American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation最新文献_第4页

Fundamental Corporate Changes, Minority Shareholders, and Business Purposes 基本的公司变化，少数股东和商业目的

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1980-01-20 DOI: 10.1086/491883

W. Carney

引用次数: 16

Lawmaking and Public Opinion Research: The President and Patrick Caddell 立法和民意研究:总统和帕特里克·卡德尔

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1980-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.1980.TB01115.X

H. Zeisel

引用次数: 2

The Human Subjects Protection Committee: an experiment in decentralized federal regulation. 人类受试者保护委员会:分散联邦监管的实验。

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1979-07-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.1979.TB01029.X

J. S. DuVal

引用次数: 8

[Book Review: Lawyers and the Pursuit of Legal Rights Joel F. Handler, Ellen Jane Hollingsworth, Howard S. Erlanger] [书评:律师与法律权利的追求乔尔·f·汉德勒，艾伦·简·霍林沃思，霍华德·s·厄兰格]

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1979-01-23 DOI: 10.1086/491880

S. J. Brakel

引用次数: 1

[Book Review: Thomas Jefferson and the Law Edward Dumbauld] [书评:托马斯·杰斐逊与法律爱德华·邓堡]

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1979-01-23 DOI: 10.1086/491879

Barlow F. Christensen

引用次数: 0

Edward Dumbauld, Thomas Jefferson and the Law. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1979. Pp. xv + 293. 爱德华·邓伯德，托马斯·杰斐逊与法律。诺曼:俄克拉荷马大学出版社，1979年。页15 + 293。

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1979-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.1979.TB01034.X

Barlow F. Christensen

引用次数: 1

The Jury Selection in the Mitchell‐Stans Conspiracy Trial 米切尔-斯坦斯合谋案的陪审团选择

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1976-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00954.X

H. Zeisel, S. Diamond

{"title":"The Jury Selection in the Mitchell‐Stans Conspiracy Trial","authors":"H. Zeisel, S. Diamond","doi":"10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00954.X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00954.X","url":null,"abstract":"This is a study of the voir dire proceedings in the trial of the United States v. John Mitchell and Maurice Stans in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the spring of 1974 (docket no. 73 Cr. 439). The major charge was conspiracy to impede a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation of Robert L. Vesco, a financier, a fugitive at the time of the trial, in return for a $200,000 cash contribution to President Nixon's reelection campaign.' The sheer scope of the proceedings was unusual; 196 prospective jurors were examined, producing a record of over 2,000 pages. A great amount of statistical data and an unusual report on the jury's deliberations2 promised insights of some value. In other ways too, the case was not an ordinary one. Both defendants had been members of President Nixon's cabinet, as attorney general and secretary of commerce, respectively. Some of their alleged misdeeds, not totally unrelated to the ones under indictment in the case, had been aired before nationwide television audiences; both defendants and their main accuser, John Dean, had testified before Senator Ervin's Watergate Committee. Because of its public exposure, the judge desired to sequester the jury. This decision seemed to have been prompted by an expected","PeriodicalId":80417,"journal":{"name":"American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation","volume":"1 1","pages":"151-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1976-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00954.X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63267587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 26

Computer‐Assisted Legal Research—An Analysis of Full‐Text Document Retrieval Systems, Particularly the LEXIS System 计算机辅助法律研究——全文文件检索系统的分析，特别是LEXIS系统

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1976-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00955.X

J. Sprowl

引用次数: 16

Market Funds and Trust-Investment Law 市场基金与信托投资法

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1976-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00951.X

John H. Langbein, R. Posner

{"title":"Market Funds and Trust-Investment Law","authors":"John H. Langbein, R. Posner","doi":"10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00951.X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00951.X","url":null,"abstract":"investment funds that have abandoned the traditional attempt to \"beat the market\" by picking and choosing among securities-buying stocks or bonds that they believe to be undervalued and selling those they believe to be overvalued. Instead, they create and hold essentially unchanged a portfolio of securities that is designed to approximate some index of market performance such as the Standard & Poor's 500. The S&P 500 is a hypothetical portfolio consisting of 500 major nonfinancial companies on the New York Stock Exchange weighted by the market value of each company's total outstanding shares. Batterymarch Financial Management Corporation in its Market Portfolio holds a 250-stock selection from the S&P 500 designed to track the performance of the S&P 500 very closely. Two major banks, American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago and Wells Fargo Bank, have created market funds in their trust departments. And several large pension funds, including those of several Bell Telephone Companies and of Exxon, have recently placed a portion of their assets in such funds. The rise of the market fund reflects growing dissatisfaction with the performance of conventional investment funds, which sacrifice diversification and incur heavy research and transaction costs in an apparently","PeriodicalId":80417,"journal":{"name":"American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1976-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00951.X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63267532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 26

Medical Malpractice: The Case for Contract 医疗事故:合同案例

American Bar Foundation research journal. American Bar Foundation Pub Date : 1976-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.1976.TB00953.X

R. Epstein

引用次数: 52