Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided neuraxial puncture: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. 超声引导与地标引导神经穿刺的有效性和安全性:随机临床试验的系统综述、网络荟萃分析和试验序列分析。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105547
Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho, Willgney Porto Genuino, Maria Clara Vieira Morais, Heleno de Paiva Oliveira, Adolfo Igor Rodrigues, Kariem El-Boghdadly
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided neuraxial puncture: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho, Willgney Porto Genuino, Maria Clara Vieira Morais, Heleno de Paiva Oliveira, Adolfo Igor Rodrigues, Kariem El-Boghdadly","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105547","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105547","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data suggest that preprocedural ultrasound may improve the efficacy of central neuraxial puncture. However, it remains uncertain whether these findings can be extended to various clinical scenarios, including diverse patient populations and the application of real-time ultrasound guidance. Additionally, it is unclear whether ultrasound-guided techniques improve safety and patient-centered outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched six databases for randomized trials of adult patients undergoing neuraxial puncture, comparing real-time ultrasound, preprocedural ultrasound, and landmark palpation for efficacy, safety and patient-centered outcomes. Our primary outcome was a failed first-attempt neuraxial puncture. After two-person screening and data extraction, meta-analyses were conducted and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was applied to assess the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 71 studies involving 7153 patients, both real-time ultrasound (OR 0.30; 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.15 to 0.58; low certainty) and preprocedural ultrasound (OR 0.33; 95% CrI 0.24 to 0.44; moderate certainty) showed a significant reduction in the risk of a failed first neuraxial puncture. Real-time ultrasound had the best performance for preventing first-attempt failures (low certainty evidence). Although real-time ultrasound was also the leading method for reducing the risk of complete neuraxial puncture failure, the results did not show a statistically significant difference when compared with landmark palpation. Preprocedural ultrasound, however, significantly reduced the odds of complete puncture failure (OR 0.29; 95% CrI 0.11 to 0.61). These ultrasound-guided approaches also contributed to a reduction in certain complications and increased patient satisfaction without any other significant differences in additional outcomes. Trial sequential analysis confirmed that sufficient information was achieved for our primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided neuraxial puncture improves efficacy, reduces puncture attempts and needle redirections, reduces complication risks, and increases patient satisfaction, with low to moderate certainty of evidence. Despite real-time ultrasound's high ranking, a clear superiority over preprocedural ultrasound is not established. These results could prompt anesthesiologists and other clinicians to reassess their neuraxial puncture techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"737-746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141321954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neuraxial anesthesia use in revision hip and knee arthroplasties: impact of periprosthetic joint infection and temporal trends. 轴向麻醉用于翻修髋关节和膝关节置换术:假体周围关节感染的影响和时间趋势。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2025-106857
Juliet Rowe, Periklis Giannakis, Alex Illescas, Junying Wang, Jiabin Liu, Stavros G Memtsoudis, Daniel Maalouf, Jashvant Poeran, Crispiana Cozowicz
{"title":"Neuraxial anesthesia use in revision hip and knee arthroplasties: impact of periprosthetic joint infection and temporal trends.","authors":"Juliet Rowe, Periklis Giannakis, Alex Illescas, Junying Wang, Jiabin Liu, Stavros G Memtsoudis, Daniel Maalouf, Jashvant Poeran, Crispiana Cozowicz","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106857","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106857","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anesthetic management with labor epidural analgesia of the parturient with severe factor VII deficiency: a case report. 对患有严重 VII 因子缺乏症的产妇进行分娩硬膜外镇痛的麻醉管理:病例报告。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105674
Benjamin Hyers, Camila Cabrera, Christopher Walsh, Anusha Reddy, Talia Strulowitz, Joshua Hamburger, Nakiyah Knibbs, Daniel Katz, Lauren Ferrara, Yaakov Beilin
{"title":"Anesthetic management with labor epidural analgesia of the parturient with severe factor VII deficiency: a case report.","authors":"Benjamin Hyers, Camila Cabrera, Christopher Walsh, Anusha Reddy, Talia Strulowitz, Joshua Hamburger, Nakiyah Knibbs, Daniel Katz, Lauren Ferrara, Yaakov Beilin","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105674","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Factor VII deficiency is considered a contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia due to the risk of an epidural hematoma.