Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies最新文献

Why the European Convention on Human Rights Still Matters 为什么《欧洲人权公约》仍然重要

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2024.1

Síofra O’leary

引用次数: 0

Restoring Dialogical Rule of Law in the European Union: Janus in the Mirror 恢复欧盟的对话式法治：镜中的雅努斯

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2023.16

D. Kochenov

引用次数: 0

Implementing the Rule of Law in the European Union: How Long Trapped in Penelope's Spinning Wheel from Article 2 of the TEU? 在欧盟实施法治：从《欧盟运作条约》（TEU）第 2 条开始，珀涅罗珀的纺车还要转多久？

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2023.17

Carlos J. Moreiro González

引用次数: 0

The Doctor in Free Movement Law: Expertise, Duty, and Accountability 自由流动法中的医生：专业知识、义务和责任

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2023.13

Barend van Leeuwen

{"title":"The Doctor in Free Movement Law: Expertise, Duty, and Accountability","authors":"Barend van Leeuwen","doi":"10.1017/cel.2023.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.13","url":null,"abstract":"This Article provides an empirical analysis of all free movement of doctors cases decided by the CJEU. The aim of the Article is twofold: to provide a ‘characterisation’ of the type of doctors who rely on free movement law, and to make a link between their reliance on free movement law and the concept of medical professionalism. In what circumstances, and with what purpose, do doctors rely on free movement law? And does their reliance on free movement law pose a risk to medical professionalism? The analysis shows that most cases before the CJEU focussed on the expertise and qualifications of doctors. Many cases were brought by groups of doctors or medical professional associations. In most cases, the aim of the doctor's reliance on free movement law was to defend medical professionalism. Nevertheless, some recent cases show that doctors do rely on free movement law to restrict their accountability towards patients or national healthcare systems. Moreover, these cases show that arguments based on free movement law are relied on in a broader range of non-specialised courts or tribunals. This makes it important that national courts continue to engage in a dialogue with the CJEU.","PeriodicalId":52109,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies","volume":"26 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139166075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism 宪法法院提出问题：初步参考机制的慎思潜力

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2023.15

Marek Pivoda

引用次数: 0

Challenging EU Sanctions against Russia: The Role of the Court, Judicial Protection, and Common Foreign and Security Policy 质疑欧盟对俄罗斯的制裁：法院的作用、司法保护和共同外交与安全政策

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2023.11

L. Lonardo

引用次数: 0

Building Castles in the Air? The EU Blocking Regulation and the Protection of the Interests of Private Parties 空中楼阁？欧盟《阻止条例》与私人利益保护

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2023.14

Tamás Szabados

引用次数: 0

The EU's ‘Massive and Targeted’ Sanctions in Response to Russian Aggression, a Contradiction in Terms 欧盟针对俄罗斯侵略的 "大规模、有针对性 "制裁是自相矛盾的

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2023.9

Alexandra Hofer

引用次数: 0

The Evolution of the Public Security Defence in EU Free Movement Law: Lessons from the Energy Sector 欧盟自由流动法中公共安全防御的演变:来自能源部门的经验教训

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2023.5

K. Huhta

引用次数: 0

Two Ways of Completing the European Fundamental Rights Union: Amendment to vs. Reinterpretation of Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights 完善欧洲基本权利联盟的两种途径：对《欧盟基本权利宪章》第51条的修正与重新解释

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/cel.2022.5

A. Jakab, Lando Kirchmair

{"title":"Two Ways of Completing the European Fundamental Rights Union: Amendment to vs. Reinterpretation of Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights","authors":"A. Jakab, Lando Kirchmair","doi":"10.1017/cel.2022.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2022.5","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this Article is to show that the enforcement of Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’) values vis-à-vis Member States could benefit from the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (‘CFR’) also in instances where the current interpretation of Article 51(1) CFR prevents this. This would be the case if the CFR were also applicable to purely domestic cases, eg—but not only—with regard to fundamental rights-relevant violations related to the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU. In this case, the European Court of Justice, which has already partly taken this path recently, could prevent the violation of core EU values. The most important historical challenge to those values in Europe today is the systematic dismantling of the rule of law and democracy in certain Member States. It is the very purpose of fundamental rights to provide answers to such dangers. When one speaks of the rule of law and democracy, one necessarily also means fundamental rights. This Article thus advocates an EU which perceives itself as a complete fundamental rights union. While the traditional interpretation of Article 51(1) CFR had a balanced division of competence between the EU and its Member States in mind, the disregard of Article 2 TEU values triggers a clausula rebus sic stantibus: the neat federal balance can only be upheld if both ends stick to the original promise made. It demonstrates two ways of completing the European fundamental rights union: treaty revision, on the one hand, and reinterpretation of Article 51 CFR, on the other hand. Both ways have in common that only a complete fundamental rights union can establish a system of fundamental rights protection that is uniform and thus equality-preserving in cases where national fundamental rights fail to provide sufficient protection.","PeriodicalId":52109,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"239 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46345873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1