Transfusion Medicine Reviews最新文献

{"title":"Actions and Attitudes of Men who Have Sex With Men Under Past, Current, and Hypothetical Future Blood Donation Deferral Policies","authors":"Christopher N. Johns ,&nbsp;Grant Simonson ,&nbsp;Benny Mart Hiwatig ,&nbsp;Michael W. Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.06.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.06.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Eligibility criteria for blood product donation are important for the safety of the blood supply, though many have called into question criteria that limit donations for men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM). Recently, in the U.S.A., the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), decreased the ‘deferral’ period, the period in which one must abstain from sex, for MSM, from twelve months to three. This study examined the proportion of MSM respondents that donated blood under past and current deferral policies, as well as the proportion that would consider donating under hypothetical shorter deferral policies. To achieve this, an electronic survey was disseminated on social media platforms via virtual flier calling for participation from a self-selected convenience sample of the MSM community. Compared to either the 12-month or 3-month deferral policies, intent to donate blood was significantly higher in both alternative two week or no deferral policy scenarios. The majority of respondents who did donate did so without following deferral guidelines under both the 12-month and 3-month policies. There was no significant change in the proportion of those who donated against guidelines between the twelve- and three-month deferrals. While social media is an effective tool for survey work it poses significant risk for selection bias. Further studies with diverse sampling are necessary to better elucidate blood production donation trends within the MSM community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 3","pages":"Pages 152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40671282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison Between Standard and High Dose of G-CSF for Mobilization of Hematopoietic Progenitors Cells in Patients and Healthy Donors","authors":"Irene García-García ,&nbsp;Joan Cid ,&nbsp;Gloria Carbassé ,&nbsp;Javier López-Jiménez ,&nbsp;Gemma Moreno ,&nbsp;Miquel Lozano","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.06.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.06.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A standard dose of 10 µg/kg/day granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) is currently recommended for hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) mobilization. Our aim was to analyze whether certain patients or healthy donors could benefit from high dose of G-CSF.We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of HPCs mobilization procedures (2015-2020) in patients and healthy donors. Those who received standard dose of G-CSF (10 µg/Kg/day for 4 days to patients and healthy donors) and those that received higher dose (24 µg/Kg/day for 4 days to patients and 16 µg/Kg/day for 4 days to healthy donors) were compared.496 individuals were included (201 standard dose and 295 higher dose). Between standard or higher dose, we did not find significant differences in median number of mobilized CD34+ cells/mL, neither among healthy donors (77 100 vs 75 500 respectively, <em>P</em> = .895), nor in patients (34 270 vs 33 704 respectively, <em>P</em> = .584). Additionally, among those with the same underlaying pathology the comparison between standard and higher dose did not showed differences. High G-CSF dose was not associated with a less frequent incidence of poor mobilizers (&lt;20 000 CD34+ cells/mL) neither in healthy donors (1 [1.3%] vs 0; <em>P</em> = .218) nor patients (30 [24.4%] vs 32 [18.1%]; <em>P</em> = .165). Multivariate analysis showed that age, gender, and G-CSF dose did not influence median number of mobilized CD34+ cells/mL in healthy donors or patients. However, the underlying pathology among patients significantly influenced the CD34+ cells mobilization. In healthy donors, cellular blood count showed significantly higher leukocytes and platelets count with G-CSF high-dose, while in patients just a higher platelets count was found. To conclude, high dose of G-CSF compared to standard dose did not show significant benefit in terms of mobilization of CD34+ cells in healthy donors or in patients, also without a decrease in the incidence of poor mobilizers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 3","pages":"Pages 159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40597568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hyperkalaemia Following Blood Transfusion–a Systematic Review Assessing Evidence and Risks","authors":"Julia Wolf ,&nbsp;Louise J. Geneen ,&nbsp;Athina Meli ,&nbsp;Carolyn Doree ,&nbsp;Rebecca Cardigan ,&nbsp;Helen V. New","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hyperkalaemia following transfusion is widely reported in the literature. Our objective was to critically review