Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap最新文献_第9页

Nogle betragtninger om bevisbyrde, undersøgelsespligt og reklamation 关于举证责任、调查义务和申诉的几点思考

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-12-09 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-05-03

Kim Frost

引用次数: 0

Rettslige friheter 公平

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-12-09 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-05-01

JohanVorland Wibye

引用次数: 0

Amund Bjøranger Tørum: Interpretation of Commercial Contracts 金额:商业合同的解释

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-12-09 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-05-06

IngerB. Ørstavik

引用次数: 0

Markus Jerkø: Bevisvurderingens rettslige rammer – bevistema, bevisbyrde, beviskrav Markus Jerkø：证据评估的法律框架——证据主体、举证责任、证明要求

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-12-09 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-05-04

Christian Dahlman

引用次数: 0

Talepresentasjon i straffedommer 说话以示惩罚

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-12-09 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-05-02

Espen Ingebrigtsen

引用次数: 1

Har forordninger direkte virkning under EØS-avtalen? 根据E E E S协议，订单有直接作用吗？

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-03-04-04

Tarjei Bekkedal

引用次数: 0

Är den nordiska rättskulturella tanketraditionen ofullgången?

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-03-04-01

Claes Martinson

引用次数: 0

Increasing Openness of Court Proceedings?* 提高法庭程序的公开性?＊

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-03-04-03

Maija Dahlberg

{"title":"Increasing Openness of Court Proceedings?*","authors":"Maija Dahlberg","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-03-04-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-03-04-03","url":null,"abstract":"This article concentrates on the openness of court proceedings, in particular on public access to court documents at the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The current presumption by the ECJ is that third-party access to the ECJ’s submissions may undermine the sound administration of justice and the equality of arms principle, whereas in the ECHR system, court documents including parties’ submissions are made public as a rule, both in pending and closed cases. Accordingly, it seems that the two sibling European courts have adopted fully opposing approaches to the third-party right of access to court files. There are serious arguments for the ECJ to change its current approach, as the public’s right of access to court documents increases the justification of court cases: it strengthens the justificatory force of court judgments, and finally the legitimacy and accountability of the court itself, since it reveals more arguments based on which judges deliberate, but which are absent from the final judgment. In addition, there are some practical deficiencies in the ECtHR proceedings relating to third-party access to court documents that make the promise of transparent court hard to fulfil.","PeriodicalId":83332,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41450413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ole-Andreas Rognstad: Property Aspects of Intellectual Property Ole-Andreas Rognstad:知识产权的产权方面

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-03-04-05

Geir Stenseth, Are Stenvik

引用次数: 0

Omgåelse i aksjeselskapsretten*

Tidsskrift for rettsvidenskap Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-03-04-02

Henrik Skar

引用次数: 0