AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY最新文献_第4页

Those Things Which Are Written in Romance: Language and Law Teaching in Thirteenth-Century England 那些写在罗曼史上的东西:13世纪英国的语言和法律教学

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-11-18 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac020

Thomas McSweeney

引用次数: 0

The Tragic Pragmatism of the Wagner Act 瓦格纳法案的悲剧实用主义

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac019

Daniel Judt

{"title":"The Tragic Pragmatism of the Wagner Act","authors":"Daniel Judt","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/njac019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njac019","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The Wagner Act established a right to collective action as the keystone of industrial democracy. In doing so, it also articulated a radical conception of the self: that individuals form genuine desires and attain full self-actualization through collective action. This conception ran counter to the traditional liberal idea of selfhood, which took possessive individualism as the fundament of democratic governance. This paper places the Wagner Act and its reception in the context of changing conceptions of the self in American political thought from 1920 to 1950. The Wagner Act derived its conception of democratic activity from a pragmatist and progressivist theory of the “social self.” But its reception took place amidst a very different intellectual context. By midcentury, a liberal hostility to “mass society” and its deleterious effects on individual choice had repudiated the older pragmatist collectivism. In other words, the Act’s core provision—the notion of collective action as central to the formation of workers’ individual desires—was born of a dying moment in American thought. The immediate hostility that the new labor law regime faced in Congress and the courts was a consequence, in part, of that disjuncture.","PeriodicalId":54164,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86548405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

William Phelan, Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice: Rethinking the Landmark Decisions of the Foundational Period 威廉·费兰:《欧洲法院的重大判决:对奠基时期里程碑式判决的再思考》

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac015

Jaka Kukavica

引用次数: 0

Russell Sandberg, Subversive Legal History: A Manifesto for the Future of Legal Education 罗素·桑德伯格:《颠覆性法律史:法律教育未来宣言》

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-07-27 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac014

W. Eves

引用次数: 0

Inge Van Hulle, Britain and International Law in West Africa 英奇·范·胡勒，英国与西非国际法

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac012

Joyman Lee

引用次数: 0

The Art of Interpretation or the Art of Construction? The Case of Gestorum—A Constitutional Treatise by Andrzej Maksymilian Fredro 阐释的艺术还是建构的艺术?格斯托尔案——安德烈·马克西米利安·弗里德里罗的宪法论著

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac001

Marek Tracz-Tryniecki,J Patrick Higgins

{"title":"The Art of Interpretation or the Art of Construction? The Case of Gestorum—A Constitutional Treatise by Andrzej Maksymilian Fredro","authors":"Marek Tracz-Tryniecki,J Patrick Higgins","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/njac001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njac001","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Andrzej Maksymilian Fredro was a seventeenth-century Polish statesman whose works on Polish legal theory and history are generally underappreciated. Whenever he is mentioned, it is generally as a defender of the institution liberum veto, which is nearly universally blamed for the decline and eventually collapse of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. This article is part of a contemporary attempt to reignite academic interest in Fredro by bring his work to the attention of comparative constitutional scholars and legal historians, as well as to rehabilitate his reputation. More concretely, it examines the Gestorum, his first major work and a historical treatise, in order to recreate Fredro’s theories of constitutional interpretation in contemporary theoretical parlance: his theory of casus qui facit leges as a constitutional moment, interpretatio/ratio legislatoris vs verbis legis as legislators’ intentionalism vs textualism, and his interpretation vs explication as interpretation vs construction. These latter two sets of distinctions are particularly relevant to ongoing debates about originalistic approaches within comparative constitutional theory and legal history.","PeriodicalId":54164,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY","volume":"338 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138516944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac011

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac006

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac009

引用次数: 1

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 0.3

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ajlh/njac005

引用次数: 0