{"title":"A Legal Response to the Sovereign Citizen Movement","authors":"Caesar Kalinowski Iv","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3238417","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3238417","url":null,"abstract":"From fringe on the flag to capitalization of certain words, Sovereign Citizens routinely defy normal conventions of legal and constitutional analysis when interacting with the United States’ legal system. Sometimes that defiance is seen as merely humorous or tediously confusing; however, many Sovereign Citizens also employ violence and “paper terrorism” to support their claims of autonomy from the government. Unsurprisingly, most courts brusquely dismiss the group’s rhetoric as meritless or frivolous. But such a terse dismissal betrays one important point: The Sovereign Citizen movement is made up of thousands of U.S. citizens that distrust the federal government and are actively trying to limit its power through reference to the Constitution. \u0000This article seeks to fill an understanding and communication gap by providing civil servants, law enforcement, and the judiciary with a comprehensive reference guide to the Sovereign Citizen’s major claims and their failings under the Constitution. To do so, the article refutes Sovereign Citizen claims regarding: \u0000(1) the jurisdiction of the federal government over actual flesh and blood citizens; \u0000(2) the ability to tax citizens and redeeming the “strawman” (the so-called “Redemption Scheme”); and \u0000(3) the individual’s completely unencumbered right to travel.","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"80 1","pages":"153-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45085497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Separation of Electoral Powers","authors":"E. Foley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2209077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2209077","url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that the political theory of republicanism needs to be updated to take account of the distinct role that election law plays in the establishing of the government that makes and enforces the rest of the laws for society. Updating republicanism in this way requires adding a new dimension to the separation of powers, a traditionally republican idea. The new dimension is to separate the electoral powers of government from the three traditional powers: legislative, executive, and judicial. In addition, the electoral powers should be subdivided into three distinct institutions in the same way that the regular powers of government are. The essay describes the three new electoral institutions that would be created in accordance with this updating of republican theory. The essay also considers the distinctive institutional innovations that have occurred, since the development of traditional republican theory, with the rise of administrative law. Accordingly, this essay also sketches a fourth electoral institution to play an intermediary administrative role between the legislation and execution of election laws.","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"74 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67991949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Death with dignity in Montana.","authors":"James E Dallner, D Scott Manning","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"65 1","pages":"309-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25598019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Debating the Field Civil Code 105 Years Late","authors":"Andrew P. Morriss, S. Burnham, James C. Nelson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1963442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1963442","url":null,"abstract":"The State of Montana enacted the Field Code in 1895 without a great deal of debate. My research led me to the conclusion that this codification of the common law has done nothing but harm to Montana Law. Prof. Andrew Morriss, an authority on the Field Code, graciously agreed to introduce a debate between myself and Justice James C. Nelson of the Montana Supreme Court on the issue of whether the Field Code has been beneficial to Montana. This article contains Morriss’s introduction and a footnoted transcript of the debate.","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"61 1","pages":"371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67814672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The last best place to die: physician-assisted suicide and Montana's constitutional right to personal autonomy privacy.","authors":"S A Fisk","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"59 2","pages":"301-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24088326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.","authors":"M B Hayhurst","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"58 2","pages":"565-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25598018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.","authors":"W E Hunt","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"54 2","pages":"339-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25598013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Civil Procedure and Evidence","authors":"Kenneth R Dyrud","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvqsdsxh.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqsdsxh.8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"42 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1981-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68854980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Jurisdictional Problems of Foreign Divorce Decrees under the Full Faith and Credit Clause","authors":"Sandra Muckelston","doi":"10.2307/1109494","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1109494","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":82046,"journal":{"name":"Montana law review","volume":"31 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1969-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1109494","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68208599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}