Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia最新文献_第6页

Forms of Remuneration for Free Software Production: A Reducible Complexity 自由软件产品的报酬形式:可简化的复杂性

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.2478/subbs-2019-0005

Emrah Irzık

引用次数: 0

Socialist Romania and the Futility of Cold War Analysis 社会主义罗马尼亚与冷战分析的徒劳

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/subbs-2018-0012

Steve Randall

引用次数: 1

Reflections on Research in Romania 对罗马尼亚研究的思考

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/SUBBS-2018-0011

S. Beck

引用次数: 0

Was There a ‘Gypsy Problem’ in Socialist Romania? From Suppressing ‘Nationalism’ to Recognition of a National Minority 社会主义罗马尼亚存在“吉普赛人问题”吗?从压制“民族主义”到承认少数民族

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/SUBBS-2018-0014

László Fosztó

引用次数: 5

Fieldwork in Socialist Romania: The Umass Romanian Research Group 社会主义罗马尼亚的实地考察:马萨诸塞大学罗马尼亚研究小组

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/SUBBS-2018-0008

M. Anăstăsoaie, László Fosztó, Iuliu Rațiu

{"title":"Fieldwork in Socialist Romania: The Umass Romanian Research Group","authors":"M. Anăstăsoaie, László Fosztó, Iuliu Rațiu","doi":"10.2478/SUBBS-2018-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/SUBBS-2018-0008","url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia originates from the panel “Shaping the Field of Romanian Studies: American & Romanian Scholars at Work” chaired by Vintilă Mihăilescu and organized by Iuliu Rațiu at the Conference of the Society for Romanian Studies (SRS), Bucharest 26-29 June, 2018. In line with the general theme of the conference, “#Romania100: Looking Forward through the Past”, the participants, all of whom had done research in Romania, were invited to present their views on what shaped the field of Romanian Studies, with a focus on academic exchanges and the mutual influence between international and Romanian scholars. Three participants in this panel, László Fosztó, David Kideckel, and Steven Sampson have submitted their revised presentations for this issue. Another panel member, Sam Beck, was unable to attend. Viorel Anăstăsoaie attended the panel; finally, Steven Randall did not attend the panel but graciously accepted later to reflect back on his fieldwork experience. In the transition from panel discussions to printed essays, it became apparent that the contribution of the University of Massachusetts Romanian Research Group to the field of Romanian Studies and, more specifically, to anthropology deserved more attention. The members of the Romanian Research Group and their major research interests are: Sam Beck―marginal peasant communities, regional political economy; John W. Cole―village socio-economic organization, domestic economy; David A. Kideckel―agricultural collectivization, peasant-workers; Marilyn McArthur―inter-ethnic relations; Steven Randall― domestic economy, mountain communities; and, Steven Sampson―urbanization, regional planning (Kideckel and Sampson, 1984).","PeriodicalId":53506,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44659792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

’Did You Arrive by Train or by Ship?:’ Transportation as Politics and Metaphor in Fieldwork in Socialist Romania “你是坐火车还是坐船来的？”作为政治和隐喻的运输在社会主义罗马尼亚的田野调查中

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/SUBBS-2018-0010

D. Kideckel

{"title":"’Did You Arrive by Train or by Ship?:’ Transportation as Politics and Metaphor in Fieldwork in Socialist Romania","authors":"D. Kideckel","doi":"10.2478/SUBBS-2018-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/SUBBS-2018-0010","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay considers how transportation and mobility model the character of Romanian-American interaction during fieldwork from the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s. Transportation in socialist Romania was a register of modernization and regime legitimation as well as an absolute threat to that legitimation. Official suspicions of movement and political concern about transportation translated into differentially restricting, policing, and limiting availability of transportation. In contrast anthropological fieldwork is predicated on movement while Western culture also claimed free mobility as a cultural good. These different teleologies provoked diverse disjunctures in my interactions with Romanians. While I engaged with Romanians naively, my travelling together with people either gave them cover for resistance or provoked their fear of political exposure. Sharing transportation resources with Romanians encouraged others’ concerns about my alleged political bias or was used to affirm socialist superiority. In other words, transportation during socialism was never neutral, but freighted politically and culturally confrontational.","PeriodicalId":53506,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42259764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Family Practices Across Generations and National Borders 跨代跨国界的家庭实践

