through the reform of welfare.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"66 1","pages":"525 - 552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zsr-2020-0022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45421314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

The Production of Precarity in Denmark’s Asylum Regime 丹麦庇护制度中不稳定因素的产生

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2020-0018

A. Lindberg

{"title":"The Production of Precarity in Denmark’s Asylum Regime","authors":"A. Lindberg","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2020-0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2020-0018","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The special issue discusses the intersections between social welfare and migration control, as well as how stratified access to welfare services is used to govern ‘unwanted’ groups. This article explores these intersections in Denmark’ deterrence-oriented asylum policy regime, analysing the discourses and practices whereby people seeking protection are constructed as ‘undeserving’ poor. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in different sites of enforcement of Denmark’s asylum regime as well as interviews with street-level workers and people who sought asylum in Denmark, I trace how the Danish deterrence approach operates through the production of poverty and precarity among people seeking protection in asylum reception camps, deportation-oriented integration programmes, and finally, deportation camps. I show how the Danish welfare state, as a result of the merging of external and internal bordering practices, produces a condition of precarity and (non)deportability that extends from the asylum camps to those awarded temporary protection status. Hence, while the deterrence-oriented Danish policy regime has not proven ‘effective’ from the point of view of immigration control, it has served to reinforced a dualised, hierarchically ordered welfare rights’ regime that gradually erodes the rights and life opportunities of unwanted noncitizen ‘others’.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"66 1","pages":"413 - 439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zsr-2020-0018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49421494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Frontmatter Frontmatter

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2020-frontmatter4

引用次数: 0

Child Money and Food Stamps: A comparative analysis of Mongolian welfare programmes in the Ger Districts of Ulaanbaatar 儿童货币和食品券：乌兰巴托格尔区蒙古国福利方案的比较分析

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2020-0021

Elizabeth Fox

{"title":"Child Money and Food Stamps: A comparative analysis of Mongolian welfare programmes in the Ger Districts of Ulaanbaatar","authors":"Elizabeth Fox","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2020-0021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2020-0021","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Until recently, the Mongolian welfare system was entirely category based. However, a new food stamps programme funded by loans from the Asian Development Bank, which targets aid according to proxy means testing, has been introduced as part of the bank’s aim to push Mongolia towards a fiscally sustainable welfare model. The food stamps programme is presented as efficient and responsible in contrast to Mongolia’s universal child money programme. Based on long-term participant observation research in the ger districts of Ulaanbaatar, areas inhabited by many rural-urban migrants living in poverty, this paper compares the two programmes, interweaving street-level accounts of the experiences of residents and bureaucrats alike with the respective histories and funding sources of the two programmes. Doing so provides a multi-level analysis of the emergent welfare state in Mongolia, unpicking the ‘system’ that ger district residents encounter, linking the relative influence of international financial institutions to democratic and economic cycles, and offering a critique of the supposed efficiency of targeted welfare programmes.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"66 1","pages":"499 - 524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zsr-2020-0021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49323638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Editorial: Governing the Poor – Migration and Poverty 社论:治理穷人——移民与贫困

Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2020-0016

L. Borrelli, Yann Bochsler

{"title":"Editorial: Governing the Poor – Migration and Poverty","authors":"L. Borrelli, Yann Bochsler","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2020-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2020-0016","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In contrast to the nexus between welfare and migration control, the link between migration and poverty (or rather the perception of poverty), has not received the same amount of political interest, but also public and scholarly attention. Yet, there are multiple ways in which migrants are rendered or perceived as poor in receiving states after having migrated. Hence, this special issue addresses the intersection of migration and poverty. The contributions cover various socio-legal, political and discursive aspects of how state institutions and non-state agencies address, and how poor citizens and migrant individuals in the broadest sense deal with, precariousness and discrimination in the states where they have settled or within which they have moved. In public and political discourse, migrant individuals are often portrayed as underserving, needy and dependent on the ‘receiving states’. Yet, what is often overlooked is how this assumed dependency is constructed by policies and laws, encouraged by media practices and everyday street-level implementation, to the degree that it demonises the foreign ‘other’, accused of misusing welfare assistance. At the same time, we find similar framings regarding marginalised citizens, such as welfare recipients, which discloses the moral character of social policies and a hierarchy of deservingness-recognition. Within the special issue, we critically discuss how such representations and policy mechanisms allow for the discriminatory circumscription of rights and services of the ‘poor’ and migrants that are deeply embedded in welfare chauvinist attitudes, causing significant control and surveillance by the state.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"66 1","pages":"363 - 385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zsr-2020-0016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48607583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5