Performance nutrition最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A 3D color model reports urine color similarly to a printed color chart with similar accuracy to determine a low vs. high urine concentration. 3D颜色模型报告尿液颜色类似于打印的颜色图表,具有相似的准确性,以确定低与高尿浓度。
Performance nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1186/s44410-025-00009-3
Raul Freire, Kinta D Schott, Brooke Butterick, Zack Stow, Parker Kooima, Sai Tejaswari Gopalakrishnan, Emily Dow, Jason C Siegler, Jefferey L Burgess, Floris C Wardenaar
{"title":"A 3D color model reports urine color similarly to a printed color chart with similar accuracy to determine a low vs. high urine concentration.","authors":"Raul Freire, Kinta D Schott, Brooke Butterick, Zack Stow, Parker Kooima, Sai Tejaswari Gopalakrishnan, Emily Dow, Jason C Siegler, Jefferey L Burgess, Floris C Wardenaar","doi":"10.1186/s44410-025-00009-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44410-025-00009-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urine color (Uc) assessment is impacted by container, volume, and light conditions, potentially influencing Uc scoring. This study aimed to evaluate a 3D Uc model vs. Printed Uc chart's accuracy for identifying a low vs. high urine concentration in the morning and afternoon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 73, 12% female, age: ~ 27 years) collected all urine voids for two consecutive days (32 h total), resulting in two partially concurrent 24-h urine collections that were compared with a morning and afternoon assessment. Median and [interquartile range] Uc differed between the Printed chart and 3D Uc model in the morning (2.0 [1.5-3.0] vs. 2.0 [2.0-4.0], <i>p</i> < 0.001), but not in the afternoon (2.0 [1.0 - 3.0] vs. 2.0 [1.0 - 3.0], <i>p</i> = 0.07). The models had a moderate correlation in the morning (<i>r</i> = 0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a strong correlation in the afternoon (<i>r</i> = 0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots revealed a slight bias (-0.60 and -0.27 for morning and afternoon, respectively), with significant reporting bias only for the morning, <i>p</i> = 0.04. The Area Under the Curve (AUC), to correctly classify urine concentration, was poor for morning Printed (0.62) and 3D (0.59) vs. fair for afternoon Printed (0.78) and 3D (0.74) for USG 24 h. Interestingly, the AUC for spot urine sample color was high (i.e., morning: 0.84 and 0.79), and afternoon: 0.91 and 0.92) for the Printed chart and 3D Uc model, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The printed chart and 3D Uc model presented similar scores but with slightly higher accuracy in the afternoon.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44410-025-00009-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":521058,"journal":{"name":"Performance nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447702/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145116053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信