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 32 year old G1P0 parturient with severe factor VII deficiency presented for an anesthesiology consultation at 32 weeks gestation. Initial coagulation studies were significant for an elevated INR (2.0) and a low factor VII level of 6%. After interdisciplinary discussion, it was decided that neuraxial analgesia could be offered if her coagulation studies corrected after administration of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). The patient presented at 36 weeks gestation for a rFVIIa challenge. She received 22 mcg/kg rFVIIa and coagulation studies were analyzed 20 minutes later which showed complete correction of the coagulopathy. The patient presented to the hospital at 39 weeks and 3 days for delivery, received 2 mg rFVIIa and 20 minutes later, successfully received an epidural catheter. Her INR was monitored every 3 hours during her labor course and rFVIIa was given if the INR was 1.3 or greater. She required three additional doses over 22 hours. No bleeding or thrombotic events occurred, and the patient was discharged home without complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the safe management of an epidural catheter in a parturient with severe factor VII deficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"764-767"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141477958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiofrequency ablation versus intra-articular mesenchymal stem cell injection for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. 射频消融与关节内间充质干细胞注射治疗膝骨关节炎:系统综述与网络荟萃分析。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105526
Sukhee Park, Soyoon Park, Jae Ni Jang, Young-Soon Choi, Dong Seong Kim, Jeong Eun Sohn, Ji-Hoon Park
{"title":"Radiofrequency ablation versus intra-articular mesenchymal stem cell injection for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Sukhee Park, Soyoon Park, Jae Ni Jang, Young-Soon Choi, Dong Seong Kim, Jeong Eun Sohn, Ji-Hoon Park","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105526","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative disease and causes disability, pain and imposes a substantial burden on patients. Conventional treatments for knee OA show limited effectiveness. Consequently, innovative treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and intra-articular mesenchymal stem cells (IA MSC), have gained attention for addressing these limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared the efficacy of RFA and IA MSC for knee OA through a network meta-analysis (NMA).</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and handsearching. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RFA or IA MSC to conventional treatments for knee OA were included. The primary outcomes comprised the pain score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach, and the treatments were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 34 RCTs (n=2371). Our NMA revealed that RFA and IA MSC were significantly more effective than conventional treatments in managing pain at both 3 and 6 months with moderate certainty. Specifically, RFA demonstrated the highest SUCRA values, indicating its superior efficacy. For WOMAC scores, both RFA and MSC showed significant improvements at 3 months, with RFA maintaining its lead at 6 months, although MSC did not display significant superiority at this stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis suggests that RFA and MSC are resilient treatment options in knee OA. Despite some study heterogeneity, these treatments consistently outperformed conventional treatments, particularly in the short to mid-term, although with varying levels of certainty in their efficacy.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023492299.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"747-758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141322012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Subpectineal obturator nerve block reduces opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy: a triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. 髋关节镜术后会阴下闭孔神经阻滞可减少阿片类药物的用量:一项三盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105638
Christian Jessen, Ulrick Skipper Espelund, Lone Dragnes Brix, Thomas Dahl Nielsen, Bent Lund, Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen
{"title":"Subpectineal obturator nerve block reduces opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy: a triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Christian Jessen, Ulrick Skipper Espelund, Lone Dragnes Brix, Thomas Dahl Nielsen, Bent Lund, Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105638","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105638","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip arthroscopy causes severe pain during the first few hours in the postoperative care unit. This is probably due to the intraoperative stretching of the hip joint capsule. Pain relief requires high doses of opioids which may prolong recovery and may cause opioid-related adverse events.The majority of hip joint capsule nociceptors are located anteriorly. The obturator nerve innervates the anteromedial part of the hip joint capsule. We hypothesized that a subpectineal obturator nerve block using 15 ml bupivacaine 5 mg/mL with added epinephrine 5 μg/mL would reduce the opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>40 ambulatory hip arthroscopy patients were enrolled in this randomized, triple-blind controlled trial. All patients were allocated to a preoperative active or placebo subpectineal obturator nerve block. The primary outcome was opioid consumption for the first 3 hours in the postanesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes were pain, nausea, and hip adductor strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 patients were analyzed for the primary outcome. The mean intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in the subpectineal obturator nerve block group was 11.9 mg vs 19.7 mg in the placebo group (p<0.001). The hip adductor strength was significantly reduced in the active group. No other intergroup differences were observed regarding the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant reduction in the opioid consumption for patients receiving an active subpectineal obturator nerve block. The postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent reduction the first painful 3 hours was reduced by 40% for patients receiving a subpectineal obturator nerve block in this randomized, triple-blind trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>EudraCT database 2021-006575-42.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"719-724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141460737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute postoperative pain and catastrophizing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective, observational, single-center, cohort study. 单关节膝关节置换术后急性疼痛和灾难性反应:一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心队列研究。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105503