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/subbs-2018-0015

Ionuț Földes, V. Savu

{"title":"Family Practices Across Generations and National Borders","authors":"Ionuț Földes, V. Savu","doi":"10.2478/subbs-2018-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2018-0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Part of the mobility and migration process, family relationships and mutual support are subject of various transformations. Spatial separation between family members creates a specific setting for analysis which leads to the necessity of understanding how family practices are arranged and developed across time and distance. The present study focuses on the dyad emigrated adult children and non-migrated elderly parents living in Romania and on the types of intergenerational family practices that occur between these dyads across national borders. Our analysis of family practices relies on tracing certain set of actions taken by family members in order to maintain, consolidate, and ultimately to display family solidarity. We consider here various forms of practices, namely technological mediated contacts, visits, time-consuming practical support and financial assistance. Analyses are based on the national survey entitled Intergenerational solidarity in the context of work migration abroad. The situation of elderly left at home, which provides empirical data about the relationships from a distance between elderly parents living in Romania and their migrant adult children. Descriptive statistics are provided in order to assess the flow directions, the frequency and the intensity of each type of intergenerational support. Our empirical evidence highlights that transnational support is asymmetrical and multidirectional. Results also support that intergenerational support and family relationships can no longer be theoretically approached in terms of a simple dichotomy.","PeriodicalId":53506,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49030573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How I Became a ‘Romania Expert’ 我如何成为“罗马尼亚专家”

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/subbs-2018-0009

S. Sampson

引用次数: 1

Translating John V. Murra’s ‘The Economic Organization of the Inca State’ into Romanian as ‘Obra DE Amor’ 将John V.Murra的《印加国家的经济组织》翻译成罗马尼亚语“Obra DE Amor”

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.2478/subbs-2018-0013

M. Anăstăsoaie

引用次数: 0

The Forest as a Territory for the Operations of Planetary Urbanisation: Sorting Forest Areas on the Vasser Valley in Romania 森林作为行星城市化运作的领地：对罗马尼亚瓦塞尔山谷的森林区域进行分类

Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.2478/subbs-2018-0003

Iulia Hurducaș

{"title":"The Forest as a Territory for the Operations of Planetary Urbanisation: Sorting Forest Areas on the Vasser Valley in Romania","authors":"Iulia Hurducaș","doi":"10.2478/subbs-2018-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2018-0003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Lefebvre’s 1970 prophecy of the total urbanisation of society has come true with the expansion of the urban into natural and rural territories. For Lefebvre, the question of nature is closed by its ‘steady, violent death’ (Lefebvre, 2003) and its replacement by a ‘second nature’ (Schmid, 2014; Smith, 2008). This closure accounts at an epistemic level, for the dominance of the urban (Krause, 2013; Brenner and Schmid, 2014). Far from being closed, the question of nature is renewed within the present conditions of planetary urbanisation, as the interiorised non-urban is ‘operationalised’ to sustain urban growth, thus making the non-city ‘an essential terrain of capitalist urbanisation’ (Brenner, 2016). In what follows, I present how the Romanian forest is operationalised as a territory of planetary urbanisation through forest management practices. Looking into the negotiations and manipulations on the ground provides a way to ‘pay attention’ (Stengers, 2010) to those practices that sort and select natural areas. In the face of the recorded disappearance of the forest, the effort of making visible the rationality of planning, and the challenges that are posed upon it inscribes itself within an ‘ethics of visibility’ (Roberts, 2012; Topalovic, 2016).","PeriodicalId":53506,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49322009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0