发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

The Journal of legal medicine最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Ten Years of FDA Tobacco Regulation: Lessons for Public Health Stakeholders. 十年的FDA烟草法规:给公共卫生利益相关者的教训。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1868940
Desmond Jenson
{"title":"Ten Years of FDA Tobacco Regulation: Lessons for Public Health Stakeholders.","authors":"Desmond Jenson","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1868940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868940","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the 10 years that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been regulating tobacco products, the agency has been plagued with setbacks, some of its own making, and some the result of outside forces. What has been consistently true is that the public health community has not had as much of a voice as it should have until public health groups began filing lawsuits against the FDA. This article examines four areas of FDA regulation over the last decade in an attempt to qualitatively describe the work of the Center for Tobacco Products and identify opportunities for public health groups to have greater advocacy success in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"335-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868940","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Ten Years of the Tobacco Control Act in New York City. 纽约市烟草控制法案的十年。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1868939
Kevin R J Schroth
{"title":"Ten Years of the Tobacco Control Act in New York City.","authors":"Kevin R J Schroth","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1868939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes the impact of the 2009 Family Smoking and Prevention Tobacco Control Act (TCA) on local tobacco control through the lens of New York City's experience during the first 10 years after the TCA was enacted, highlighting one meaningful change and an opportunity that has failed to materialize. Much of the analysis regarding the TCA highlights the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) new powers and the TCA's impact on a national level. However, the TCA also opened up opportunities for local governments to pursue sound tobacco control policies that previously seemed fraught with high legal risk. This article focuses on two aspects of the TCA. First, the TCA weakened one of the tobacco industry's most reliable litigation weapons-preemption. Second, the TCA authorized the FDA to combat the illicit trade of tobacco products. Despite clear language in the TCA, the FDA has not signaled an inclination to take action regarding illicit trade in the context of tobacco tax evasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"321-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868939","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Progress Report on Opioid Litigation. 阿片类药物诉讼进展报告。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1868942
Richard C Ausness
{"title":"A Progress Report on Opioid Litigation.","authors":"Richard C Ausness","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1868942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868942","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .429 A. The Public Nuisance Issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 B. The Political Question Issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431 I. THE OPIOID ADDICTION “EPIDEMIC” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .432 II. THE PLAINTIFFS’ NARRATIVE (AND THE DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE) . . 433 III. OPIOID LITIGATION: PAST AND PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .434 IV. PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .442 V. REMAINING QUESTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .445 VI. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .446 ACKNOWLEDGMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"429-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868942","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Medicaid Expansion and Work Requirements in Georgia. 佐治亚州的医疗补助扩张和工作要求。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1854136
C David Whitson
{"title":"Medicaid Expansion and Work Requirements in Georgia.","authors":"C David Whitson","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1854136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1854136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Georgia's Section 1115 waiver application, titled \"Georgia Pathways to Coverage,\" seeks to simultaneously expand the state's Medicaid program and condition eligibility on work requirements. Though Section 1115 waivers have become a common vehicle for state Medicaid expansion, the imposition of work requirements is a novel departure. This article explores whether approval of Georgia Pathways to Coverage by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services can withstand judicial review. Recent precedent, beginning with the seminal <i>Stewart v. Azar</i> case, strongly suggests that a legal challenge would be successful on the merits. The features and justifications of Georgia Pathways to Coverage, examined in light of current data on work requirements in entitlement programs, make it likely that approval of the program would be found arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. However, unique aspects of Georgia Pathways to Coverage, as compared with similar state waivers, raise significant hurdles related to constitutional standing requirements and the appropriate judicial remedy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"391-419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1854136","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In the Supreme Court of the United States Docket No. 18-102. 在美国最高法院第18-102号案卷中。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1868959
Deirdre Cooney, John Moriarty, Emily Sklar, Jodi Hudson
{"title":"In the Supreme Court of the United States Docket No. 18-102.","authors":"Deirdre Cooney,&nbsp;John Moriarty,&nbsp;Emily Sklar,&nbsp;Jodi Hudson","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1868959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868959","url":null,"abstract":"Table of","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"467-498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868959","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Symposium Introduction: A Decade of the Tobacco Control Act: Progress, Setbacks, and the Future of Tobacco Control. 研讨会介绍:烟草控制法案的十年:进展、挫折和烟草控制的未来。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1867474
D Douglas Blanke
