Clinical traditional medicine and pharmacology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Baseline predictors of responders to auricular point acupressure in chronic low back pain. 慢性腰痛患者耳穴穴位按压应答者的基线预测因素。
Clinical traditional medicine and pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctmp.2025.200215
Nada Lukkahatai, Wanqi Chen, Jennifer Kawi, Hulin Wu, Claudia M Campbell, Johannes Thrul, Xinran Huang, Paul Christo, Constance M Johnson
{"title":"Baseline predictors of responders to auricular point acupressure in chronic low back pain.","authors":"Nada Lukkahatai, Wanqi Chen, Jennifer Kawi, Hulin Wu, Claudia M Campbell, Johannes Thrul, Xinran Huang, Paul Christo, Constance M Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.ctmp.2025.200215","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ctmp.2025.200215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a major cause of disability, with varied patient responses to treatments. Auricular point acupressure (APA) has shown potential as a non-pharmacological intervention, but individual responses may differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the predictability of baseline characteristics, including functional disability, symptom severity, and treatment expectancy, on clinically significant responses to APA in reducing pain and improving function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis was performed using data from a randomized controlled trial with 263 cLBP patients. Participants were randomly assigned to targeted APA (T-APA), non-targeted APA (NT-APA), or to a control group. APA responders were defined as those with at least a 1.5-point reduction in pain intensity or a 2.5-point improvement in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Predictors of response were assessed using logistic regression and machine learning models, including the Random Forest and Support Vector Machine (SVM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline pain, physical function, sleep disturbance, and treatment expectancy were key predictors. The Random Forest model had the highest accuracy for T-APA; however, logistic regression performed best in NT-APA. SVM was most accurate in the control group, with predictive accuracy varying by group (AUC 60.9%-80%). The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was found to be overly aggressive, often eliminating important variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the variability in APA treatment responses for cLBP. While predictive models provide useful insights, further research with larger datasets is needed to improve prediction accuracy and generalizability, enhancing personalized treatment approaches for cLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":520843,"journal":{"name":"Clinical traditional medicine and pharmacology","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095896/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信