Saint Louis University public law review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: disease control or child objectification? 胚胎植入前遗传学诊断:疾病控制还是儿童物化?
Rebecca Knox
{"title":"Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: disease control or child objectification?","authors":"Rebecca Knox","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82633,"journal":{"name":"Saint Louis University public law review","volume":"22 2","pages":"435-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24579283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: reversal of the Department of Justice's position on physician assisted suicide and the ensuing court battle. 俄勒冈州尊严死亡法案:司法部对医生协助自杀的立场和随后的法庭之战的逆转。
Richard J Brumbaugh
{"title":"The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: reversal of the Department of Justice's position on physician assisted suicide and the ensuing court battle.","authors":"Richard J Brumbaugh","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82633,"journal":{"name":"Saint Louis University public law review","volume":"21 2","pages":"377-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24579282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain't always easy! An African American perspective on bioethics. 奴隶制、种族隔离和种族主义:信任医疗保健系统并不总是那么容易!非裔美国人对生命伦理学的看法。
Saint Louis University public law review Pub Date : 1996-01-01 DOI: 10.13016/3BVX-KLEU
V. Randall
{"title":"Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain't always easy! An African American perspective on bioethics.","authors":"V. Randall","doi":"10.13016/3BVX-KLEU","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13016/3BVX-KLEU","url":null,"abstract":"Many people are surprised at the level of distrust of the health care system held by African Americans. However, fear and distrust of the health care system is a natural and logical response to the history of experimentation and abuse. The fear and distrust shape our lives and, consequently, our perspectives. 2 That perspective keeps African Americans from getting health care treatment, from participating in medical research, from signing living wills, and from donating organs. That perspective affects the health care that African Americans receive. This fear and distrust is rarely acknowledged in traditional bioethical discourse. Some bioethicists question the existence of a \"uniquely\" African American bioethical perspective. 3 They maintain that since the values and beliefs held by African Americans are also held by other oppressed groups, such as Native Americans, there is no African American perspective. However, these traditional bioethicists miss (or ignore) an important point: perspective is merely a subjective evaluation of the relative significance of something -- a point-of-view. 4 Thus, to acknowledge an African American perspective, it is not necessary that African American values and belief systems be entirely different from others. It is faulty to assume that any group shares exactly the same value system with other groups. For example, Americans do not have one ethical perspective. Rather, race, class, and gender modify the commonality of the American experience. Different groups have had different experiences that, at a minimum, modify the dominant American perspective, if not replace it with an ...","PeriodicalId":82633,"journal":{"name":"Saint Louis University public law review","volume":"15 2 1","pages":"191-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66541462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82
Gender and culture in the globalization of bioethics. 生物伦理学全球化中的性别与文化。
Saint Louis University public law review Pub Date : 1996-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9781003073789-1
C. Gudorf
{"title":"Gender and culture in the globalization of bioethics.","authors":"C. Gudorf","doi":"10.4324/9781003073789-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073789-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82633,"journal":{"name":"Saint Louis University public law review","volume":"15 2 1","pages":"331-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70619640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. 计划生育联合会诉凯西案:最高法院对理性的逃避。
Saint Louis University public law review Pub Date : 1993-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3201636
Paul Benjamin Linton
{"title":"Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.","authors":"Paul Benjamin Linton","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3201636","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3201636","url":null,"abstract":"In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, a bare majority of the Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe v. Wade. Although Roe was not directly implicated by any of the statutes challenged in Casey, all of which could have been upheld without overruling Roe, the Justices agreed to reexamine Roe because of the uncertainty regarding its continued viability and the need to provide guidance to state and federal courts and state legislatures. The result of this reexamination, however, was a badly divided Court that could not muster a majority in support of any standard of re-","PeriodicalId":82633,"journal":{"name":"Saint Louis University public law review","volume":"13 1 1","pages":"15-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68573816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Financial penalties for failing to honor patient wishes to refuse treatment. 对不尊重病人意愿拒绝治疗的经济处罚。
M R Gasner
{"title":"Financial penalties for failing to honor patient wishes to refuse treatment.","authors":"M R Gasner","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82633,"journal":{"name":"Saint Louis University public law review","volume":"11 ","pages":"499-520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25214303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade. 两艘船在夜里经过:对罗伊诉韦德案中怀特-史蒂文斯对话的解释性回顾。
D J Horan, C D Forsythe, E R Grant
{"title":"Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade.","authors":"D J Horan, C D Forsythe, E R Grant","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82633,"journal":{"name":"Saint Louis University public law review","volume":"6 2","pages":"229-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24945486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信