recent evidence on hyperkalaemia in association with transfusion and to assess whether specific aspects of transfusion practice can affect the likelihood of developing hyperkalaemia. We searched 9 electronic databases (including MEDLINE, Embase, and Transfusion Evidence Library) using a predefined search strategy, from 2010 to April 8, 2021. Three reviewers performed dual screening, extraction, and risk of bias assessment. We used Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) 2 for assessment of RCTs, ROBINS-I for non-RCTs, and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. We report 7 comparisons of interest in <em>n</em> = 3729 patients from 28 studies (11 RCTs, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 13 retrospective cohort studies): (1) age of blood, (2) washing, (3) filtration, (4) irradiation, (5) fluid type, (6) transfusion vs no transfusion, (7) blood volume/rate. Of the 28 studies included, 25 reported outcomes of potassium (K+) concentration, 17 the number developing hyperkalaemia, 13 mortality, 10 cardiac arrest, and 10 cardiac arrhythmia. Only 16 studies provided analysable data suitable for quantitative analysis. Evidence addressing our outcomes was of very low certainty (downgraded for incomplete outcome data, baseline imbalance, imprecision around the estimate, and small sample size). While 5 studies showed a difference in K+ concentration up to 6 hours posttransfusion for 3 comparisons (age of blood, washing, and transfusion volume/rate), and 3 studies showed a difference in the diagnosis of hyperkalaemia for 2 comparisons (age of blood, and transfusion volume/rate), the evidence was inconsistent across all included studies. There was no difference in any reported outcomes for 4 comparisons (filtration, irradiation, fluid type, or transfusion vs no transfusion). Overall, the reported evidence was too weak to support identification of groups most at risk of hyperkalaemia or to support recommendations on use of short-storage RBC. For other commonly used risk mitigations for hyperkalaemia in transfusion medicine, the (low certainty) evidence was either conflicting or not supportive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 3","pages":"Pages 133-142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45809396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cardiovascular Benefits for Blood Donors? A Systematic Review","authors":"Franke A. Quee ,&nbsp;Karlijn Peffer ,&nbsp;Anique D. Ter Braake,&nbsp;Katja Van den Hurk","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It has been proposed that blood donation could be protective against cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study is to systematically summarize and evaluate existing observational and experimental studies on effects of blood donation on cardiovascular risk and disease in donor and general populations. The electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched until March 2019 for experimental and observational studies on blood donation and cardiovascular risk or disease. Excluded were studies performed in patient populations or with controls compared to a patient population, and studies performed in individuals aged &lt;18 or &gt;70. All identified studies were independently screened for eligibility and quality using validated scoring systems by 2 reviewers. A total of 44 studies met all criteria. We included 41 observational studies and 3 experimental studies. 14 studies had a quality assessment score of 7 or higher. Of those, a majority of 9 studies reported a protective effect of blood donation, while 5 studies found no effects on cardiovascular risk factors. Results on other various outcomes were inconsistent and study quality was generally poor. Whether or not blood donation protects against cardiovascular disease remains unclear. Studies showing beneficial effects may have inadequately dealt with the healthy donor effect. High quality studies are lacking and therefore definite conclusions cannot be drawn. Large RCTs or cohort studies of high quality with sufficient follow-up should be conducted to provide evidence on the possible association between blood donation and cardiovascular disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 3","pages":"Pages 143-151"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43283208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Gender Inequities in Transfusion Medicine Society Recognition Awards","authors":"Jeremy W. Jacobs ,&nbsp;Brian D. Adkins ,&nbsp;Laura D. Stephens ,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Woo ,&nbsp;Garrett S. Booth","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Award recognition by medical societies contributes to professional development, career networking, and academic rank promotion. Previous research has demonstrated that men are the predominant recipients of medical society awards across multiple medical specialties; as such, we sought to understand whether women are underrepresented as award recipients amongst blood banking and transfusion medicine (BBTM) medical societies. We examined recipients of 10 total awards from