Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
[Brain death--a certain sign of death]. [脑死亡——死亡的某种迹象]。
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-10-01
H Angstwurm
{"title":"[Brain death--a certain sign of death].","authors":"H Angstwurm","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain death means a complete and irreversible loss of all brain activity during intensive care with mechanical ventilation. On autopsy is seen an ischemic infarct of the whole brain following the stopped blood flow in the intracranial cavity after the elevation of the pressure. With brain death a human being loses two characteristics of its earthly life, the physical base needed for his spirit and his soul in this world, and the integration, the unity as the independent and self-contained organism.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 4","pages":"4 p. following 502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13307368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Is brain death actually death?]. [脑死亡真的是死亡吗?]
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-10-01
J Seifert
{"title":"[Is brain death actually death?].","authors":"J Seifert","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper rejects \"brain death\" as a new criterion, or definition, of actual death. The main theses are two: 1. Brain death as such--in any of its meanings--is not man's death and this can be proven by means of many cogent and some plausible arguments. 2. Even if the theoretical arguments against the identification of man's actual death with brain death did not demonstrate their non-identity, the opposite position would still be uncertain, at least. In view of this undeniable fact, a minimal ethical responsibility demands that we must not act, by organ retrievals, on the assumption of the identity of \"brain death\"--in any of its meanings--with man's actual death. We must avoid those actions which, like killing, presuppose a high degree of moral certainty concerning death, given that we cannot attain such certainty, as in the case of brain death. Thus organ and heart-explantations are found to be unethical. A newly thought out notion of biological death of the human organism as a whole (\"clinical death\" as irreversible cessation of all vital bodily functions, in particular of cardiopulmonary and cerebral functions) is proposed as theoretically best founded and ethically safest medical criterion of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 4","pages":"4 p. preceding 503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13414982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Short definitions of medical concepts. 4. Brain death]. 医学概念的简短定义。4. 脑死亡)。
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-10-01
J G Meran
{"title":"[Short definitions of medical concepts. 4. Brain death].","authors":"J G Meran","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 4","pages":"1 p. preceding 503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13414980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Is brain death actually death?]. [脑死亡真的是死亡吗?]
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/MONIST199376210
J. Seifert
{"title":"[Is brain death actually death?].","authors":"J. Seifert","doi":"10.5840/MONIST199376210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/MONIST199376210","url":null,"abstract":"The paper rejects \"brain death\" as a new criterion, or definition, of actual death. The main theses are two: 1. Brain death as such--in any of its meanings--is not man's death and this can be proven by means of many cogent and some plausible arguments. 2. Even if the theoretical arguments against the identification of man's actual death with brain death did not demonstrate their non-identity, the opposite position would still be uncertain, at least. In view of this undeniable fact, a minimal ethical responsibility demands that we must not act, by organ retrievals, on the assumption of the identity of \"brain death\"--in any of its meanings--with man's actual death. We must avoid those actions which, like killing, presuppose a high degree of moral certainty concerning death, given that we cannot attain such certainty, as in the case of brain death. Thus organ and heart-explantations are found to be unethical. A newly thought out notion of biological death of the human organism as a whole (\"clinical death\" as irreversible cessation of all vital bodily functions, in particular of cardiopulmonary and cerebral functions) is proposed as theoretically best founded and ethically safest medical criterion of death.","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":"67 1","pages":"4 p. preceding 503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75898537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35
[Brain death from the viewpoint of transplantation surgery]. [从移植手术的角度看脑死亡]。
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-10-01
F W Eigler
{"title":"[Brain death from the viewpoint of transplantation surgery].","authors":"F W Eigler","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>If in the case of brain death breathing and circulation are continued artificially we deceive ourselves emotionally not to except death of the so treated organism. But on scientific medical grounds brain death defines the end of the organism as a whole beyond doubt. No rational reasons can be seen, why organs should not be taken from the brain dead provided that diagnosis of brain death and the organ retrieval are done by independent teams of doctors and an opposing will of the dead person is not known. Honour should be payed to the remains of the dead organ donor. Donation of living donors should be seen more critically because of the ethical problems involved for the managing doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 4","pages":"2 p. following 502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13414981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[First somatic human gene therapy in the USA approved]. 美国首例人体基因治疗获批。
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-09-01
J G Meran
{"title":"[First somatic human gene therapy in the USA approved].","authors":"J G Meran","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical protocol to treat infants with severe combined immuno deficiency due to adenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency by means of gene thereapy has been approved recently. The Human Gene Therapy Subcommittee and the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) concluded the review on July 30th and opened the door for the first federally approved somatic Human Gene Therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 3","pages":"2 p. following 428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13249819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Brief definition of medical ethical concepts. 3]. 医学伦理概念的简要定义。3)。
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-09-01
J G Meran
{"title":"[Brief definition of medical ethical concepts. 3].","authors":"J G Meran","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 3","pages":"1 p. preceding 429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13249818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Abortion and the experience for the physician who performs it]. [堕胎和实施堕胎的医生的经历]。
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-09-01
P Petersen
{"title":"[Abortion and the experience for the physician who performs it].","authors":"P Petersen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 3","pages":"2 p. preceding 429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13249820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Discussion forum medical ethics. B2. Physician's oath: still current? Critical observations on various professional ethical oath texts]. [讨论论坛医学伦理学。]B2。医生的誓言:还有效吗?对各种职业道德誓言文本的批判性观察]。
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-07-01
W U Eckart
{"title":"[Discussion forum medical ethics. B2. Physician's oath: still current? Critical observations on various professional ethical oath texts].","authors":"W U Eckart","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Topicality, expressiveness and universal validity of current ethical vows in medicine are compared critically. Instead of outmoded formula Pellegrino's and Thomasma's suggestion for a new and mainly at patient autonomy-oriented vow is favored.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 2","pages":"3 p. following 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13356599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Discussion forum medical ethics. B7. Essence of the oath. Reflections on the substance of the oath]. [讨论论坛医学伦理学。]B7。誓言的精髓。对宣誓内容的反思]。
Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1990-07-01
A von Aretin
{"title":"[Discussion forum medical ethics. B7. Essence of the oath. Reflections on the substance of the oath].","authors":"A von Aretin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There can be no oath, which does not possess a very special quality of obligation. Inseparably from this, there must be a justification stage which includes transcendental references.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 2","pages":"3 p. preceding 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13356600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信