解读耕地农民的意图:态度、规范、感知优势,以及小组讨论对虫草采用的影响作用。

NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/27685241.2025.2501385
Kirstin L Foolen-Torgerson, Jaap Sok, Marcel Dicke, Alfons G J M Oude Lansink
{"title":"解读耕地农民的意图:态度、规范、感知优势,以及小组讨论对虫草采用的影响作用。","authors":"Kirstin L Foolen-Torgerson, Jaap Sok, Marcel Dicke, Alfons G J M Oude Lansink","doi":"10.1080/27685241.2025.2501385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circularity in agriculture regarding the recycling of by-products from one form of production for use as inputs in another has become an urgent initiative as resources become more scarce and valuable. One potential example of circular agriculture is recycling the by-products of insect production (frass) as a crop and soil health promoter. This research investigates the drivers of arable farmers' intentions to trial insect frass as an input on their farms using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Innovation Decision Process. In addition, the influence of group discussion participation on the drivers of farmers' intentions is investigated to identify potential opportunities to influence the uptake of frass. Two questionnaires at two time-points (t<sub>1</sub> and t<sub>2</sub>) were distributed to forty-six Dutch arable farmers. Between these time-points, half of the farmers participated in group discussions where their first impressions of frass were shared amongst each other. The results from several regression models suggest that in t<sub>1</sub>, farmers' attitudes, perceived (descriptive) social norms and perceived behavioural control drive their intentions to trial frass. By t<sub>2</sub>, for those not in group discussions, attitudes were the only significant predictors of their intentions. For those who participated in the group discussion, the descriptive norm had a larger association with intentions than for those who did not. The results of this research contribute to an informed discussion on how group discussions, alongside policy-driven approaches, can serve as a mechanism for shaping perceptions and beliefs and influence the adoption of agricultural innovations like frass.</p>","PeriodicalId":520973,"journal":{"name":"NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences","volume":"97 1","pages":"2501385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciphering arable farmers' intentions: Attitudes, norms, perceived advantages, and the influential role of group discussions on insect frass adoption.\",\"authors\":\"Kirstin L Foolen-Torgerson, Jaap Sok, Marcel Dicke, Alfons G J M Oude Lansink\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/27685241.2025.2501385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Circularity in agriculture regarding the recycling of by-products from one form of production for use as inputs in another has become an urgent initiative as resources become more scarce and valuable. One potential example of circular agriculture is recycling the by-products of insect production (frass) as a crop and soil health promoter. This research investigates the drivers of arable farmers' intentions to trial insect frass as an input on their farms using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Innovation Decision Process. In addition, the influence of group discussion participation on the drivers of farmers' intentions is investigated to identify potential opportunities to influence the uptake of frass. Two questionnaires at two time-points (t<sub>1</sub> and t<sub>2</sub>) were distributed to forty-six Dutch arable farmers. Between these time-points, half of the farmers participated in group discussions where their first impressions of frass were shared amongst each other. The results from several regression models suggest that in t<sub>1</sub>, farmers' attitudes, perceived (descriptive) social norms and perceived behavioural control drive their intentions to trial frass. By t<sub>2</sub>, for those not in group discussions, attitudes were the only significant predictors of their intentions. For those who participated in the group discussion, the descriptive norm had a larger association with intentions than for those who did not. The results of this research contribute to an informed discussion on how group discussions, alongside policy-driven approaches, can serve as a mechanism for shaping perceptions and beliefs and influence the adoption of agricultural innovations like frass.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"2501385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327226/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2025.2501385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJAS impact in agricultural and life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2025.2501385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在农业中循环利用一种生产形式的副产品作为另一种生产形式的投入物已成为一项紧迫的倡议,因为资源变得更加稀缺和宝贵。循环农业的一个潜在例子是循环利用昆虫生产的副产品(草)作为作物和土壤健康促进剂。本研究运用计划行为理论和创新决策过程,探讨了耕农尝试将虫草作为投入物的动机。此外,小组讨论参与对农民意向驱动因素的影响进行了调查,以确定影响草料吸收的潜在机会。在两个时间点(t1和t2)向46名荷兰耕地农民发放了两份问卷。在这些时间点之间,一半的农民参加了小组讨论,在小组讨论中,他们分享了对草的第一印象。几个回归模型的结果表明,在t1中,农民的态度、感知到的(描述性的)社会规范和感知到的行为控制驱动了他们的尝试意图。到2岁时,对于那些没有参加小组讨论的人来说,态度是他们意图的唯一重要预测因素。对于那些参加小组讨论的人来说,描述性规范与意图的联系比那些没有参加小组讨论的人更大。这项研究的结果有助于就小组讨论如何与政策驱动的方法一起,作为一种形成观念和信念的机制,并影响诸如草业等农业创新的采用进行知情讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deciphering arable farmers' intentions: Attitudes, norms, perceived advantages, and the influential role of group discussions on insect frass adoption.

Deciphering arable farmers' intentions: Attitudes, norms, perceived advantages, and the influential role of group discussions on insect frass adoption.

Circularity in agriculture regarding the recycling of by-products from one form of production for use as inputs in another has become an urgent initiative as resources become more scarce and valuable. One potential example of circular agriculture is recycling the by-products of insect production (frass) as a crop and soil health promoter. This research investigates the drivers of arable farmers' intentions to trial insect frass as an input on their farms using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Innovation Decision Process. In addition, the influence of group discussion participation on the drivers of farmers' intentions is investigated to identify potential opportunities to influence the uptake of frass. Two questionnaires at two time-points (t1 and t2) were distributed to forty-six Dutch arable farmers. Between these time-points, half of the farmers participated in group discussions where their first impressions of frass were shared amongst each other. The results from several regression models suggest that in t1, farmers' attitudes, perceived (descriptive) social norms and perceived behavioural control drive their intentions to trial frass. By t2, for those not in group discussions, attitudes were the only significant predictors of their intentions. For those who participated in the group discussion, the descriptive norm had a larger association with intentions than for those who did not. The results of this research contribute to an informed discussion on how group discussions, alongside policy-driven approaches, can serve as a mechanism for shaping perceptions and beliefs and influence the adoption of agricultural innovations like frass.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信