the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB) and the American Society for Apheresis. Additional evaluation of AABB's National Blood Foundation Hall of Fame inductees was conducted. Gender was determined via online review of pronouns, online photographs, and a web-based gender identification application. Award recipient gender was analyzed and coded independently by two authors, and any discrepancies were adjudicated by author consensus. Of the 330 AABB awards since 1954, significantly more have been conferred to men (81.5%, 269/330; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Of the 51 American Society for Apheresis awards presented since 1993, 64.7% (33/51; <em>P =</em> .23) have been conferred to men. Compared to the first 10 years of the AABB awards (1954-1964), there has been a significant increase in the proportion of women award recipients in the most recent decade (2010-2021) (18.5%, 5/27 vs 29.4%, 30/102; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). However, additional temporal analysis of the modern era (2000-2021) revealed men have received significantly more AABB awards than women (77.4%, 144/186 vs 22.6%, 42/186; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Our findings highlight both historic and contemporary inequity for recognition of women within BBTM. Without improvement, gender parity among BBTM award recipients will take approximately 120 years (11% increase in women awardees in 60 years); thus, to ensure the BBTM field continues to progress, we must advocate for equity among all members, including but not limited to gender, race, and ethnicity. Strategies to enhance equity include transparency in the identities of award nominees, award recipients, and individuals on selection committees, the gender ratios of both award nominees and recipients, and implementation of methods for tracking individual demographics over time. These strategies would permit temporal analysis of the ratio of award nominee gender to award recipient gender, and assessment as to whether potential gender inequities improve over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 82-86"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47403811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Next Generation Sequencing of Human Platelet Antigens for Routine Clinical Investigations and Donor Screening","authors":"J Guglielmino,&nbsp;DE Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping is performed in a number of clinical scenarios, including characterization of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia and provision of HPA-matched platelets. Current gold-standard methods for HPA genotyping utilize single nucleotide variant (SNV) based approaches. This review aims to ascertain if next generation sequencing (NGS) has reasonable grounds to replace SNV-based genotyping for HPA systems. A systematic review was conducted following a comprehensive literature search in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were subjected to screening based on a defined set of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Study quality, characteristics and results were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the concordance of HPA genotyping results between NGS and the SNV-based comparators for HPA-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-15. In total, 3374 potentially eligible articles were identified, only 6 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion agreement for the overall concordance of the 6 included studies was shown to be 0.998, 95%CI [0.995, 0.999], <em>P</em> &lt; .001. The discrepancies between HPA genotypes obtained by the two platforms were due to allele dropout in real-time PCR, thus discordant results were in favor of NGS over SNV-based comparators. Currently available platforms for NGS are not without their limitations, including high upfront and ongoing costs, data management and storage, accurate variant calling and availability of appropriately trained staff. Despite the high level of concordance between NGS and current gold-standard methods, these significant challenges mean that NGS is currently not viable as a stand-alone technique for HPA typing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39900685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iron Therapy for Treating Anaemia in Critically ill Adults: A Rapid Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis","authors":"Louise J Geneen ,&nbsp;Catherine Kimber ,&nbsp;Carolyn Doree ,&nbsp;Simon Stanworth ,&nbsp;Akshay Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our objective was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron therapy for treating anaemia in critically ill adults (&gt;16 years) admitted to intensive care or high dependency units. We excluded quasi-RCTs and other not truly randomised trials. We searched 7 electronic databases (including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase) using a pre-defined search strategy from inception to June 14, 2021. One reviewer screened, extracted, and analysed data, with verification by a second reviewer of all decisions. We used Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) 1 and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. We reported 3 comparisons across 1198 patients, in 8 RCTs:</p><p>(1) IV iron vs control (7 RCTs, 748 participants); our primary outcome (hemoglobin (Hb) concentration at 10 to 30 days) was reported in 7 of the 8 included trials. There was evidence of an effect (very-low certainty) in favour of IV iron over control in the main comparison only (6 RCTs, n = 528, mean difference (MD) 0.52g/dL [95%CI 0.23, 0.81], <em>P</em> = .0005).