Global implementation research and applications最新文献

{"title":"Evaluation of organizational capacity in the implementation of a church-based cancer education program.","authors":"Cheryl L Knott,&nbsp;Edward J Miech,&nbsp;Jimmie Slade,&nbsp;Nathaniel Woodard,&nbsp;Barbara-Jean Robinson-Shaneman,&nbsp;Maisha Huq","doi":"10.1007/s43477-021-00033-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-021-00033-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementation evaluations have increasingly taken into account how features of local context help determine implementation outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine which contextual features of organizational capacity led directly to the RE-AIM Framework implementation outcomes of intervention reach and number of days taken to implement, in an implementation trial of a series of cancer education workshops conducted across 13 African American churches in Maryland. We used a configurational approach with Coincidence Analysis to identify specific features of organizational capacity that uniquely distinguished churches with implementation success from those that were less successful. Aspects of organizational capacity (e.g., congregation size, staffing/volunteers, health ministry experience) were drawn from an existing measure of church organizational capacity for health promotion. Solution pathways leading to higher intervention reach included: having a health ministry in place for 1-4 years; or having fewer than 100 members; or mid-size churches that had conducted health promotion activities in 1-4 different topics in the past 2 years. Solution pathways to implementing the intervention in fewer number of days included: having conducted 1-2 health promotion activities in the past 2 years; or having 1-5 part-time staff and a pastor without additional outside employment; or churches with a doctorally prepared pastor and a weekly attendance of 101-249 members. Study findings can inform future theory, research, and practice in implementation of evidence-based health promotion interventions delivered in faith-based and other limited-resource community settings. Findings support the important role of organizational capacity in implementation outcomes in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"2 1","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8983006/pdf/nihms-1792060.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9359033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Sanitation Behavior Change Intervention in Rural Odisha, India","authors":"G. Sclar, P. Routray, F. Majorin, Shivika Udaipuria, G. Portela, William J. Koehne, C. Nagel, S. Sola, B. Caruso","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00035-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00035-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"2 1","pages":"67-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52826018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to: Evaluation of Organizational Capacity in the Implementation of a Church‑Based Cancer Education Program","authors":"C. Knott, Edward J. Miech, Jimmie L. Slade, N. Woodard, Barbara-Jean Robinson-Shaneman, M. Huq","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00034-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00034-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"2 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44339214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Measuring the Success of a Project ECHO Implementation: Results from an International e-Delphi Study.","authors":"Perrin Moss, Nicole Hartley, Dana Newcomb, Trevor Russell","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00050-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43477-022-00050-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an increasing global need for organisations to utilise high-quality telementoring models to support workforce development and mentorship. Project ECHO is a validated telementoring model that has been adopted by over 700 organisations globally across multiple sectors. To date there is no consolidated list of success indicators by which organisational teams can assess or benchmark their implementation of Project ECHO across sectors. An e-Delphi methodology was adopted to facilitate a comprehensive means of identifying indicators that could be used to assess the implementations of Project ECHO globally. This paper presents a consolidated framework of indicators that support teams to assess their implementation of Project ECHO. These indicators have been derived by an international panel of experts across the healthcare, education, and university sectors. The final framework identified 54 distinct indicators across four domains: (1) spoke participant engagement, (2) ECHO Hub/teleECHO Network design and operation, (3) ECHO Hub team engagement and (4) Local Impact. This paper highlights that Project ECHO implementation indicators can vary between being dynamic, static, and iterative, depending on the phase of implementation. These findings are significant because they are generalisable to any organisation/sector implementing Project ECHO or similar telementoring models.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-022-00050-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"2 3","pages":"179-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365209/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10589795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Identifying and Exploring Sustainability Determinants of Mental Health Recovery-Oriented Interventions: A Mixed Methods Study Protocol.","authors":"Eleni Sofouli,&nbsp;Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman,&nbsp;Danielle Groleau,&nbsp;Michel Perreault,&nbsp;Myra Piat","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00052-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00052-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental health recovery is the new paradigm in the mental health service delivery system worldwide. Recovery-oriented services go beyond traditional clinical care that is centered on symptom remission, aiming to help people: restore social connections with other individuals and the community; develop hope and optimism for the future; reconstruct an identity beyond that of a \"mental patient\"; discover meaning in life; and feel empowered to gain control over treatment (CHIME framework). Over the last ten years, several efforts at implementation of recovery-oriented interventions have been documented in the scientific literature. However, little attention has been given to their sustainability, even though it is reported that not all health interventions can fully sustain their activities beyond the initial implementation phase. The aim of this mixed methods case study is to better understand the factors that determine the sustainability of two recovery-oriented interventions (peer support and recovery training) after their roll-out in four organizations in Canada that provide community housing for adults with mental health challenges. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected from managers, service providers, and implementation team members that oversaw the implementation process along with organizational documents. Data collection and analysis will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Sustainability Constructs in Healthcare, the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications, and the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool. Findings will expand our current evidence base on the intersection of sustainability and mental health recovery interventions that remains under-explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":" ","pages":"249-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33444859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Policy and Practice Implementation During Rapid Social Change: An Introduction to the Special Section.","authors":"George Ake,&nbsp;Rosalyn Bertram,&nbsp;Jessie Watrous,&nbsp;Suzanne E U Kerns","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00066-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00066-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":" ","pages":"263-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638424/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40463790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Adaptations in the Context of COVID-19: Application of an Implementation Science FRAMEwork.","authors":"Erin C Albrecht,&nbsp;Lindsay Sherman,&nbsp;Amanda Fixsen,&nbsp;Julie Steffen","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00048-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00048-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invest in Kids (IIK) is a Denver, Colorado, USA-based intermediary organization that works to bridge the research-to-practice gap for programs that support Colorado's youngest children and their families. IIK supports evidence-based programs (EBPs) including three universal, prevention programs from The Incredible Years® (IY)-Dinosaur School (a classroom curriculum), Teacher Classroom Management (teacher professional development training), and Parent Program (parent training). IIK employs staff (the IIK-IY Team) to deliver implementation supports such as training, coaching, and managing implementation teams with professionals at schools and community agencies who deliver IY programs throughout Colorado. The COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges and opportunities for practitioners using EBPs, and for the IIK-IY Team. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded, known as the FRAME (Stirman et al., 2019), was identified as a useful tool for documenting information about COVID-19-related adaptations to local sites' delivery of the programs, IIK's implementation supports, and IIK's annual statewide evaluation of IY. This case study includes an in-depth description of the various adaptations made by the IIK-IY Team, highlighting specific examples that demonstrate how the FRAME can be used to support adaptations for numerous sites in a geographic region or state. This case study provides important lessons about what successful IY delivery and implementation supports looked like in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including a description of IY fidelity and program outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-022-00048-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":" ","pages":"278-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9243998/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40472773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"FAST: A Framework to Assess Speed of Translation of Health Innovations to Practice and Policy.","authors":"Enola Proctor, Alex T Ramsey, Lisa Saldana, Thomas M Maddox, David A Chambers, Ross C Brownson","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00045-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43477-022-00045-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 17-year time span between discovery and application of evidence in practice has become a unifying challenge for implementation science and translational science more broadly. Further, global pandemics and social crises demand timely implementation of rapidly accruing evidence to reduce morbidity and mortality. Yet speed remains an understudied metric in implementation science. Prevailing evaluations of implementation lack a temporal aspect, and current approaches have not yielded rapid implementation. In this paper, we address speed as an important conceptual and methodological gap in implementation science. We aim to untangle the complexities of studying implementation speed, offer a framework to assess speed of translation (FAST), and provide guidance to measure speed in evaluating implementation. To facilitate specification and reporting on metrics of speed, we encourage consideration of stakeholder perspectives (e.g., comparison of varying priorities), referents (e.g., speed in attaining outcomes, transitioning between implementation phases), and observation windows (e.g., time from intervention development to first patient treated) in its measurement. The FAST framework identifies factors that may influence speed of implementation and potential effects of implementation speed. We propose a research agenda to advance understanding of the pace of implementation, including identifying accelerators and inhibitors to speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"2 2","pages":"107-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161655/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9782947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Challenges in Implementing the National Health Response to COVID-19 in Senegal.","authors":"Valéry Ridde, Adama Faye","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00053-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43477-022-00053-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa, many epidemiological or anthropological studies have been published. However, few studies have yet been conducted to understand the implementation of State interventions to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. In Senegal, the national response plan was planned before the country experienced its first official case of COVID-19 on 2 March 2020. This qualitative study, conducted in March and April 2021, based on 189 interviews, aims to understand how the national response has been implemented in several regions of Senegal. Implementation of the response to the pandemic was favoured by good preparation, capacity to adapt, responsiveness of health actors, and commitment for both the political and religious authorities. The implementation response was confronted by several constraining factors such as the coercive approach, the challenges of coordinating actors, and the lack of intersectoral response. The central level has sometimes used reflexivity processes to adapt its response, but it has remained highly politicized, centralized, directive, and with little involvement of civil society. In Senegal, the response to the pandemic has been implemented in a relatively political and directive, even coercive manner, without necessarily considering prior knowledge and the need to adapt it to local contexts and to involve civil society and community actors in the process.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-022-00053-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":" ","pages":"219-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361250/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40709770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework.","authors":"Molly McNett,&nbsp;Sharon Tucker,&nbsp;Inga Zadvinskis,&nbsp;Diana Tolles,&nbsp;Bindu Thomas,&nbsp;Penelope Gorsuch,&nbsp;Lynn Gallagher-Ford","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Few studies have evaluated which factors persist among healthcare clinicians with extensive education and training on EBP implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation across a national sample of specialty-prepared EBP mentors in healthcare settings. Healthcare clinicians participating in an immersive 5-day EBP knowledge and skill building program were invited to complete a follow-up survey 12 months later to report on implementation experiences. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided content analysis of responses. A force field analysis using Lewin's change theory was used to assign numerical 'weights' to factors. Eighty-four individuals reported facilitators and barriers to implementation. The majority occurred within the inner setting of the CFIR model. Facilitators were strong leadership engagement (<i>n</i> = 15), positive EBP culture (<i>n</i> = 9), and resources (<i>n</i> = 4). Barriers included lack of resources (<i>n</i> = 21), poor leadership engagement (<i>n</i> = 19), implementation climate (<i>n</i> = 17), lack of relative priority (<i>n</i> = 12), and organizational characteristics (<i>n</i> = 9). Respondents also identified simultaneous facilitators and barriers within the process domain of the CFIR model. The construct of stakeholder engagement was a barrier when absent from the implementation process (<i>n</i> = 23), yet was a strong facilitator when present (<i>n</i> = 23). Implementation in healthcare settings appears most effective when conducted by an interprofessional team with strong leadership, resources, stakeholder engagement, and positive EBP culture. When these same factors are absent, they remain persistent barriers to implementation, even among specialty-trained healthcare clinicians.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version of this article (10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":" ","pages":"195-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373890/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40619131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}