The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Books: The Golden Rule: Lessons in Living from a Doctor of Ageing. 书籍:《黄金法则:老年医生的生活经验》。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp26X746265
Frances da Cunha
{"title":"Books: The Golden Rule: Lessons in Living from a Doctor of Ageing.","authors":"Frances da Cunha","doi":"10.3399/bjgp26X746265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp26X746265","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"76 769","pages":"368-369"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148633579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
So much universe, and so little time. 宇宙如此浩瀚,时间却如此短暂。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp26X746169
Andrew Papanikitas
{"title":"So much universe, and so little time.","authors":"Andrew Papanikitas","doi":"10.3399/bjgp26X746169","DOIUrl":"10.3399/bjgp26X746169","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"76 769","pages":"360"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531485/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148633583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management and long-term serum urate control in gout: a population-based primary care cohort study. 早期开始降尿酸治疗可改善血清尿酸控制:来自大型国家初级保健队列的结果。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2025.0788
Maria Antonia Pou, Carlen Reyes, Daniel Martinez-Laguna, Pau Satorra, Cristian Tebe, Nicola Dalbeth, Cesar Diaz-Torne
{"title":"Management and long-term serum urate control in gout: a population-based primary care cohort study.","authors":"Maria Antonia Pou, Carlen Reyes, Daniel Martinez-Laguna, Pau Satorra, Cristian Tebe, Nicola Dalbeth, Cesar Diaz-Torne","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0788","DOIUrl":"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0788","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gout is a prevalent chronic inflammatory disease associated with a substantial clinical and cardiovascular burden. Despite the availability of effective urate-lowering therapies (ULTs), gout management remains suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe clinical characteristics and treatment patterns, and to identify factors associated with long-term serum urate (SU) control in gout.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective population-based cohort study using the primary care research database 'Sistema d'Informació per al Desenvolupament de la Investigació en Atenció Primària' (SIDIAP), covering >75% of the Catalan population within a universal healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals with incident gout diagnosed between 2012 and 2023 were included. Demographic, clinical, and ULT data were collected. Good SU control was defined as SU levels <6 mg/dL for ≥80% of follow-up time. Factors associated with SU control were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 94 759 patients were included (mean age 66.25 [standard deviation 14.64] years; 79.58% male [75 412/94 759]; median follow-up 5.44 [interquartile range 2.54-8.24] years). In the 94 759 patients, hypertension (65.15%, <i>n</i> = 61 732), dyslipidaemia (50.58%, <i>n</i> = 47 932), diabetes (24.19%, <i>n</i> = 22 919), and chronic kidney disease (32.80%, 27 013/82 270 ) were common. Of the patients, 88.95% (<i>n</i> = 84 288) had ≥1 SU measurement. In total, 37.30% (35 343/94 759) had never received ULT. Allopurinol was the initial therapy in 96.09% of treated patients. Only 12.40% (10 453/84 288) achieved good SU control, with no improvement over time. Short ULT duration (≤25 days) occurred in 15.92% (9459/59 416) of patients. Good control was associated with longer treatment duration, higher allopurinol doses, febuxostat use, and better adherence, whereas delayed ULT initiation, male sex, obesity, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension were associated with poor control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term SU control in gout remains poor in primary care. Early initiation of ULT, appropriate dose optimisation, and improved adherence represent key modifiable targets to improve gout management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"e624-e633"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148166840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medicines as infrastructure. 药品是基础设施。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp26X746109
Nada Khan
{"title":"Medicines as infrastructure.","authors":"Nada Khan","doi":"10.3399/bjgp26X746109","DOIUrl":"10.3399/bjgp26X746109","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"76 769","pages":"339"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531544/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148633572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrections. 修正。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp26X745941
{"title":"Corrections.","authors":"","doi":"10.3399/bjgp26X745941","DOIUrl":"10.3399/bjgp26X745941","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"76 769","pages":"348"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531484/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148633591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidence-based blood tests for monitoring adults with hypertension in primary care: rapid review, routine data analyses, and consensus study. 在初级保健中监测成人高血压的循证血液检测:快速回顾、常规数据分析和共识研究
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2025.0209
Martha M C Elwenspoek, Rachel O'Donnell, Catalina Lopez Manzano, Sarah Dawson, Lewis F Buss, Katie Charlwood, Christina Stokes, Francesco Palma, Alastair D Hay, Penny F Whiting, Jessica Watson