</p><p>For the remaining outcomes there was no evidence of an effect in either direction (low certainty of evidence for Hb concentration at &lt;10 days; very-low certainty of evidence for hospital duration, ICU duration, hospital readmission, infection, mortality; HRQoL outcomes were not GRADED).</p><p>(2) IV iron + subcutaneous erythropoietin (EPO) vs control (2 RCTs, 104 participants); reported outcomes showed no evidence of effect in either direction, based on very-low certainty evidence (Hb concentration at 10-30 days, and &lt;10 days, infection, mortality).</p><p>(3) Hepcidin-guided treatment with IV iron or iron+ EPO vs standard care (1 RCT, 399 participants) reported evidence of an effect in favour of the intervention for 90-day mortality (low certainty of evidence), but no other group differences for the reported outcomes (low certainty evidence for Hb concentration at 10-30 days, hospital duration; HRQoL was not GRADED).</p><p>The evidence across all comparisons was downgraded for high and unclear ROB for lack of blinding, incomplete outcome data, baseline imbalance, and imprecision around the estimate (wide CIs and small sample size). In conclusion, the current evidence continues to support further investigation into the role for iron therapy in increasing Hb in critically ill patients. Recent, small, trials have begun to focus on patient-centred outcomes but a large, well conducted, and adequately powered trial is needed to inform clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39821853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hypersensitivity transfusion reactions to fresh frozen plasma: a retrospective analysis of the French hemovigilance network","authors":"Charles Tacquard ,&nbsp;Georges Andreu ,&nbsp;Nicolas Meyer ,&nbsp;Monique Carlier ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Py ,&nbsp;Christian Drouet ,&nbsp;Jacques Bienvenu ,&nbsp;Paul Michel Mertes ,&nbsp;Karim Boudjedir","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Few data are currently available on hypersensitivity transfusion reactions (HTRs) after exposure to fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Between 2000 and 2018, three different FFP production strategies have been used in France, leading to the concomitant use of different types of FFP. The objective of this study was to describe the rate of FFP-related HTRs and to assess the relative risk of each type of FFP. HTR following FFP transfusion between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively extracted from the national hemovigilance database of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). Temporal evolution of the incidence of reactions was modeled using logistic regression. During the study period, the overall rate of FFP-related HTRs was 52.0 (95% CI 50.2-53.9) reactions per 100,000 units of FFP issued. The rate of FFP-related HTRs progressively increased over the study period, from 28.7 (95% CI 22.8-36.0) in 2000 to 88.9 (78.8-100.3) reactions per 100,000 units of FFP issued in 2018 (OR 1.08 [1.07 - 1.09], <em>P</em> &lt; .001), whereas the rate of other types of adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) decreased. Between 2000 and 2014, its period of use, Solvent-Detergent-treated Apheresis FFP (SD-APH) was associated with the lowest risk of HTR. Our results indicate that although the rate of HTRs to FFP is low in France, the risk of having such a reaction has steadily increased between 2000 and 2018. A declarative bias is unlikely as the rate of other type of FFP-related ATRs decreased over the same period. The risk of HTRs to FFP is suggested to differ according to the processing of the FFP with a lower risk for SD-APH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45629108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Journal Club","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.03.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 107-113"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137056168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ontario's Massive Hemorrhage Toolkit","authors":"Stephanie Cope,&nbsp;Jeannie Callum,&nbsp;Katerina Pavenski,&nbsp;Troy Thompson,&nbsp;Allison Collins,&nbsp;Andrew Petrosoniak,&nbsp;Mark McVey,&nbsp;Suzanne Beno,&nbsp;Kimmo Murto,&nbsp;Andrew McDonald,&nbsp;Menaka Pai,&nbsp;Jacob Pendergrast,&nbsp;Lani Lieberman,&nbsp;Avery Nathens","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.10.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 1","pages":"Page 67"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44571661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}