Research in the sociology of health care最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Public policies and reproductive technology: a feminist critique. 公共政策与生殖技术:女权主义批判。
T Mccormack
{"title":"Public policies and reproductive technology: a feminist critique.","authors":"T Mccormack","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":"9 ","pages":"105-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22027009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physicians' preferences for adoption, abortion, and keeping a child among adolescents. 医生对收养、堕胎和在青少年中保留孩子的偏好。
V Powell, R J Griffore, D J Kallen, S N Popovich
{"title":"Physicians' preferences for adoption, abortion, and keeping a child among adolescents.","authors":"V Powell, R J Griffore, D J Kallen, S N Popovich","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":"9 ","pages":"33-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22027012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A sour note on Roe vs. Wade. 对罗伊诉韦德案的不满。
J A Roth
{"title":"A sour note on Roe vs. Wade.","authors":"J A Roth","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":"9 ","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22027011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physician provision of abortion before Roe v. Wade. 在罗伊诉韦德案之前医生提供堕胎。
C Joffe
{"title":"Physician provision of abortion before Roe v. Wade.","authors":"C Joffe","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":"9 ","pages":"21-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22027010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Who makes the abortion decision?: law, practice, and the limits of the liberal solution. 谁来做堕胎的决定?:法律、实践和自由主义解决方案的局限性。
M A Lamanna
{"title":"Who makes the abortion decision?: law, practice, and the limits of the liberal solution.","authors":"M A Lamanna","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":"9 ","pages":"9-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22027014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public policies and reproductive technology: a feminist critique. 公共政策与生殖技术:女权主义批判。
Research in the sociology of health care Pub Date : 1988-12-01 DOI: 10.2307/3550409
T. Mccormack
{"title":"Public policies and reproductive technology: a feminist critique.","authors":"T. Mccormack","doi":"10.2307/3550409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3550409","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Reproductive technology comprises abortion, contraception, amniocentesis (more than 40 genetic disorders can be diagnosed), chorionic villus sampling, genetic screening (to reduce the risk of chromosomal defects such as Down syndrome, sickle cell anemia, Tay-Sachs disease, and cystic fibrosis), in vitro fertilization, artificial insemination by spouse or donor, the development of sperm banks, storage of frozen sperm (cryopreservation), the development of artificial wombs, techniques for predetermining the sex of a fetus, and nursery environments to maintain a fetus removed from the womb in the 1st trimester. In recent years, the demand for these services has increased because of higher infertility and the drop in the number of babies available for adoption. Surrogacy is especially controversial: it has become a symbol of the dehumanization of modern life and the exploitation of women. The feminist perspective discloses how patriarchal values about the subordinate status of women, about the nature of motherhood, infertility, and the family are both implicit and explicit in prevailing thinking about reproduction. The new technology offers women who wish to remain unmarried the opportunity to have a family, and it enables lesbian women to bear children. The research literature favors a Eurocentric nuclear family without any awareness that in Canada, and in the Western world, new forms of family life have been evolving as couples marry, divorce, and remarry. There is no awareness either that in other cultures this Eurocentric nuclear model is dysfunctional. Because of the rigid notion of the 2-parent nuclear family, the 3rd parties who are involved in either surrogate relationships or artificial insemination are deprecated. The feminist literature is more critical of the nuclear family, but it has been sometimes inconsistent on the relevant issues.\u0000","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":"9 1","pages":"105-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3550409","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68702162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信