Philosophy of Management最新文献_第4页

Reconstructing the Moral Logic of the Stakeholder Approach, and Reconsidering the Participation Requirement 重构利益相关者路径的道德逻辑，反思参与要求

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2023-02-04 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00227-y

Marc A. Cohen

引用次数: 1

Toward a Constructive Critique of Managerial Agency: MacIntyre’s Contribution to Strategy as Practice 走向管理代理的建设性批判：麦金太尔对战略实践的贡献

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-023-00229-4

C. Bernacchio

引用次数: 1

How Digital Technology Shapes Self-Consciousness in Work Relationships? Reference to Hegel 数字技术如何塑造工作关系中的自我意识？参考黑格尔

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00225-0

Albena Neschen

引用次数: 1

Writing, Violence and Writing the Non-Western Other in Business Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Alterity 商业伦理中的写作、暴力和非西方他者写作:走向另类伦理

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00228-x

D. Jayawardena

引用次数: 0

Why does Faithful Epistemic Representation Matter for Management Practices? The Case of the Natural Environment in Management Theory. 为什么忠诚的认识论代表对管理实践很重要？管理理论中的自然环境案例。

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-06 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00220-5

Rose Hiquet, Claire Wordley, Shahzad Ansari

引用次数: 1

Sensemaking of COVIDian Crisis for Work and Organization. 感知 COVIDian 危机对工作和组织的影响。

IF 1

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-19 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00212-5

Shradha Kundra, Rohit Dwivedi

引用次数: 0

Popper's Critical Rationalism as a Response to the Problem of Induction: Predictive Reasoning in the Early Stages of the Covid-19 Epidemic. 波普尔的批判理性主义对归纳法问题的回应:新冠疫情早期阶段的预测推理。

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00203-6

Tuomo Peltonen

{"title":"Popper's Critical Rationalism as a Response to the Problem of Induction: Predictive Reasoning in the Early Stages of the Covid-19 Epidemic.","authors":"Tuomo Peltonen","doi":"10.1007/s40926-022-00203-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00203-6","url":null,"abstract":"The extent of harm and suffering caused by the coronavirus pandemic has prompted a debate about whether the epidemic could have been contained, had the gravity of the crisis been predicted earlier. In this paper, the philosophical debate on predictive reasoning is framed by Hume's problem of induction. Hume argued that it is rationally unjustified to move from the finite observations of past incidences to the predictions of future events. Philosophy has offered two major responses to the problem of induction: the pragmatic induction of Peirce and the critical rationalism of Popper. It is argued that of these two, Popper's critical rationalism provides a more potent tool for preparing for unanticipated events such as the Covid-19 pandemic. Popper's notion of risky predictions equips strategic foresight with clear hypotheticals regarding potential crisis scenarios. Peirce's pragmatic induction, instead, leans on probabilities that are slower to be amended as unexpected events start unfolding. The difference between the two approaches is demonstrated through a case study of the patterns of reasoning within the World Health Organization in the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40926-022-00203-6.","PeriodicalId":54136,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"7-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589766/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9115528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rational Egoism Virtue-Based Ethical Beliefs and Subjective Happiness: An Empirical Investigation. 理性利己主义美德伦理信仰与主观幸福感的实证研究。

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00207-2

Jeffrey Overall, Steven Gedeon

{"title":"Rational Egoism Virtue-Based Ethical Beliefs and Subjective Happiness: An Empirical Investigation.","authors":"Jeffrey Overall, Steven Gedeon","doi":"10.1007/s40926-022-00207-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00207-2","url":null,"abstract":"The fields of positive psychology, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and goal-setting have all demonstrated that individuals can modify their beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors to improve their subjective happiness. But which ethical beliefs affect happiness positively? In comparison to ethical belief systems such as deontology, consequentialism, and altruism, rational egoism appears to be alone in suggesting that an individual's long-term self-interest and subjective happiness is possible, desirable, and moral. Albeit an important theoretical foundation of the rational egoism philosophy, the relationship between rational egoism and subjective happiness has yet to be investigated empirically. Using (Overall and Gedeon, Business and Professional Ethics. 38:43-78, 2018) 24-item rational egoism scale, we test this relationship on a random sample of 534 full-time American workers using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Consistent with rational egoism theory, the main contribution to knowledge of this research is finding a statistically significant relationship between rational egoism and subjective happiness. Implications for practice and areas for future study are suggested.","PeriodicalId":54136,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"51-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335463/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9105993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Reflecting on Practice: An interview with Nigel Laurie 反思实践：奈杰尔·劳里访谈录

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2022-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00221-4

Eva E. Tsahuridu

引用次数: 2

Effective Management and Skepticism: Exploring Criteria in Judging Outcomes 有效的管理和怀疑:探索判断结果的标准

IF 1.2

Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI: 10.1007/s40926-022-00226-z

J. Idler

引用次数: 0