{"title":"Evidence-based blood tests for monitoring adults with hypertension in primary care: rapid review, routine data analyses, and consensus study.","authors":"Martha M C Elwenspoek, Rachel O'Donnell, Catalina Lopez Manzano, Sarah Dawson, Lewis F Buss, Katie Charlwood, Christina Stokes, Francesco Palma, Alastair D Hay, Penny F Whiting, Jessica Watson","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0209","DOIUrl":"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substantial variation in testing rates in adults with hypertension across UK primary care suggest that patients are not receiving optimal monitoring.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a minimal set of evidence-based blood tests for adults with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This was a rapid review, routine data analyses, and consensus study. It was set in primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study examined the rationale and evidence for tests recommended by guidelines or used commonly in adults with hypertension using stepwise rapid evidence reviews. A consensus group, including clinicians and patients, voted to include or exclude each test in the testing panel based on the evidence. If there was no consensus (>80%), additional evidence was sought through rapid reviews or analyses of primary care records, which was subject to further voting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen routinely ordered tests were identified. The study found consistent, good evidence that estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to detect chronic kidney disease and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) to detect diabetes is beneficial for patients. The study found no or inconsistent evidence of the benefit of routinely measuring lipids, electrolytes, haemoglobin, thyroid function, clotting biomarkers, calcium, ferritin, folate acid, or vitamin B12. Good evidence was found that there is no benefit in routinely monitoring liver function, inflammation markers, or brain natriuretic peptide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A minimal set of evidence-based blood tests to monitor adults with hypertension was identified. This panel includes eGFR, HbA1c, potassium, and sodium. Implementing these recommendations could reduce harms associated with unwarranted variation in care. Further research is needed to clarify the role of tests with inconsistent evidence and determine the optimal frequency of testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"e663-e672"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531578/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of treatment duration on the effectiveness of opioid analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 治疗时间对阿片类镇痛效果的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2025.0705
Liesbeth S Froentjes, Catherine Am Barrington, Rodger A Craig, Mareiz Morcos, Dawn M Wedman, Christina S Korowynk, Michael D Kelmer, Farah N Campbell, Scott R Garrison
{"title":"Impact of treatment duration on the effectiveness of opioid analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Liesbeth S Froentjes, Catherine Am Barrington, Rodger A Craig, Mareiz Morcos, Dawn M Wedman, Christina S Korowynk, Michael D Kelmer, Farah N Campbell, Scott R Garrison","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0705","DOIUrl":"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0705","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use can heighten pain perception over time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether the effectiveness of opioid analgesia diminishes with treatment duration in those with chronic low back pain or osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Systematic review of randomised trials comparing opioids with placebo/opioid-minimised pain management strategies in those with chronic low back pain or osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A random-effects meta-analysis using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases was undertaken in January 2025. The primary outcome was attainment of clinically important pain relief ('moderate' or ≥30% improvement). The secondary outcome was on-treatment pain (100-point scale). The primary analysis was difference in primary/secondary outcomes across short-term (≤4 weeks), intermediate-term (4-12 weeks), and long-term (≥12 weeks) duration subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 27 trials were eligible for inclusion. Clinically important pain relief differed significantly between short-, intermediate-, and long-term treatment durations (<i>P</i> = 0.05). Opioid recipients were more likely to be responders in short-term trials (eight trials, risk ratio [RR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 1.89, moderate-certainty evidence), but not in intermediate-term trials (three trials, RR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.30, low-certainty evidence), or long-term trials (nine trials, RR 0.91, 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.14, moderate-certainty evidence), which trended in favour of controls. The mean difference in pain scores failed to reach this review's definition of clinical significance (≥10 points) for any timepoint, but was statistically significant in the short and intermediate term.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although opioids likely provide meaningful pain relief over short durations (≤4 weeks), they appear to provide little or no benefit beyond placebo over longer periods, and may worsen pain control beyond 12 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"e634-e643"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531503/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147848217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Books: Immune health: a Myth-Busting guide. 书籍:免疫健康:打破神话指南。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp26X746289
Andrew Papanikitas
{"title":"Books: Immune health: a Myth-Busting guide.","authors":"Andrew Papanikitas","doi":"10.3399/bjgp26X746289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp26X746289","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"76 769","pages":"371"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148633585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exhibition. 展览。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp26X746253
Hector Watson, Elizabeth Walton
{"title":"Exhibition.","authors":"Hector Watson, Elizabeth Walton","doi":"10.3399/bjgp26X746253","DOIUrl":"10.3399/bjgp26X746253","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"76 769","pages":"366-367"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148633574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Structured medication reviews: prescribing change is not the same as medicines optimisation. 结构化药物审查:改变处方并不等同于药物优化。
IF 5.2
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp26X746121
Kinan Mokbel
{"title":"Structured medication reviews: prescribing change is not the same as medicines optimisation.","authors":"Kinan Mokbel","doi":"10.3399/bjgp26X746121","DOIUrl":"10.3399/bjgp26X746121","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"76 769","pages":"346"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531498/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148633589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书