NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
'We're not all the same'-how heterogeneity among smallholder tree-crop farmers in Ghana generates different degrees of food insecurity. “我们不都是一样的”——加纳种植树木的小农之间的异质性如何导致不同程度的粮食不安全。
NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/27685241.2025.2508143
Martha Ataa-Asantewaa, Mirjam A F Ros-Tonen, Bart de Steenhuijsen Piters, Joyeeta Gupta
{"title":"'We're not all the same'-how heterogeneity among smallholder tree-crop farmers in Ghana generates different degrees of food insecurity.","authors":"Martha Ataa-Asantewaa, Mirjam A F Ros-Tonen, Bart de Steenhuijsen Piters, Joyeeta Gupta","doi":"10.1080/27685241.2025.2508143","DOIUrl":"10.1080/27685241.2025.2508143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agricultural policies promoting smallholder participation in global markets for high-value commodities assume benefits for household food and nutrition security (FNS). However, existing literature often overlooks differences among smallholders. Using surveys, life interviews, and focus groups, this study applies the Household Access Food Insecurity Scale and dietary diversity scores to examine how household heterogeneity among Ghanaian tree-crop farmers affects FNS. Beyond standard FNS dimensions, we incorporate food sovereignty aspects like autonomy, cultural preferences, and sustainability. Only 47% of households were food secure, with significantly higher rates among those growing multiple tree crops (58%) and lower rates among landless farmers (30%). Households dependent on a single tree crop and landless households experience seasonal food insecurity due to low incomes. Interestingly, even the most economically secure multiple tree-crop households do not always achieve better dietary diversity, as spending choices influence nutrient intake. Cultural preferences impact FNS, particularly for older generations, while younger generations exhibit shifting dietary trends, highlighting the importance of cultural and generational factors. Intercropping is key to future FNS, given the widespread conversion of food-crop lands to tree-crop production. However, intercropping becomes difficult as tree crops mature, and excessive agrochemical use threatens sustainability and food safety. These findings underscore the need to explore intercropping in oil palm plantations, promote livelihood diversification, and raise awareness of more inclusive and sustainable farming practices. Future FNS research, policy, and practice must account for household heterogeneity and specific production contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":520973,"journal":{"name":"NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences","volume":"97 1","pages":"2508143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327230/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deciphering arable farmers' intentions: Attitudes, norms, perceived advantages, and the influential role of group discussions on insect frass adoption. 解读耕地农民的意图:态度、规范、感知优势,以及小组讨论对虫草采用的影响作用。
NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/27685241.2025.2501385
Kirstin L Foolen-Torgerson, Jaap Sok, Marcel Dicke, Alfons G J M Oude Lansink
{"title":"Deciphering arable farmers' intentions: Attitudes, norms, perceived advantages, and the influential role of group discussions on insect frass adoption.","authors":"Kirstin L Foolen-Torgerson, Jaap Sok, Marcel Dicke, Alfons G J M Oude Lansink","doi":"10.1080/27685241.2025.2501385","DOIUrl":"10.1080/27685241.2025.2501385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circularity in agriculture regarding the recycling of by-products from one form of production for use as inputs in another has become an urgent initiative as resources become more scarce and valuable. One potential example of circular agriculture is recycling the by-products of insect production (frass) as a crop and soil health promoter. This research investigates the drivers of arable farmers' intentions to trial insect frass as an input on their farms using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Innovation Decision Process. In addition, the influence of group discussion participation on the drivers of farmers' intentions is investigated to identify potential opportunities to influence the uptake of frass. Two questionnaires at two time-points (t<sub>1</sub> and t<sub>2</sub>) were distributed to forty-six Dutch arable farmers. Between these time-points, half of the farmers participated in group discussions where their first impressions of frass were shared amongst each other. The results from several regression models suggest that in t<sub>1</sub>, farmers' attitudes, perceived (descriptive) social norms and perceived behavioural control drive their intentions to trial frass. By t<sub>2</sub>, for those not in group discussions, attitudes were the only significant predictors of their intentions. For those who participated in the group discussion, the descriptive norm had a larger association with intentions than for those who did not. The results of this research contribute to an informed discussion on how group discussions, alongside policy-driven approaches, can serve as a mechanism for shaping perceptions and beliefs and influence the adoption of agricultural innovations like frass.</p>","PeriodicalId":520973,"journal":{"name":"NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences","volume":"97 1","pages":"2501385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327226/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信