{"title":"Communities as inventors: Rethinking positive protection of traditional knowledge through patents","authors":"Anik Bhaduri","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12279","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jwip.12279","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional knowledge of indigenous communities often overlaps with spiritual traditions in which certain biogenetic resources are understood to be “sacred”. Accordingly, one of the key concerns of these communities is to retain control over the manner in which the knowledge is used so as to ensure that its sanctity is preserved. While much of the literature on the protection of traditional knowledge revolves around defensive protection, some commentators have argued for positive protection using patent law by recognizing the entire community as inventors and vesting property rights in perpetuity with the community as a whole. This paper observes that such positive protection through patents is consistent with the TRIPS Agreement and is likely to be successful in combating biopiracy but suffers from one crucial flaw—even if the community owns patent rights over a biogenetic resource, the community has no means to ensure that a potential licensee of the patent would adhere to the religious protocols of the community. Accordingly, it argues for the incorporation of collective moral rights rooted in indigenous law into the legal framework governing the licensing of traditional knowledge patent with a view to ensuring that indigenous communities can preserve their cultural heritage even after such community patents are licensed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 3","pages":"414-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77819956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Role of open innovation and patents on strategic decision making","authors":"Soumya P. Patra","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12277","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jwip.12277","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The fourth industrial revolution, as it is popularly known, is transforming the overall ecosystem of business and is swiftly affecting the structure of organizations with respect to their working strategy. It is leading to enhanced collaboration and cross-application of center-specific fundamentals across various industries. As a result, collaboration and cross-licensing of technologies have become the norm rather than an exception. Open innovation, therefore, plays a critical role in various horizontal applications of industry-specific concepts. As a result, choices such as “keep or sell” or “make or buy” research and development (R&D) supplies have become extremely critical and significant. Therefore, patent-based research is required as an enabling tool for assisting research on an open innovation-based approach. This article projects an in-depth review of the research articles related to various aspects of open innovation and patents and their overall impact on firm performance. This article also suggests an open innovation model that cumulates the role of patents and institutional participation with a focus on firm performance. The impact of open innovation on firm performance is evaluated with respect to variables on market positioning, R&D capacity building with respect to technology lifecycle, the impact of intellectual property, for instance, the existence of valid patents and know-how, and the process of acquisition of technologies by such organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 3","pages":"381-413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73498158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Who judges plants? Scientific-legal judgement of varieties for plant breeder's rights","authors":"Hamish MacDonald","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12276","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jwip.12276","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An internationally standardised system of intellectual property protection for new varieties of plants is outlined by the Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants Convention. Within this system, member States must determine who will be responsible for assessing plant varieties. Jurisdictions have adopted divergent approaches to this question, with varying degrees and modes of government involvement in the assessment process. Taking Australia as a case study, this article explores a decentralised system of expert judgement where individuals accredited as Qualified Persons are authorised to judge new plant varieties. Drawing on extensive interviews, this article outlines Australia's Qualified Person system, including the accreditation, training, and supervision of Qualified Persons. I argue that the formal system of varietal assessment is underlaid and buttressed by a multiplicity of informal elements, including the tacit knowledge of Qualified Persons, audit processes, apprenticeship-like learning practices and interpersonal relationships of trust between Qualified Persons and government officials.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 3","pages":"357-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12276","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72981361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Licensing standard-essential patents in artificial intelligence-based apps: A theory on dynamic royalty pricing mechanism","authors":"Sunandan Baruah, Ankur P. Saikia","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12278","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jwip.12278","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Standard-essential patents (SEPs) are patents that are deemed essential to a specific technology standard, such as those used in wireless communication technologies. With the increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in a variety of applications, there is a greater demand for SEPs in the field of AI-based apps. However, licencing SEPs can be a complicated process, and there is no agreement on best practises for SEP licencing in AI-based apps. The adoption of a multifactor approach for determining FRAND royalty rates, the use of ex ante licencing to prevent patent hold-up, and the establishment of specialized dispute resolution mechanisms for SEP disputes are some of the proposed best practices for SEP licencing in AI-based apps. As potential solutions to the challenges associated with determining FRAND royalty rates in AI-based apps, this study proposed alternative royalty schemes, such as the use of a per-unit royalty rate or a revenue-sharing scheme.