Rehabilitation最新文献

{"title":"Leben mit Corona in besonderen Wohnformen","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/a-2041-4422","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2041-4422","url":null,"abstract":"Ende 2022 hat die Technische Universität München den Abschlussbericht\u0000 zu einer Feldstudie veröffentlicht, in der sie untersuchte, wie in\u0000 besonderen Wohnformen der Eingliederungshilfe während der COVID-19-Pandemie\u0000 Aufgaben der Gesundheitssorge mit dem Anspruch auf gesellschaftliche Teilhabe\u0000 vereinbart wurden. Deutschlandweit nahmen 20 Einrichtungen der Eingliederungshilfe\u0000 an den Befragungen teil. Es wurden die Einschätzungen der Bewohnerinnen und\u0000 Bewohner, der Einrichtungsleitungen, des Fachpersonals und der Angehörigen\u0000 erfasst.","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44945458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Forschungs- und Innovationspreis der GfR","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/a-2041-6840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2041-6840","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47905751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Gesetz zur Förderung eines inklusiven\u0000 Arbeits-marktes","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/a-2041-3999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2041-3999","url":null,"abstract":"Ende November 2022 legte die Bundesregierung in Umsetzung des Koalitionsvertrags den\u0000 Referentenentwurf für ein „Gesetz zur Förderung eines\u0000 inklusiven Arbeitsmarktes“ vor. Das Bundesministerium für Arbeit und\u0000 Soziales (BMAS) erklärte dazu, mit dem Gesetz sei beabsichtigt, mehr\u0000 Menschen mit Behinderungen und gesundheitlichen Beeinträchtigungen in\u0000 reguläre Arbeit zu bringen, zu halten und Menschen mit Schwerbehinderung\u0000 zielgerichteter zu unterstützen. Unter anderem ist bei der Ausgleichsabgabe\u0000 eine vierte Staffel für Arbeitgeber, die trotz Beschäftigungspflicht\u0000 keinen einzigen schwerbehinderten Menschen beschäftigen, vorgesehen;\u0000 zugleich aber soll die bisherige Bußgeldvorschrift dazu aufgehoben werden.\u0000 Mittel aus der Ausgleichsabgabe sollen nur noch der Beschäftigung auf dem\u0000 allgemeinen Arbeitsmarkt dienen. Beim Budget für Arbeit soll die Deckelung\u0000 des Lohnkostenzuschusses aufgehoben werden.","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49226757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"S2k-Leitlinie SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 und (Früh-) Rehabilitation – eine Kurzfassung mit allen Empfehlungen im Überblick.","authors":"Thomas Platz,&nbsp;Stefan Berghem,&nbsp;Peter Berlit,&nbsp;Stefan Dewey,&nbsp;Christian Dohle,&nbsp;Helmut Fickenscher,&nbsp;Eva Grill,&nbsp;Manju Guha,&nbsp;Volker Köllner,&nbsp;Axel Kramer,&nbsp;Annett Reißhauer,&nbsp;Axel Schlitt,&nbsp;Konrad Schultz,&nbsp;Monika Steimann,&nbsp;Hajo Zeeb","doi":"10.1055/a-1844-9984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1844-9984","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The consensus-based SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and Rehabilitation Practice Guideline provides recommendations that take both infection prevention and the pursuit of therapeutic goals in rehabilitation settings during the coronavirus pandemic into account. The Practice Guideline provides guidance how to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections in rehabilitation settings in a first part. The guideline's second part addresses rehabilitation for patients affected by COVID-19 starting with interventions on intensive care units, during early rehabilitation, post-acute rehabilitation, in outpatient and community rehabilitation settings, as well as long-term care, e. g. for COVID-19 survivors with Long- or Post-COVID.The updated second version of the Practice Guideline (dating from 01.11.2021) is a consensus-based guideline developed by a representative panel of healthcare professionals from 15 medical societies covering various rehabilitation disciplines, infectious diseases, hospital hygiene, and epidemiology. The abbreviated version provides an overview of all recommendations given.