Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain't always easy! An African American perspective on bioethics.

V. Randall
{"title":"Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain't always easy! An African American perspective on bioethics.","authors":"V. Randall","doi":"10.13016/3BVX-KLEU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many people are surprised at the level of distrust of the health care system held by African Americans. However, fear and distrust of the health care system is a natural and logical response to the history of experimentation and abuse. The fear and distrust shape our lives and, consequently, our perspectives. 2 That perspective keeps African Americans from getting health care treatment, from participating in medical research, from signing living wills, and from donating organs. That perspective affects the health care that African Americans receive. This fear and distrust is rarely acknowledged in traditional bioethical discourse. Some bioethicists question the existence of a \"uniquely\" African American bioethical perspective. 3 They maintain that since the values and beliefs held by African Americans are also held by other oppressed groups, such as Native Americans, there is no African American perspective. However, these traditional bioethicists miss (or ignore) an important point: perspective is merely a subjective evaluation of the relative significance of something -- a point-of-view. 4 Thus, to acknowledge an African American perspective, it is not necessary that African American values and belief systems be entirely different from others. It is faulty to assume that any group shares exactly the same value system with other groups. For example, Americans do not have one ethical perspective. Rather, race, class, and gender modify the commonality of the American experience. Different groups have had different experiences that, at a minimum, modify the dominant American perspective, if not replace it with an ...","PeriodicalId":82633,"journal":{"name":"Saint Louis University public law review","volume":"15 2 1","pages":"191-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saint Louis University public law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13016/3BVX-KLEU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Many people are surprised at the level of distrust of the health care system held by African Americans. However, fear and distrust of the health care system is a natural and logical response to the history of experimentation and abuse. The fear and distrust shape our lives and, consequently, our perspectives. 2 That perspective keeps African Americans from getting health care treatment, from participating in medical research, from signing living wills, and from donating organs. That perspective affects the health care that African Americans receive. This fear and distrust is rarely acknowledged in traditional bioethical discourse. Some bioethicists question the existence of a "uniquely" African American bioethical perspective. 3 They maintain that since the values and beliefs held by African Americans are also held by other oppressed groups, such as Native Americans, there is no African American perspective. However, these traditional bioethicists miss (or ignore) an important point: perspective is merely a subjective evaluation of the relative significance of something -- a point-of-view. 4 Thus, to acknowledge an African American perspective, it is not necessary that African American values and belief systems be entirely different from others. It is faulty to assume that any group shares exactly the same value system with other groups. For example, Americans do not have one ethical perspective. Rather, race, class, and gender modify the commonality of the American experience. Different groups have had different experiences that, at a minimum, modify the dominant American perspective, if not replace it with an ...
奴隶制、种族隔离和种族主义:信任医疗保健系统并不总是那么容易!非裔美国人对生命伦理学的看法。
许多人对非裔美国人对医疗体系的不信任程度感到惊讶。然而,对卫生保健系统的恐惧和不信任是对实验和滥用历史的自然和合乎逻辑的反应。恐惧和不信任塑造了我们的生活,也因此塑造了我们的观点。这种观点使非裔美国人无法获得医疗保健治疗,无法参与医学研究,无法签署生前遗嘱,也无法捐献器官。这种观点影响了非裔美国人接受的医疗保健。这种恐惧和不信任在传统的生物伦理话语中很少得到承认。一些生物伦理学家质疑是否存在一种“独特的”非裔美国人生物伦理学观点。他们认为,由于非裔美国人持有的价值观和信仰与其他受压迫群体(如印第安人)持有的价值观和信仰相同,因此不存在非裔美国人的观点。然而,这些传统的生物伦理学家错过(或忽略)了一个重要的观点:观点仅仅是对事物相对重要性的主观评价——一种观点。因此,要承认非裔美国人的观点,非裔美国人的价值观和信仰体系并不一定与其他人完全不同。假设任何一个群体与其他群体拥有完全相同的价值体系是错误的。例如,美国人没有单一的道德观。相反,种族、阶级和性别改变了美国经历的共性。不同的群体有不同的经历,这些经历至少改变了美国的主流观点,如果不是用一种……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信