{"title":"Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension.","authors":"J E Carter","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The preferred therapy for genuine stress incontinence is surgery. The Burch procedure is considered by many to be the gold standard for surgical treatment of genuine stress incontinence. The Burch procedure requires the elevation of the anterior wall of the vagina to the level of the origin of the paravaginal fascia by suspension from Cooper's ligaments (iliopectineal ligaments). A properly performed Burch procedure cures 93 percent. The laparoscopic performance of the Burch procedure results in a decrease in the length of hospital stay, faster recovery, and less scarring due to the smaller incisions. In a consecutive series of thirty patients the average length of stay in hospital was thirty-six hours and the patients were able to return to non-stressful regular activities within one week of surgery. There were no conversions to the open Burch procedure. Intraoperative and postoperative complications included one electrocautery injury of the bladder requiring laparoscopic suture reinforcement of the bladder and three weeks of bladder drainage, three episodes of transient detrusor instability requiring medical therapy for two months, and two episodes of urinary retention requiring bladder drainage for two weeks. The laparoscopic procedure provides results similar to the open operation if a meticulous technique is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18557008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disposable versus reusable instrumentation.","authors":"G J Maddern, J R Bessell","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18560353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.","authors":"T Swem, R Fazzalari","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report represents findings concerning the economic impact of laparoscopic surgery. Specifically, the study addresses hospital costs, and not the hospital charges often given attention by studies in the literature. Hospital expenditures for the equipment and instrumentation required for laparoscopic surgery are important cost factors in laparoscopic surgery. Data for determining hospital costs was obtained from nine hospitals throughout the United States. At each hospital, a research team spent four to five days interviewing surgeons, OR staff, hospital administrators and other personnel as well as gathering data. Analysis of operating room equipment and supplies indicates that single-use laparoscopic instruments are a cost-effective alternative to reusable instruments. In addition, single-use instruments have many benefits that were not possible to quantify accurately in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18557004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Subtotal hysterectomy revisited.","authors":"C Sutton","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advent of laparoscopic surgery has enabled gynaecologists to re-evaluate the traditional approaches to hysterectomy. Until the 1940's hysterectomy involved retaining the cervix because the simpler operation avoided damage to the ureter and prevented ascending infection, which was an important consideration before the advent of antibiotics. In order to reduce the risk of developing cervical carcinoma the cervix was traditionally removed at hysterectomy over the last 50 years. Since it is possible to remove the area where cervical carcinoma develops and with the development of an effective screening programme for cervical carcinoma, this needs no longer to be a consideration. A more logical approach to laparoscopic hysterectomy would be to retain the cervix but remove the transformation zone and in so doing there is less risk to the ureter, less postoperative urinary dysfunction, virtually no disturbance to the lower genital tract, thus resulting in little or no impairment of sexual enjoyment.</p>","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18560346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
D Wallwiener, E M Grischke, S Rimbach, A Maleika, G Bastert
{"title":"Endoscopic retropubic colposuspension: \"Retziusscopy\" versus laparoscopy--a reasonable enlargement of the operative spectrum in the management of recurrent stress incontinence?","authors":"D Wallwiener, E M Grischke, S Rimbach, A Maleika, G Bastert","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The technical feasibility of the laparoscopic and extraperitoneal approach to the Burch colposuspension for treatment of grade II and III (moderate to severe) stress incontinence was examined in a randomised prospective study. Irrespective of the endoscopic access, two suspension techniques, namely conventional suture and stapler fixation of alloplastic materials, were compared. A total of 20 patients entered this preliminary evaluation. Three complications occurred; a bladder perforation (during laparoscopic dissection of the space of Retzius), a postoperative detrusor instability and transient urinary retention. Both the endoscopic approaches and the suspension procedures employed proved feasible and safe, and presented the advantages of a \"minimal access\" procedure, with short hospitalisation and rapid recovery. Short-term follow-up (6-12 months) showed subjective and objective results comparable to those of the conventional abdominal Burch colposuspension. Detailed evaluation of the subgroups is not yet feasible, as the number of patients in this preliminary evaluation was too small and follow-up too short. Final evaluation of the entire study population and long-term follow-up will be necessary before these procedures can be generally offered as a therapeutic alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18560349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disposable and reusable instruments.","authors":"G J Maddern, J R Bessell","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18557009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J Keckstein, G Buck, V Sasse, F Tuttlies, U Ulrich
{"title":"Laparoscopic creation of a neovagina: modified Vecchietti method.","authors":"J Keckstein, G Buck, V Sasse, F Tuttlies, U Ulrich","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A new surgical technique for the treatment of vaginal aplasia is described. It consists of a modification of Vecchietti's method, allowing laparoscopic performance of the operation. 9 patients have been treated in this way since January, 1991 with good results. No complications were seen. Being virtually atraumatic, this method requires only brief hospitalisation, which is of vital importance in view of the psychological and physical problems this particular condition entails. Results are identical, so that this technique should always take precedence over the conventional Vecchietti method.</p>","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18559570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Further refinements of the polyp snare for interuterine surgery--a new modality for treatment of myomas and polyps.","authors":"B McLucas","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hysteroscopic treatment of 30 patients suffering from menorrhagia or post-partum complications was accomplished using an electrosurgical polyp snare. Using this method, 18 polyps and 12 myomas were successfully removed in less than twenty minutes without complications. Local anaesthesia was used in 12 patients. Three patients have presented with recurrence of menorrhagia, with a minimum of six months follow-up. Benefits of this technique compared to uterine resectoscopy include shorter operative time, decreased risk of fluid overload, and less risk of uterine perforation. The snare is difficult to use and a learning curve exists. Higher currents than that used for resection are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18560350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Multifunctional instrument for operative laparoscopy: technical, experimental and clinical results in gynaecology.","authors":"D Wallwiener, B Stumpf, G Bastert, W Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whilst endoscopic surgical procedures are getting increasingly more complex, in the various surgical disciplines mono- and bifunctional instruments are only slowly being replaced by multifunctional ones. Therefore a complex, intelligent system was developed, the central part of which is a multifunctional instrument. All basic functions necessary for surgical laparoscopy are integrated and comprise: cutting electrodes (unipolar and bipolar) which can be advanced or retracted pneumatically; coagulation forceps with mechanical control; and irrigation and suction devices. All 5 mm instruments can be used and there is an option for others, such as laser or aqua-dissection. The various functions are controlled via the handle of the multifunctional instrument which is connected to the electronic control unit, the MULTILAP system, which supplies the energy, material, and information flow required. In vivo standardised experiments in pigs were first performed to test the new instrument. Operation time was reduced by more than 20% when compared with the same procedure performed conventionally, during which frequent changing of instruments was necessary. Clinical application, without complications in all 30 patients (uterus preserving procedures or reconstructive tubo-ovarian surgery) confirmed the advantages of a multifunctional device, with optimised cutting and coagulation of vessels more than 1-2 mm in diameter, and reduced duration of operation. Safety and ergonomics were improved. Thus, an electronically controlled instrument with multifunctional working channels for lasers, ultrasound appliances, or mechanical instruments is available for application in all domains of operative laparoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18560351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.","authors":"S Straface","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The availability of single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation has been important for the adoption of laparoscopic surgery. Many surgeons were first introduced to laparoscopic surgery through the use of single-patient-use instrumentation. While there are reusable alternatives in most cases, many surgeons and operating room nurses still prefer single-patient-use instruments because they are sterile, safe, reliable, innovative in design, and always available. They also offer potential long-term hospital cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":79337,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"18557002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}