Asiatische StudienPub Date : 2024-02-28eCollection Date: 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1515/asia-2022-0047
Hiroko Matsuoka
{"title":"What Is the <i>Tattvasaṅgraha</i> About? Kamalaśīla on the Fourteen Qualifiers of the <i>pratītyasamutpāda</i>.","authors":"Hiroko Matsuoka","doi":"10.1515/asia-2022-0047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/asia-2022-0047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Tattvasaṅgraha</i> (TS) has been considered a comprehensive encyclopedia of both Buddhist and non-Buddhist philosophical subjects. According to Kamalaśīla's <i>Vajracchedikāṭīkā</i>, however, the refutations of objections (*<i>codyaparihāra</i>) by other systems of thought is merely a means to indirectly make the reader understand the topic (*<i>abhidheya</i>) and ultimately achieve the purpose (*<i>prayojana</i>) of the work. The topic of TS is \"the true states [of things]\" (<i>tattva</i>), which is interpreted by Kamalaśīla as \"the various qualifiers of the entities that have arisen having depended on causes and conditions\" (<i>pratītyasamutpāda=pratītyasamutpanna</i>) enumerated in TS 1-6ab. It is well-known that the first ten qualifiers of the <i>pratītyasamutpāda</i> in TS 1-4ab correspond to the topics of the first twenty-three chapters of TS, while the remaining elements in TS 4cd-6abc were known to be difficult to allocate to specific chapters. This paper sheds light on the possibility of analyzing the latter elements as well, suggesting that they form the qualifiers of the <i>pratītyasamutpāda</i>. Consequently, the eleventh and twelfth qualifiers of the <i>pratītyasamutpāda,</i> \"which is free from all conceptual proliferation\" and \"which is not understood by others\" in TS 4cd, qualify the <i>pratītyasamutpāda</i> as the object of the Buddha's cognition characterized by the negation of conceptual cognition and heathen cognition. They summarize the first twenty-three chapters and all twenty-six chapters, respectively. Furthermore, the qualifications of the Buddha who teaches the <i>pratītyasamutpāda</i> in TS 5-6abc are convertible to the thirteenth and fourteen qualifications of the <i>pratītyasamutpāda</i>, \"which is taught by [the direct seer] who does not depend on an autonomous Veda\" and \"which is taught by the Omniscient One for whom the great compassion became natural.\" These paired qualities, wisdom (<i>prajñā</i>) and compassion (<i>dayā</i>), form the essential qualities of a qualified teacher of the <i>pratītyasamutpāda</i> and are described in Chs. 24-25 and Ch. 26, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":72319,"journal":{"name":"Asiatische Studien","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10899820/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139998454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"<i>Vṛddhekṣvākuvratam</i>. The commentators' interpretations of the passages describing the renunciation of kings in the <i>Raghuvaṃśa</i>.","authors":"Csaba Dezső","doi":"10.1515/asia-2021-0021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/asia-2021-0021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At the end of their life, after transferring the kingdom to their grown-up sons, several kings of the Sūryavaṃśa chose to retire from the world and devoted their last years to asceticism and meditation. The verses of the <i>Raghuvaṃśa</i> describing these kings show considerable variation mainly along the lines of which <i>āśrama</i> (stage of life) the king enters at the end of his life. In many cases the commentators discuss these variants and argue pro and contra the availability of <i>saṃnyāsa</i> for people of royal status, thus participating in a larger mediaeval debate observable in texts on <i>dharmaśāstra</i>. This paper takes into consideration former studies on the subject by Tsuchida, Olivelle and Goodall, and most importantly discusses both published and unpublished commentaries on the <i>Raghuvaṃśa</i>, examining what authorities they quote to give support to their views on this <i>dharmaśāstric</i> issue, as well as the efforts they make to present the <i>Raghuvaṃśa</i> as being both internally consistent and in harmony with the teachings on <i>dharma</i> they consider valid.</p>","PeriodicalId":72319,"journal":{"name":"Asiatische Studien","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909040/pdf/asia-76-3-asia-2021-0021.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10698528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Asiatische StudienPub Date : 2022-05-25Epub Date: 2022-09-14DOI: 10.1515/asia-2022-0009
Shuaib Ally
{"title":"Forbidding the reading of the <i>Kashshāf</i>: clarifying the Mamluk era reception of Zamakhsharī's Qur'ān commentary.","authors":"Shuaib Ally","doi":"10.1515/asia-2022-0009","DOIUrl":"10.1515/asia-2022-0009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Qur'ān commentary of Zamakhsharī (d. 538/1144), his <i>Kashshāf</i>, gained wide acclaim shortly after being written, and was widely used in research and teaching throughout the Islamic world. This favourable reception was largely due to its new rhetorical insights on how ideas are articulated in the Qur'ān through specific linguistic constructions. The work was also critiqued for its <i>Mu'tazilī</i> content, the work viewed with suspicion for championing - surreptitiously at that - the heterodox interpretations of that theological school. Appraisal and critique formed much of the basis for scholarly engagement with this work in the form of teaching and commentary writing, especially the form of supercommentary writing (<i>ḥawāshī</i>) the <i>Kashshāf</i> initiated. That Mamluk scholarly culture had an overly negative response to the <i>Kashshāf</i> for theological reasons has been vastly overstated in recent scholarship, possibly due to a tendency to view theology as a sufficient impetus driving past intellectual activity. This general portrayal derives from specific Mamluk scholars being depicted as warning against the book, forbidding its study, calling for it to be banned, and undermining or disparaging others for supporting it. This negative reception has also served to justify the transition in the Islamic world to the <i>tafsīr</i> of Bayḍāwī, a work which largely excised the Mu'tazilism of the <i>Kashshāf</i>. This article reconsiders the evidence for an overall negative Mamluk era reception of the <i>Kashshāf</i>, with specific reference to the activities of those scholars whose depiction contributes to an inaccurate portrayal of a crucial moment in <i>tafsīr</i> history, both for the activities of Mamluk era scholars themselves, as well as the subsequent shift to the use of Bayḍāwī.</p>","PeriodicalId":72319,"journal":{"name":"Asiatische Studien","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9504768/pdf/asia-76-2-asia-2022-0009.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33501294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}