Michiel van de Pavert, Jessica Duncan, David Ludwig
{"title":"“It feels regenerative”: An affective atmosphere of soil care in vegetable gardening","authors":"Michiel van de Pavert, Jessica Duncan, David Ludwig","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10973-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10973-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soils are on the political agenda, recognized as central actors for agricultural transitions. At the same time, soils are often difficult for humans to relate to. This paradox—soil as central to sustainability but distant to most humans—motivates the question: what regenerative soil relations emerge from the practice of soil care in vegetable gardening? To answer this, our study draws from twelve months of ethnographic fieldwork at two vegetable gardens in Luxembourg to elaborate on the affective dimension of soil care. The prolonged engagement allows for an analysis of the caring practices and the collective affective relations that emerge from them. Gardeners enact respect for the soil through their practices to create the conditions for soil life to flourish. In addition, collective dynamics can create a vibrant and uplifting affective atmosphere. Rather than igniting passion for soils in individuals, we argue that the paradox of soil relations is best addressed collectively, by nurturing practices of respect and immersions in an affective atmosphere. It is crucial to move beyond individual responsibility for the agricultural transitions and to engage people affectively through collective forms of participation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10973-8.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149132150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dana Simmons: On Hunger: Violence and craving in America, from starvation to Ozempic","authors":"Teresa Mares","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10956-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10956-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This book review offers an analysis of Dana Simmons’ recent book <i>On Hunger.</i></p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149132263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Make grow and let sweat: greenhouse technologies and climate risks among Romanian migrant farmworkers in Eastern Austria","authors":"Paul Sperneac-Wolfer","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10974-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10974-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-tech greenhouses are increasingly promoted as forms of “protected cultivation” capable of safeguarding food production under conditions of climate change. This article problematizes that assumption. Drawing on long-term ethnographic research with Romanian migrant farmworkers, as well as interviews with growers and horticultural consultants in an Eastern Austrian greenhouse cluster, I examine how greenhouse technologies and social inequities reshape occupational climate risks, and how their impacts on farmworker health are often normalized, downplayed, or institutionally misrecognized. Bringing together biopolitical scholarship and critical heat studies, I argue that the capacitation of plants is linked to the debilitation of worker bodies - a dynamic I describe as “make grow and let sweat”. By foregrounding workers’ embodied experiences, the article contributes to debates on agrotechnology, climate adaptation, and labor justice, arguing that climate-resilient farming can displace its bodily burdens onto migrant farmworkers and their families. These findings show why worker health must be central to assessments of climate-smart agricultural technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10974-7.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149132216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Combining inventories for ethical action: lessons from using ‘community ethnobotany’ for food forest design","authors":"Anna M. Roodhof, Melanie Ziegler, Lucie Sovová","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10980-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10980-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food forests present one of the many initiatives which seek to address the unsustainability of the industrial food system, but are often critiqued for paying insufficient attention to socio-economic inequalities. Aware of this risk, the authors and the team of regenerative citizen farm the <i>Biesterhof</i>, located in the Netherlands, engaged in participatory action research (PAR) in effort to include the neighboring community in the design of its future food forest. This paper presents the insights from this process, which built conceptually on ethnobotanical and community economies scholarships towards what we call ‘community ethnobotany’. Participant observation and interviews with the farmers, as well as members of the neighboring communities from various demographic backgrounds revealed different ways of relating to nature and particular plant species. A co-designing workshop kickstarted participants’ emotional investment in the food forest and created a sense of co-ownership between community members and the farmers. The process has provided the farmers with concrete ideas for the food forest design which includes a diverse pool of possible plant and tree species. At the same time, it elucidated physical and financial barriers experienced by some community members that hamper their access to the food forest. This article concludes with a reflection on the conceptual and practical utility of community ethnobotany as a PAR methodology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10980-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149132151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The allure and delusion of vertical plant factories in Canada and the politics of continuity","authors":"Richard S. Bloomfield, Tony Weis, Evan Bowness","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10983-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10983-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vertical plant factories (VPFs) have attracted substantial hype through bold claims about their potential benefits, even as the material, energy, and biophysical requirements of indoor cultivation cast doubt on whether those promises can be realized at scale. This paper builds on the growing critical literature on VPFs, examining the narratives of Canadian developers and their coverage in mainstream media. We begin by setting out a framework for understanding the energy- and material-intensity of VPFs, a key part of which is the need to override the biophysical constraints posed by artificial growing conditions. We then analyze the case for VPFs as set out by leading Canadian developers, organized around three central justifications: reducing environmental damage, increasing resilience, and generating economic benefits. We follow this with an examination of how the Canadian news media has covered the rise of VPFs, which has largely echoed and amplified developer optimism though with some different emphases. Our analysis shows how the prevailing imaginary of VPFs in Canada operates as a politics of continuity, whereby the unsustainability of industrial food systems is acknowledged but redirected into promises of intensifying capital investment and technological innovation. A central part of the allure of this imaginary is the appeal to consumer entitlements about the continuing year-round abundance of fresh produce, which ultimately helps defer the need for transformative shifts in how humans relate to land and food.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10983-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149133165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam Calo, Olivia Oldham-Dorrington, Philip A. Loring, M. Jahi Johnson-Chappell
