Ethics & Global Politics最新文献_第9页

Amartya Sen’s nonideal theory Amartya Sen的非理想理论

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-06-25 DOI: 10.1080/16544951.2019.1622398

Kristina Meshelski

引用次数: 3

BRICS, soft power and climate change: new challenges in global governance? 金砖国家、软实力和气候变化:全球治理的新挑战?

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI: 10.1080/16544951.2019.1611339

Francesco Petrone

引用次数: 18

Can the right to internal movement, residence, and employment ground a right to immigrate? 国内迁徙、居住和就业的权利可以作为移民权利的基础吗?

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-02-04 DOI: 10.1080/16544951.2019.1571359

M. James

{"title":"Can the right to internal movement, residence, and employment ground a right to immigrate?","authors":"M. James","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2019.1571359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1571359","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article challenges Kieran Oberman’s derivation of a right to immigrate from the right to internal movement, residence, and employment. His argument depends on a cantilever strategy, which finds it illogical to recognize one right without recognizing an analogous second right. This differs from a direct argument, which derives a right directly from an essential human interest, and an instrumental argument, which identifies one right as a means to protecting another right. The strength of a cantilever argument depends on the direct or instrumental foundations of the initial right and the aptness of the analogy between it and the new right that one seeks to establish. Oberman’s argument fails on both accounts. First, his defense of the initial right to internal movement, residence, and employment, although portrayed as a direct argument, actually rests on inapt cantilever analogies with other rights, such as freedom of speech or religion. Second, the overall cantilever argument for deriving the right to immigrate fails, because immigration across fiscally separate states is not analogous to movement, residence, and employment within a single, fiscally unified state. Instead, a right to travel and visit is the proper outcome of Oberman’s argument.","PeriodicalId":55964,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & Global Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2019-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90146466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

How does finance affect the politics of everyday life? 金融如何影响日常生活中的政治?

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-18 DOI: 10.4324/9781315099118-18

M. Davies

引用次数: 0

Who has rights? 谁拥有权利?

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-18 DOI: 10.4324/9781315099118-25

G. Shani

引用次数: 1

What makes the world dangerous? 是什么让世界变得危险?

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-18 DOI: 10.4324/9781315099118-23

Thomas B. Gregory

引用次数: 0

On the enforceability of poverty-related responsibilities 论贫困相关责任的可执行性

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16544951.2019.1565607

S. Burri, Lars Christie

{"title":"On the enforceability of poverty-related responsibilities","authors":"S. Burri, Lars Christie","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2019.1565607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1565607","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We argue that even if an agent’s initial responsibilities are not very demanding, it can become permissible to burden her with significant costs if she culpably fails to discharge those responsibilities. In particular, we defend the claim that even if our responsibilities to assist others are not initially very demanding, our failure to live up to them can make us liable to possibly burdensome enforcement costs. Christian Barry and Gerhard Øverland (2016) disagree. They claim that other things equal, fewer costs may be imposed on an agent if she culpably fails to live up to her assistance-based responsibilities as opposed to her responsibilities not to contribute towards harm. Their thought is that our responsibilities to assist others are less demanding than our responsibilities not to contribute towards harm, and they assume that this asymmetry is matched by an asymmetry in the enforceability of the two types of responsibility. We agree with Barry and Øverland (2016) that our assistance-based responsibilities are less demanding than our contribution-based responsibilities. We argue that autonomy-based reasons support this asymmetry. Pace Barry and Øverland (2016), we claim that there is no reason to think that the two types of responsibility differ in their enforceability.","PeriodicalId":55964,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & Global Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83996957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Précis of Responding to Global Poverty: Harm, Responsibility, and Agency 应对全球贫困的实践:危害、责任和机构

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16544951.2019.1565603

Christian Barry

引用次数: 0

Barry and Øverland on doing, allowing, and enabling harm Barry和Øverland关于造成，允许和促成伤害的问题

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16544951.2019.1568790

Fiona Woollard

{"title":"Barry and Øverland on doing, allowing, and enabling harm","authors":"Fiona Woollard","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2019.1568790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1568790","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Responding to Global Poverty: Harm, Responsibility, and Agency, Christian Barry and Gerhard Øverland address the two types of argument that have dominated discussion of the responsibilities of the affluent to respond to global poverty. The second type of argument appeals to ‘contribution-based responsibilities’: the affluent have a duty to do something about the plight of the global poor because they have contributed to that plight. Barry and Øverland rightly recognize that to assess contribution-based responsibility for global poverty, we need to understand what it is for an agent to contribute to harm rather than merely failing to prevent it. Barry and Øverland argue that we should replace the traditional bipartite distinction doing and allowing with a bipartite distinction between doing, allowing and enabling. I argue that their discussion represents a significant contribution to this debate. However, more detail on their key ideas of ‘relevant action’ and ‘complete causal process’ is needed. Moreover, in cases involving the removal of barriers, the non-need based claims of those involved matter. Abbreviations: DAD: doing/allowing distinction; DAED: doing/allowing/enabling distinction","PeriodicalId":55964,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & Global Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89555598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Harm, responsibility, and enforceability 危害、责任和可执行性

IF 0.7 3区哲学

Ethics & Global Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16544951.2019.1565602

Christian Barry

引用次数: 1