{"title":"Feminism and Social Policy","authors":"Mary Mcintosh","doi":"10.4324/9781003073246-27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073246-27","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75591245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Welfare State: A Self-Inflicted Crisis?","authors":"R. Klein","doi":"10.4324/9781003073246-15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073246-15","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75956940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Supreme Court 1968 Term","authors":"Frank I. Michelman","doi":"10.4324/9781003073246-19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073246-19","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73845341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Welfare Benefits, Administrative Discretion, and the Politics of the ‘New Urban Left’","authors":"I. Loveland","doi":"10.4324/9781003073246-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073246-24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"440 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78176930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Positive Functions of Poverty 1","authors":"H. Gans","doi":"10.4324/9781003073246-13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073246-13","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84500640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Gender Basis of American Social Policy","authors":"V. Sapiro","doi":"10.2307/2151389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2151389","url":null,"abstract":"During the last quarter of the nineteenth century, womenthousands of them -became increasingly organized and active in the attempt to promote the general welfare, especially by helping the most vulnerable members of society. As individual leaders and as group participants they were instrumental in organizing and nationalizing movements for public health (mental and physical), poor relief, penal and other institutional reform, education for the previously uneducated, and child welfare. As the nineteenth century waned and the twentieth dawned, women were prominent among proponents of a principle which was hitherto nearly alien to American ideology but which has now, a century later, come to be an accepted part of our political views: the government and, they increasingly argued, the national government, have a responsibility to promote the general welfare actively by providing initiative and support where necessary. The degree and types of support remain, perhaps more now than then, matters of profound political contention, but in the late twentieth century even the most conservative ideologues tend to agree that government must provide a \"safety net\" for its people. The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was also a time during which thousands of women, many of them the same as those involved in the general welfare movements, were agitating to promote women's welfare specifically. I The","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"04 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86463386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Consent to examination in child sexual abuse: a Scottish perspective.","authors":"A Busuttil, A M Smith","doi":"10.1080/09649069008413921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069008413921","url":null,"abstract":"(1990). Consent to examination in child sexual abuse: A scottish perspective. The Journal of Social Welfare Law: Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 385-393.","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":" 6","pages":"385-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09649069008413921","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24913490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Surrogacy: giving it an understood name.","authors":"D. Morgan","doi":"10.1080/09649068808412081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649068808412081","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Surrogacy has appeared at the eye of the storm surrounding assisted reproduction. The lightning rod for the controversy which has engulfed it in the United Kingdom was the well publicised case of Re A Baby, the “Baby Cotton” case in January 1985.' Even though it does not necessarily demand the most technologically sophisticated contribution to conception, nor is it presently thought to be the most statistically significant response to infertility, surrogacy has become the whipping post for the moral backlash against what is seen as the brave new world of technological rationality and scientific finality. It is seen to cut clearly into fundamental values; to disturb cherished ideals of personal integrity, family life and national security. It is identified as a time bomb primed to explode in the course of the “reproduction revolution.”2","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"4 1","pages":"216-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09649068808412081","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59897034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The debate on surrogate motherhood: the current situation, some arguments and issues; questions facing law and policy.","authors":"L M Harding","doi":"10.1080/09649068708412160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649068708412160","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent incidents where a woman has intentionally conceived and borne a child by a man for that man and his partner to possess and bring up have attracted a great deal of media excitement and general public concern and debate. The last few years have also seen the publication of the Warnock Committee's Report on “Human Fertilisation and Embryology”1 which discusses surrogate mother practices among other related questions, the passing of an Act outlawing commercial arrangements for surrogacy, and the introduction of a Bill in the Lords outlawing all surrogacy arrangements. At the same time the pace of change in the field of reproductive technology has raised similar challenges to those posed by surrogate motherhood, dilemmas which child-care law and policy need to address. This occurs against a back-drop of intensified debate in the 1970s and 1980s about the general direction of policy and practice in relation to children and their parents or parent substitutes. Recent manifestations of this debate...","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"1987 ","pages":"37-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09649068708412160","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"26272627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Welfare, Rights and Discretion","authors":"R. Goodin","doi":"10.1093/OJLS/6.2.232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OJLS/6.2.232","url":null,"abstract":"Theorists in a variety of disciplines have, for quite some time now, been saying that a-perhaps the-defining feature of the welfare state is its commitment to providing a certain range of goods and services to its citizens 'as of right'.' From T. H. Marshall's classic lectures on 'Citizenship and Social Class' forward, we have grown accustomed to tracing the history of the welfare state in terms of the expanding 'rights of citizenship'.2 From the welfare rights movement of the I96os onward, we have grown accustomed to thinking of welfare rights as the clear alternatives to more odious forms of official discretion. And so on.","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88801873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}