{"title":"The legend of land sparing","authors":"Adam Calo, Olivia Oldham-Dorrington, Philip A. Loring, M. Jahi Johnson-Chappell","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10985-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10985-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As institutions mobilize ambitious land-use transition agendas, dominant policy narratives risk constraining their transformative potential. The land sparing–land sharing (SpSh) framework, introduced in the early 2000s, offered a compelling heuristic by positing two mutually exclusive strategies: intensifying production to “spare” land for nature, or integrating biodiversity within agricultural landscapes. While SpSh stimulated valuable empirical and theoretical work, its simplifying assumptions proved ill-suited to the complexity of land systems, leading many scholars to move beyond the debate. In this discussion, we ponder if a reductionist land sparing revival has gained traction among policy platforms, think tanks, and agribusiness actors. This rhetoric reframes sustainability as contingent on agricultural intensification, presenting yield maximization as a proxy for ecological and social progress. To understand this potential resurgence, we first trace the genealogy of SpSh, unpacking the discursive strategies that construct its legitimacy. Then, we showcase how strident contemporary land sparing rhetoric is expressed across prominent think tank publications, environmental policy positions, agribusiness communications, and academic literature. Drawing on science and technology studies, we ask if land sparing has become a “policy legend”: a socio-technical imaginary that mobilizes actors around a technocratic vision of land use, despite empirical critiques and viable alternatives. Our discussion explores how a folktale version of land sparing would narrow the parameters of food system transformation, legitimizing land concentration and reinforcing industrial paradigms under the guise of sustainability. We conclude with a warning: if indeed a simplified land sparing is resurging in its discursive power, more plural and just pathways for land governance will become foreclosed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10985-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149133128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conservation dilemmas: Xylella fastidiosa and the future(s) of olive farming","authors":"Fabio Gatti","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10970-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10970-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past decade, the bacterium <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> has profoundly transformed olive-growing landscapes in the southern Italian region of Apulia. Once characterized by ancient olive trees that sustained both rural livelihoods and cultural identities, the region is now caught between two competing trajectories: on the one hand, efforts to intensify and mechanize production to remain competitive in global olive oil markets; on the other hand, attempts to preserve centuries-old trees valued as cultural heritage and landscape elements. This paper conceptualizes this tension as a conservation dilemma: the structural conflict between sustaining olive trees simultaneously as livelihood-sustaining crops and as elements of biocultural landscapes. Drawing on long-term ethnographic research and the analysis of disease management policies and practices, the paper extends debates on conservation politics into productive agroecosystems and brings the political ecology of conservation into closer dialogue with critical agrarian studies and political agroecology. By showing that competing strategies for “saving” the olive trees enact different visions of agricultural futures, each supported—or undermined—by specific subsidy schemes, market forces, and labor regimes, the paper argues that the fate of Apulian olive trees depends less on technical solutions to the disease than on the political and economic conditions that determine which practices of care can be materially sustained. The paper concludes by reflecting on convivial conservation and a conservation basic income as potential frameworks for sustaining labor-intensive landscape-care practices beyond market-based solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10970-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149035112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Thinking beyond supermarkets: alternative pathways to food affordability","authors":"Aparna Raghu Menon, Sarah Elton","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10978-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10978-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With rising food costs and growing food insecurity, major supermarket chains are often associated with food access and affordability by policymakers and researchers. The rationale is that expanding supermarket competition will lower food prices. However, this assumption deserves empirical scrutiny. Our research on retail produce sales in Toronto, Canada, challenges the widespread assumption that supermarkets provide the most affordable food options. Drawing on three years (2022–2025) of systematic price tracking across 32 produce items in the city, we compare retail prices at independent greengrocers, mobile vendors, and major chain supermarkets. Our findings reveal that small-scale retailers offered the lowest prices 81.2% of the time, while major chains did so only 18.8% of the time. Beyond price competitiveness, small retailers serve neighbourhoods by stocking culturally appropriate foods and providing flexible payment options embedded in community relationships. A public wholesale marketplace enables this retail diversity. These findings problematize supermarket-centric food security policy and demonstrate the importance of supporting diverse retail ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149034869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Soil, solidarity, and sustainable agriculture: the grounded negotiation of environmental care in eco-farming","authors":"Markus Holdo","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10948-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10948-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroecological communities act within economic and geopolitical structures that contradict and undermine important commitments, raising the critical question: how can ethical life be sustained under such conditions? Drawing on ethnographic research in Italian agroecological farms during the Gaza war, this article argues that farming is both an object of ethical concern and the material ground for ethical reflection. Extending feminist care ethics and Beauvoir’s ethics of ambiguity, it develops the concept of an ethics of <i>grounded negotiation</i> to show how solidarity and environmental care emerge through embodied, interdependent, imperfect practices that make space for ethics within constraint rather than through purity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10948-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148981249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From fields to litigation: farmworker illness and transnational infrastructures of care in Austrian agriculture","authors":"Alesandra Tatić, Paul Sperneac-Wolfer","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10975-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10975-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While scholarship has extensively documented the prevalence of farmworker injury and illness at the point of production, less is known about what happens afterward and how harm is managed within farmworker communities. Based on multi-sited ethnographic research with Romanian worker households in Austria and Romania, we closely analyse three illness trajectories — a stroke, a lung infection, and haemorrhoids — to examine how harm is produced in agrifood work and how its consequences are handled over time. Through a social reproduction lens, we argue that these illness trajectories cannot be understood as individual medical events because they are shaped by labour regimes that externalise the costs of production onto workers’ bodies and households. Importantly, moments of illness make visible otherwise hidden transnational everyday infrastructures — networks of care, support, and obligation that sustain workers when institutions and employers withdraw. These infrastructures not only absorb the costs of injury but also provide openings to contest harm and translate it into claims for legal accountability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10975-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148986209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}