发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Studia Neoaristotelica最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A Probabilistic Argument for the Reality of Free Personal Agency 关于自由个人代理现实的概率论证
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2017-08-11 DOI: 10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171412
L'ubos Rojka
{"title":"A Probabilistic Argument for the Reality of Free Personal Agency","authors":"L'ubos Rojka","doi":"10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171412","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"14 1","pages":"39-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49173459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How (Not) to Be an Aristotelian With Respect to Contemporary Physics 如何（不）成为当代物理学的亚里士多德主义者
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2017-08-11 DOI: 10.5840/studneoar20171414
L. Novak
{"title":"How (Not) to Be an Aristotelian With Respect to Contemporary Physics","authors":"L. Novak","doi":"10.5840/studneoar20171414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20171414","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"14 1","pages":"85-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46276037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Ontological Status of the Body in Aquinas’s Hylomorphism 论阿奎那身体的本体地位
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2017-08-11 DOI: 10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171411
Tianyue Wu
{"title":"The Ontological Status of the Body in Aquinas’s Hylomorphism","authors":"Tianyue Wu","doi":"10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171411","url":null,"abstract":"The Ontological Status of the Body in Aquinas’s Hylomorphism Hylomorphism is central to Thomistic philosophical anthropology. However, little atten­ tion has been paid to the ontological status of the body in this theoretical framework. This essay aims to show that in Aquinas’s hylomorphic ontology, the body as a constituent part of the compound is above all prime matter as pure potentiality. In view of the contemporary criticisms of prime matter, it examines the fundamental theoretical presuppositions of this controversial concept and offers a defensive reading of Aquinas’s conception of the body as prime matter. It also displays possible difficulties in identifying the body with prime matter and gives a clue indicating the way out. This effort will make it possible to defend the consistency of Aquinas’s conception of the body and to react to the severe criticism of hylomorphism in the philosophy of mind by contemporary philosophers such as Bernard Williams, namely by showing how hylomorphism can be formally consistent without slip­ ping into the materialism or dualism it bitterly opposes.","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"14 1","pages":"5-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46115289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hodnotová slepota podle von Hildebranda 冯·希尔德布兰德的价值盲目性
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/studneoar201714513
Martin Cajthaml
{"title":"Hodnotová slepota podle von Hildebranda","authors":"Martin Cajthaml","doi":"10.5840/studneoar201714513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar201714513","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"14 1","pages":"37-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5840/studneoar201714513","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71297633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Butchvarov on the Dehumanization of Philosophy 布切瓦洛夫论哲学的非人性化
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2016-12-12 DOI: 10.5840/studneoar20161327
W. Vallicella
{"title":"Butchvarov on the Dehumanization of Philosophy","authors":"W. Vallicella","doi":"10.5840/studneoar20161327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20161327","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"13 1","pages":"181-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71298084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can Aristotelianism Make Sense of Perihelion–Aphelion Orbits? 亚里士多德学说能解释近日点和远日点的轨道吗?
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2016-12-12 DOI: 10.5840/studneoar20161325
L. Groarke
{"title":"Can Aristotelianism Make Sense of Perihelion–Aphelion Orbits?","authors":"L. Groarke","doi":"10.5840/studneoar20161325","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20161325","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"13 1","pages":"121-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71298065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Elliptical Orbits and the Aristotelian Scientific Revolution Comment on Groarke 椭圆轨道与亚里士多德的科学革命
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2016-12-12 DOI: 10.5840/STUDNEOAR20161326
James Franklin
{"title":"Elliptical Orbits and the Aristotelian Scientific Revolution Comment on Groarke","authors":"James Franklin","doi":"10.5840/STUDNEOAR20161326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/STUDNEOAR20161326","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"13 1","pages":"169-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71298075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Doctrina de connotatis v barokně-scholastické diskusi 巴洛克学术讨论中的内涵论
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2016-11-01 DOI: 10.5840/studneoar201613611
L. Novák
{"title":"Doctrina de connotatis v barokně-scholastické diskusi","authors":"L. Novák","doi":"10.5840/studneoar201613611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar201613611","url":null,"abstract":"On the Doctrina de Connotatis as Discussed in Baroque Scholasticism In Baroque scholasticism the medieval semantic theory of connotation as a property of terms, originally elaborated by Ockham and others, received an ontological application or re-interpretation in the context of the theory of relations. The main proponent of this ontologized “doctrina de connotatis” seems to have been Suárez. Subsequently, this doctrine was severely criticised by the Jesuits Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza and Rodrigo de Arriaga, but also by the “princeps Scotistarum” Bartholomeo Mastri; whereas another Scotist, John Punch, adopted a theory of relations close to this doctrine. The fates of the original semantic theory of connotation, the ontologized “doctrina de connotatis” and the broader context of the relevant discussions (especially the new res–modus ontology established around 1600) document the complexity of the history of scholastic ideas, irreducible to any simple paradigm (like that of the realism–nominalism strife).","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"13 1","pages":"105-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5840/studneoar201613611","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71298006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scholastický příspěvek k ideálu jednoty lidstva a jejímu politickému vyjádření v 16. a 17. století v kontextu předchozího a následného vývoje 学术界对人类统一理想的贡献及其在16年的政治表达。和17。在先前和随后的发展背景下的世纪
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI: 10.5840/STUDNEOAR201613510
Roman Míčka
{"title":"Scholastický příspěvek k ideálu jednoty lidstva a jejímu politickému vyjádření v 16. a 17. století v kontextu předchozího a následného vývoje","authors":"Roman Míčka","doi":"10.5840/STUDNEOAR201613510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/STUDNEOAR201613510","url":null,"abstract":"The Scholastic Contribution to the Idea of the Unity of Mankind and its Political Expression in the 16th and 17th Centuries in the Context of Previous and Subsequent Developments This paper is concerned with the idea of unity of mankind and the possibilities of its political expression, particularly with respect to the contribution of the Spanish scholastics Francisco de Vitoria and Francisco Suárez, who gave a crucial impetus to the development of the concept of ius gentium. Then it discusses how the issue was developed in the work of Hugo Grotius and how political expression of the unity of mankind was refl ected on in modern scholasticism — in the work of Luigi Taparelli and Jacques Maritain. In the conclusion it briefl y evaluates the diff erences and the potential impact on the social doctrine of the Church and contemporary political thinking in the context of Christian social thought, particularly with regard to the concept of a ‘global political authority’.","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"13 1","pages":"69-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5840/STUDNEOAR201613510","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71297966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cajetan of Thiene on the Logic of Paradox 论悖论的逻辑
IF 0.1
Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2016-08-03 DOI: 10.5840/STUDNEOAR20161313
Miroslav Hanke
{"title":"Cajetan of Thiene on the Logic of Paradox","authors":"Miroslav Hanke","doi":"10.5840/STUDNEOAR20161313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/STUDNEOAR20161313","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"13 1","pages":"71-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2016-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71297890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信