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":"62 2","pages":"76-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9640060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Was bedeutet der WHO-Aufruf „Rehabilitation 2030: A call for action“ im Kontext des deutschen Gesundheitssystems? – Ein Diskussionsbeitrag.","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/a-2047-7933","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2047-7933","url":null,"abstract":"Die Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) hat in der zurückliegenden Dekade die Rehabilitation deutlich stärker in den Fokus genommen als dies vorher der Fall war. Obwohl die Rehabilitation seit Jahrzehnten als essenzieller Bestandteil der sogenannten „Universal Health Coverage“ genannt wurde [1], war sie lange Zeit auf der gesundheitspolitischen Agenda nicht prioritär vertreten [2]. Stärker in den Fokus gelangt ist die Rehabilitation u. a. nach der Resolution 58.23 der Weltgesundheitsversammlung mit dem Titel „Disability, including prevention, management and rehabilitation“ aus dem Jahr 2005, in dem unter vielen anderen Punkten die Erstellung eines Weltberichts über Behinderung und Rehabilitation gefordert wurde [3]. Ein solcher, auf wissenschaftlichen Daten beruhender Bericht wurde im Jahr 2011 vorgelegt. Er enthält umfangreiche Analysen und Empfehlungen zur rehabilitativen Versorgung weltweit [4]. In diesem Bericht wird die Rehabilitation als Maßnahmenbündel definiert, das zur Verbesserung der Funktionsfähigkeit von Menschen mit Behinderungen führt1. Aufgrund einer weiteren Resolution (Resolution WHA 66.9 mit dem Titel „Disability“ im Jahr 2013) wurde 2014 ein Aktionsplan vorgelegt („Global Disability Action Plan 2014–2021– Better Health for all People with Disabilities;[5], in dem u. a. die Stärkung und Ausweitung der Rehabilitation gefordert wird2.","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":"62 2","pages":"70-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9378961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unterstützung von Menschen mit psychischen Erkrankungen im\u0000 SGB II","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/a-2041-4125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2041-4125","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43916691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on the Utilization of Cancer Rehabilitation: a Difference-in-Differences Analysis].","authors":"David Fauser,&nbsp;Hannes Banaschak,&nbsp;Pia Zollmann,&nbsp;Marco Streibelt,&nbsp;Matthias Bethge","doi":"10.1055/a-1936-4083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1936-4083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Restricted access to rehabilitative care due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic may affect the participation of cancer survivors and risks progression of the underlying disease. The aim of our analyses was to examined the extent to which cancer rehabilitations in Germany decreased due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrieved from the German Pension Insurance which is the main provider for medical rehabilitation in Germany. We used monthly cross-sectional data on the utilization of cancer rehabilitation (Ca-rehab-services according to section 15 for working-aged people or section 31 social security code VI for pensioners) in 2019 and 2020. We used a difference-in-differences model to determine the reduction in rehabilitation utilization attributable to the pandemic and reported incidence rate ratios (IRR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 146,924 cancer rehabilitations in 2019 and 113,117 cancer rehabilitations in 2020. Compared to the previous year, the nationwide decline in cancer rehabilitations was greatest in April 2020 (63.2%). Utilization of cancer rehabilitation was reduced by 11.5% for benefits according to section 15 social security code VI (IRR=0.885; 95% CI: 0.864 to 0.906) and by 26.5% for benefits according to section 31 (IRR=0.735; 95% CI: 0.717 to 0.754) due to the pandemic. For pensioners the decline in utilization was more pronounced in Western Germany than in Eastern Germany and greater for non-post-acute rehabilitations than for post-acute rehabilitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analyses show a pandemic-related decline in cancer rehabilitations, especially in cancer rehabilitation services for pensioners. Failure to seek medical rehabilitation, through which physical and psychological recovery and relief from disease and treatment side effects can be achieved, will have a lasting impact on the participation for many cancer survivors. Repeated monitoring of work ability and health of chronically ill people could generate