Anders Holten Springborg, Christian Bredgaard Jensen, Kirill Gromov, Anders Troelsen, Henrik Kehlet, Nicolai Bang Foss
{"title":"Acute postoperative pain and catastrophizing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective, observational, single-center, cohort study.","authors":"Anders Holten Springborg, Christian Bredgaard Jensen, Kirill Gromov, Anders Troelsen, Henrik Kehlet, Nicolai Bang Foss","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105503","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Pain catastrophizing is associated with acute pain after total knee arthroplasty. However, the association between pain catastrophizing and acute pain after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the incidence of predicted high-pain and low-pain responders, based on a preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Scale score >20 or ≤20, respectively, and the acute postoperative pain course in both groups. Patients undergoing UKA were consecutively included in this prospective observational cohort study. Pain at rest and during walking (5 m walk test) was evaluated preoperatively, at 24 hours postoperatively, and on days 2-7 using a pain diary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>125 patients were included, with 101 completing the pain diary. The incidence of predicted high-pain responders was 31% (95% CI 23% to 40%). The incidence of moderate to severe pain during walking at 24 hours postoperatively was 69% (95% CI 52% to 83%) in predicted high-pain responders and 66% (95% CI 55% to 76%) in predicted low-pain responders; OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.5 to 3.1). The incidence of moderate to severe pain at rest 24 hours postoperatively was 49% (95% CI 32% to 65%) in predicted high-pain responders and 28% (95% CI 19% to 39%) in predicted low-pain responders; OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 6.1; p=0.03). Pain catastrophizing was not associated with increased cumulated pain during walking on days 2-7.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of predicted high-pain responders in UKA was slightly lower than reported in total knee arthroplasty. Additionally, preoperative pain catastrophizing was not associated with acute postoperative pain during walking.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"706-711"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor regarding 'Transitioning from intrathecal bupivacaine to mepivacaine for same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty: a quality improvement study'. 致编辑的信,内容涉及 "在当天出院的全关节成形术中,从鞘内布比卡因过渡到甲哌卡因:一项质量改进研究"。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105778
Bradley Vost, Jashvant Poeran, Michelle Carley, Daniel Maalouf
{"title":"Letter to the editor regarding 'Transitioning from intrathecal bupivacaine to mepivacaine for same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty: a quality improvement study'.","authors":"Bradley Vost, Jashvant Poeran, Michelle Carley, Daniel Maalouf","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105778","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105778","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141494293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rectus sheath block added to parasternal block may improve postoperative pain control and respiratory performance after cardiac surgery: a superiority single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. 在胸骨旁阻滞基础上加用直肠鞘阻滞可改善心脏手术后疼痛控制和呼吸功能:一项优越性单盲随机对照临床试验。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105430
Alessandro Strumia, Giuseppe Pascarella, Domenico Sarubbi, Annalaura Di Pumpo, Fabio Costa, Maria Cristina Conti, Stefano Rizzo, Mariapia Stifano, Lara Mortini, Alessandra Cassibba, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Alessia Mattei, Alessandro Ruggiero, Felice E Agrò, Massimiliano Carassiti, Rita Cataldo
{"title":"Rectus sheath block added to parasternal block may improve postoperative pain control and respiratory performance after cardiac surgery: a superiority single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Alessandro Strumia, Giuseppe Pascarella, Domenico Sarubbi, Annalaura Di Pumpo, Fabio Costa, Maria Cristina Conti, Stefano Rizzo, Mariapia Stifano, Lara Mortini, Alessandra Cassibba, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Alessia Mattei, Alessandro Ruggiero, Felice E Agrò, Massimiliano Carassiti, Rita Cataldo","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105430","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The population undergoing cardiac surgery confronts challenges from uncontrolled post-sternotomy pain, with possible adverse effects on outcome. While the parasternal block can improve analgesia, its coverage may be insufficient to cover epigastric area. In this non-blinded randomized controlled study, we evaluated the analgesic and respiratory effect of adding a rectus sheath block to a parasternal block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>58 patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy were randomly assigned to receive parasternal block with rectus sheath block (experimental) or parasternal block with epigastric exit sites of chest drains receiving surgical infiltration of local anesthetic (control). The primary outcome of this study was pain at rest at extubation. We also assessed pain scores at rest and during respiratory exercises, opiate consumption and respiratory performance during the first 24 hours after extubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (IQR) maximum pain scores (on a 0-10 Numeric Rate Scale (NRS)) at extubation were 4 (4, 4) in the rectus sheath group and 5 (4, 5) in the control group (difference 1, p value=0.03). Rectus sheath block reduced opioid utilization by 2 mg over 24 hours (IC 95% 0.0 to 2.0; p<0.01), reduced NRS scores at other time points, and improved respiratory performance at 6, 12, and 24 hours after extubation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of a rectus sheath block with a parasternal block improves analgesia for cardiac surgery requiring chest drains emerging in the epigastric area.