{"title":"Symposium Introduction: A Decade of the Tobacco Control Act: Progress, Setbacks, and the Future of Tobacco Control.","authors":"D Douglas Blanke","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1867474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1867474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The landmark symposium, A Decade of the Tobacco Control Act: Progress, Setbacks, and the Future of Tobacco Control, organized by the Public Health Law Center and held in conjunction with the 2019 National Conference on Tobacco or Health, assessed the first 10 years of federal tobacco regulation. In this introduction to the symposium, the Public Health Law Center's executive director provides the context for insights by prominent experts from government, health organizations, and academia, acknowledging the mixed record of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation to date and suggesting that the agency's ultimate success or failure will be determined by the answers to three fundamental, but still unresolved, questions: What is the true goal of federal regulation? How boldly or cautiously will the FDA approach that goal? And who will the agency serve? The answers to those questions, he argues, will determine the prospects for progress in controlling the nation's leading cause of preventable death.</p>","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"285-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1867474","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thinking Outside the Silos: Information Sharing in Medical-Legal Partnerships. 跳出竖井思考:医疗-法律伙伴关系中的信息共享。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1854135
Jessica Mantel, Leah Fowler
{"title":"Thinking Outside the Silos: Information Sharing in Medical-Legal Partnerships.","authors":"Jessica Mantel,&nbsp;Leah Fowler","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1854135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1854135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) allow providers to address patients' health-harming legal needs through partnerships with lawyers. MLPs are most successful in addressing the complex needs of vulnerable populations when clinicians, social workers, and other care team members regularly communicate with the MLP lawyer. Privacy laws and professional rules of conduct governing patient/client confidentiality, however, potentially hinder this exchange of patient-client information. MLP attorneys may be reluctant to share relevant information about a client with the medical partner for fear that doing so would breach client confidentiality or result in an ill-advised waiver of attorney-client privilege. Similarly, privacy concerns may lead providers to limit MLP attorneys' access to patients' medical information.Drawing on the real-world experiences of MLP professionals, this article explores whether legal and ethical obligations impede the sharing of patient-client information between MLPs' medical and legal partners. Our research indicates that at present patient/client confidentiality rules generally do not pose a significant barrier to doing so. However, current legal and professional standards may frustrate emerging advanced care coordination models that pair MLPs with care teams that comprehensively address a broad range of social, economic, and behavioral health needs. We therefore recommend continued monitoring and discussion of the issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"369-389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1854135","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Next 10 Years of Federal Tobacco Regulation: A Road Map to Protect Public Health and Advance Health Equity. 未来十年的联邦烟草管制:保护公众健康和促进健康公平的路线图。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1868941
Joelle M Lester
{"title":"The Next 10 Years of Federal Tobacco Regulation: A Road Map to Protect Public Health and Advance Health Equity.","authors":"Joelle M Lester","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1868941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a decade of fits and starts in regulating commercial tobacco products, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has built the infrastructure needed for robust tobacco product regulation. This article lays out a vision for the FDA in its second decade of tobacco product regulation. To realize the promise of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, the FDA must move quickly to adopt high-impact tobacco product regulation, define and operationalize the public health standard in a way that advances health equity, and bring all of its authority and resources to bear to reduce health disparities. In addition, the agency must engage more productively with states to reduce and eliminate tobacco use.</p>","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"355-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868941","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
2019-2020 Southern Illinois University National Health Law Moot Court Competition. 2019-2020年南伊利诺伊大学国家卫生法模拟法庭竞赛。
IF 0.4
The Journal of legal medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2020.1868944
Richard Ausness
{"title":"2019-2020 Southern Illinois University National Health Law Moot Court Competition.","authors":"Richard Ausness","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1868944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868944","url":null,"abstract":"Memorandum Opinion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .448 Blackstone, District Judge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 Factual and Procedural History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .448 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .451 I. Nonjusticiable Political Question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451 II. Public Nuisance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 A. Interference with a Right Common to the Public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .455 B. Unreasonable Interference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .456 C. Control Over the Instrumentality That Caused the Harm . . . . . . . . . . . . .457 Conclusion and Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .458 I. Nonjusticiable Political Question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459 II. Public Nuisance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459 I. Nonjusticiable Political Question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460 II. Public Nuisance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462 A. Right Common to the Public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .463 B. Unreasonable Interference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .463 C. Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .463","PeriodicalId":520806,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of legal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"447-465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1868944","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25541399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信