necessary data to clarify why people in need of rehabilitation have avoided seeking medical rehabilitation and how they can be supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":"62 2","pages":"104-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9291752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Systematic Reviews on the Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation].","authors":"Annett Salzwedel,&nbsp;Bernhard Rauch","doi":"10.1055/a-1746-4895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1746-4895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials are considered to represent the highest level of scientific evidence in clinical medicine provided internationally accepted guidelines and checklists are followed.In systematic reviews and meta-analyses all clinical studies focussing a specific predefined clinical question are collected and evaluated. The results of systematic reviews strongly depend on the study protocol, including the exact definition of the population of interest, the therapeutic intervention under consideration and, last not least, the time period of observation. Moreover, evaluating multidisciplinary rehabilitation, its specifications with regard to therapeutic content, intensity and duration, supervision and general framework must be considered for correctly estimating determinants that control therapeutic success or failure.The range of potential risks of bias arising during planning, realization and publication of clinical studies is considerable and needs to be carefully estimated with regard to each single study included in meta-analysis.Taking together, the incremental scientific value of systematic reviews and meta-analyses cannot be taken for granted, but strongly depends on the methodological quality of the clinical studies being included as well as on the systematic process of the meta-analysis and the critical interpretation of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":"62 2","pages":"113-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9294952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Vierter Teilhabeverfahrensbericht der BAR","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/a-2041-3967","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2041-3967","url":null,"abstract":"Die Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation (BAR) hat Ende 2022 den\u0000 vierten Teilhabeverfahrensbericht (THVB) veröffentlicht. Dem Bericht ist\u0000 u. a. zu entnehmen, dass auch im Jahr 2021 fast 2,8 Mio. Anträge auf\u0000 Rehabilitationsleistungen gestellt wurden; im Vergleich zum Vorjahr bleibt das\u0000 Antragsvolumen somit auf konstantem Niveau. 83% der entschiedenen\u0000 Anträge wurden vollständig oder teilweise bewilligt. Bis zur\u0000 Entscheidung über einen Antrag dauerte es im Durchschnitt 22 Tage. Die\u0000 Hälfte der Widersprüche wurde zugunsten der Leistungsberechtigten\u0000 entschieden.","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48958386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unterstützung der Rückkehr an den Arbeitsplatz nach\u0000 stationärer psychiatrischer Behandlung","authors":"","doi":"10.1055/a-2041-4140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2041-4140","url":null,"abstract":"Eine in der Zeitschrift European Psychiatry erschienene clusterrandomisierte Studie\u0000 hat eine einfache Intervention für stationär behandelte Patientinnen\u0000 und Patienten mit psychischen Erkrankungen geprüft, um die Rückkehr\u0000 an den Arbeitsplatz zu unterstützen. Das Angebot wurde von\u0000 Sozialarbeiterinnen und Sozialarbeitern umgesetzt und unterstützte\u0000 insbesondere die konkrete Planung der beruflichen Wiedereingliederung. Insgesamt\u0000 wurden fünf Sitzungen im Verlauf der stationären Behandlung und drei\u0000 in den nachfolgenden sechs Monaten durchgeführt. Bei Bedarf wurde der\u0000 Arbeitgeber einbezogen. Die Kontrollgruppe erhielt die sonst übliche\u0000 Behandlung. In die Studie wurden 268 Personen mit überwiegend affektiven\u0000 Störungen eingeschlossen. Die durchschnittliche Erkrankungsdauer betrug 10\u0000 Jahre. Zum Zeitpunkt der Entlassung waren die Interventionsgruppe und die\u0000 Kontrollgruppe hinsichtlich der Behandlungsdauer, Erkrankungsschwere oder der\u0000 subjektiv empfundenen Bereitschaft zur Rückkehr an den Arbeitsplatz\u0000 vergleichbar.","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46059830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}