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05764616.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"712-718"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141322013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety of uninterrupted anticoagulation use in patients undergoing hemodialysis access creation with regional anesthesia: a research report. 区域麻醉下血液透析通路建立患者不间断抗凝治疗的安全性研究报告。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2025-106773
Melissa Cruz, James J Fitzgibbon, Abena-Appah Sampong, Patrick Heindel, Lucinda R Holden-Wingate, Dirk M Hentschel, C Keith Ozaki, Felicity Billings, Kamen Vlassakov, Mohamad Anas Hussain
{"title":"Safety of uninterrupted anticoagulation use in patients undergoing hemodialysis access creation with regional anesthesia: a research report.","authors":"Melissa Cruz, James J Fitzgibbon, Abena-Appah Sampong, Patrick Heindel, Lucinda R Holden-Wingate, Dirk M Hentschel, C Keith Ozaki, Felicity Billings, Kamen Vlassakov, Mohamad Anas Hussain","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106773","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144994333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recommendations for disclosure of artificial intelligence in scientific writing and publishing: a regional anesthesia and pain medicine modified Delphi study. 在科学写作和出版中披露人工智能的建议:一项区域麻醉和止痛药修正的德尔菲研究。
IF 3.5 2区 医学
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2025-106852
Michael R Fettiplace, Anuj Bhatia, Yian Chen, Steven L Orebaugh, Michael Gofeld, Rodney A Gabriel, Daniel I Sessler, Hannah Lonsdale, Brittani Bungart, Christopher P Cheng, Garrett W Burnett, Lichy Han, Matthew Wiles, Steve Coppens, Thomas Joseph, Kristin L Schreiber, Thomas Volk, Richard D Urman, Vesela P Kovacheva, Christopher L Wu, Edward R Mariano, Vivian H Y Ip
{"title":"Recommendations for disclosure of artificial intelligence in scientific writing and publishing: a regional anesthesia and pain medicine modified Delphi study.","authors":"Michael R Fettiplace, Anuj Bhatia, Yian Chen, Steven L Orebaugh, Michael Gofeld, Rodney A Gabriel, Daniel I Sessler, Hannah Lonsdale, Brittani Bungart, Christopher P Cheng, Garrett W Burnett, Lichy Han, Matthew Wiles, Steve Coppens, Thomas Joseph, Kristin L Schreiber, Thomas Volk, Richard D Urman, Vesela P Kovacheva, Christopher L Wu, Edward R Mariano, Vivian H Y Ip","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106852","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the scientific process is advancing at a remarkable speed, thanks to continued innovations in large language models. While AI provides widespread benefits, including editing for fluency and clarity, it also has drawbacks, including fabricated content, perpetuation of bias, and lack of accountability. The editorial board of <i>Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine</i> (RAPM) therefore sought to develop best practices for AI usage and disclosure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A steering committee from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine used a modified Delphi process to address definitions, disclosure requirements, authorship standards, and editorial oversight for AI use in publishing. The committee reviewed existing publication guidelines and identified areas of ambiguity, which were translated into questions and distributed to an expert workgroup of authors, reviewers, editors, and AI researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two survey rounds, with 91% and 87% response rates, were followed by focused discussion and clarification to identify consensus recommendations. The workgroup achieved consensus on recommendations to authors about definitions of AI, required items to report, disclosure locations, authorship stipulations, and AI use during manuscript preparation. The workgroup formulated recommendations to reviewers about monitoring and evaluating the responsible use of AI in the review process, including the endorsement of AI-detection software, identification of concerns about undisclosed AI use, situations where AI use may necessitate the rejection of a manuscript, and use of checklists in the review process. Finally, there was consensus about AI-driven work, including required and optional disclosures and the use of checklists for AI-associated research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our modified Delphi study identified practical recommendations on AI use during the scientific writing and editorial process. The workgroup highlighted the need for transparency, human accountability, protection of patient confidentiality, editorial oversight, and the need for iterative updates. The proposed framework enables authors and editors to harness AI's efficiencies while maintaining the fundamental principles of responsible scientific communication and may serve as an example for other journals.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418700/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144978862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信