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 3","pages":"490-502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81603839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intellectual property rights in outer space: How can pharmaceutical companies protect COVID-19 vaccine and immunotherapy developments aboard the ISS US national laboratory?","authors":"Adnan Jashari, Stefani Stojchevska","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12270","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Believing that space pharmaceuticals might be the key to winning the battle against COVID-19, global pharmaceutical companies such as AstraZeneca and Sanofi Pasteur are currently collaborating with the International Space Station National Laboratory (ISS-NL) on research projects aiming to develop vaccine-and-immunotherapy products. The present legal regime for outer space, however, does not provide clear guidelines on safeguarding intellectual property rights (IPRs), due to the difficulties of reconciling the territorial nature of patent law and the nonterritorial nature of space law. Responding to such a legal gap, this research paper argues how pharmaceutical companies can protect such medical innovations by taking into consideration the international principles of space law addressing IPRs and extraterrestrial jurisdiction, as well as the legal regime of the ISS-NL. With the exception of the possibility of the barriers between the two areas of law not being insurmountable, the proposed COVID-19 TRIPS Waiver furthermore impacts space pharmaceuticals' IPRs and commercialization, which leads to the identification of some advantageous forms of agreements, including the Joint Endeavor Agreement, the Space Act Agreement, as well as the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement, for pharmaceutical companies defined as agreement partners with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 2","pages":"227-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50128417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Why patent waiver for Covid-19 vaccines and pharmaceuticals?","authors":"Mrityunjay Kumar, Nalin Bharti","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12269","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patent protection emerged as one of the most challenging barriers to the access to medicines, medical equipment, and vaccines as well for the treatment and containment of Covid-19 when it became a pandemic. The severe scarcity of vaccines and pharmaceutical products were weakening the fight against Covid-19, and endeavor to contain the recurrence of pandemic waves while mutation of the SARS-CoV-2 was also on the full swing. Therefore, India and South Africa jointly proposed for patent waiver at WTO in October 2020 to effectively deal with the short-supply of medicines, medical equipment, vaccines and high price concern related to these products. After 20 months of consultation and negotiations with major stakeholders, the WTO came up with decision on patent waiver in 12th Ministerial Conference (12th MC). The time taken to reach to the decision in the pandemic situation and the narrow scope of the decision is a serious concern for the entire world to deal effectively with Covid-19 and its variants. This paper attempts to analyse the patent waiver in the context of the agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). It discusses patent barriers, alternative measures and needs for equitable access to vaccines and pharmaceuticals amidst the pandemic. Paper applies the qualitative methodology of research mainly content analysis method in the framework of contextualisation, decontextualisation, and recontextualisation. Results show that suspending certain provisions of the TRIPS required for the production of vaccines and medicines would prove a crucial tool for economies to return to its pre-Covid-19 era. Paper concludes that, patent waiver can be one of the most important tool to fight the Covid-19 (as WHO has not yet declared the end of pandemic) and will pave the way to deal with any such unknown future pandemic effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 2","pages":"195-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50122546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Digital Copyright Law, A Comparative Study of the Limitation and Exceptions Relating To Education, Betsy Vinolia Rajasingh.: Thomson Reuters First Edition, 2020. 348, Price: Rs. 750/-, ISBN 978-93-89891-35-5.","authors":"Manish Kumar, Nandan Sharma, Maya Devi","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12272","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 2","pages":"291-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50118415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Other options to resolve patent infringement dispute, experiences from China","authors":"Ma Biyu, Yu Dingming","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12273","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While civil litigation (CL) was expected to play a major role in resolving patent infringement disputes, administrative adjudication (AA) has become the preferred channel for patentees to protect their rights in China since 2015. The number of AA cases significantly increased during the study period of 2010–2021. Our research finds that AA does not particularly favor patentees. By comparing the rules of CL and AA, we also find that low cost and high efficiency are the two major advantages of AA. Besides these traits, the motivations for patentees to initiate AA are the lack of risks in AA procedure and its valuable outcomes. Understanding the real motivation for the application of AA could be a reference for improving the patent infringement dispute system.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 2","pages":"273-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50118416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Geographical indications and traditional cultural expressions: A comparative legal analysis of the GI laws of Indonesia and India and a case study analysis","authors":"Sreenath K. P., Anson C. J.","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12274","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jwip.12274","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many of the geographical indications (GI) in developing countries are intellectual creations with incredible uniqueness generated by traditional communities and local people. These products are linked to the culture of that community and hence can be considered as traditional cultural expressions (TCE). Dev gangjee and Steven Van Uytsel and argued that TCE can be protected under the law of GI. Moreover, there are many similarities between GI and TCEs. These two forms share some unique characteristics that other intellectual property systems are not indulged in as well as not in concern with of many nations. Handicrafts, textile products, pottery works, jewellery works are some prime examples of TCEs protected under the law of GI in India and Indonesia. This article intends to validate the compatibility of GI laws in providing space for TCEs and give some suggestions for enhanced compatibility. Case study approach has been used as methodology and that the study presumes that the present GI laws in India and Indonesia are not capable of adequately protecting TCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 3","pages":"339-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86099111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A re-examination of the plant variety act 2021 from the perspective of pre-exisiting obligation to protect plant varieties","authors":"Oluwaseun S. Fapetu","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12271","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper examines the newly enacted Plant Variety Act in Nigeria in relation to the obligations of Nigeria to protect plant varieties. The paper views these obligations from different perspectives in the protection of diverse interest related to plant varieties. The paper finds that the Act offers an unbalanced protection of right which strongly protects the intellectual property rights of breeders without recourse to the other interest obligated to be protected by several international agreement which Nigeria is a signatory to especially farmers', communities and biodiversity interests. The paper advocates for an amendment of the Act to ensure a balanced and compliant legal framework for the protection of plant varieties in Nigeria.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"26 2","pages":"259-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50145237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}