International Data Privacy Law最新文献_第3页

Confidentiality of health data in contact tracing systems during the Covid-19 pandemic in France 法国Covid-19大流行期间接触者追踪系统中卫生数据的保密性

4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipad004

Antoine Bérar, Renaud Bouvet

引用次数: 0

Unpacking data: China’s ‘bundle of rights’ approach to the commercialization of data 拆解数据:中国数据商业化的“权利捆绑”方式

4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipad003

Bingwan Xiong, Jiangqiu Ge, Li Chen

{"title":"Unpacking data: China’s ‘bundle of rights’ approach to the commercialization of data","authors":"Bingwan Xiong, Jiangqiu Ge, Li Chen","doi":"10.1093/idpl/ipad003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipad003","url":null,"abstract":"The scarcity and economic value of data have been widely recognized in the literature on economics1 and law,2 earning it the title of being ‘the most valuable resource’ in the world today, according to a cover article in The Economist.3 In China, where the digital economy has developed rapidly, ‘data’ was recently recognized by its national macro policy as a new crucial factor of production alongside land, capital, knowledge, technology, and labour.4 Accordingly, the key question is how the rights to this resource should be characterized and allocated in order to facilitate the efficient flow and use of data and promote the development of the overall digital economy. There is currently no unified regulatory approach adopted across jurisdictions.5 Despite extensive debate among legal scholars, no consensus has been reached on how the law should protect and utilize data resources.6 On the one hand, some argue that the law should not accord property rights over data given that data is intangible,7 which risks giving rise to a multiplicity of stakeholders and competing claims.8 They argue that data law should instead focus on the acts of accessing and using data, such as through defining and regulating the improper crawling of data.9 On the other hand, others argue that the law should create data property rights, and have proposed different models of property rights, including the classic ownership-usufruct (所有权-用益) approach,10 the intellectual property model,11 and a novel property rights model tailored specifically for data.","PeriodicalId":51749,"journal":{"name":"International Data Privacy Law","volume":"516 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135340245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Implementing a new data protection law: lessons from the Turkish experience 实施新的数据保护法:土耳其的经验教训

IF 2.1 4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipad001

Batu Kinikoglu

引用次数: 0

Protection of genomic data and the Australian Privacy Act: when are genomic data ‘personal information’? 基因组数据保护与澳大利亚隐私法:何时基因组数据是“个人信息”?

IF 2.1 4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipad002

M. Paltiel, M. Taylor, A. Newson

引用次数: 2

A pragmatic compromise? The role of Article 88 GDPR in upholding privacy in the workplace 务实的妥协?GDPR第88条在维护工作场所隐私方面的作用

IF 2.1 4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2022-08-16 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipac015

Halefom H. Abraha

引用次数: 2

On proportionality in the data protection jurisprudence of the CJEU 论欧洲法院数据保护法理中的比例性

IF 2.1 4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipac014

Lorenzo Dalla Corte

引用次数: 2

From knowing by name to targeting: the meaning of identification under the GDPR 从名字认识到定位:GDPR下的身份识别含义

IF 2.1 4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipac013

Nadezhda Purtova

引用次数: 6

Correction to: Revisiting the definition of health data in the age of digitalized health care 更正:重新审视数字化医疗时代卫生数据的定义

IF 2.1 4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2022-04-20 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipac010

引用次数: 0

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Data protection in the judiciary in EU and EEA Member States 什么是客户管理?欧盟和欧洲经济区成员国的司法数据保护

IF 2.1 4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2022-01-20 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipac002

Custers B, Louis L, Spinelli M, et al.

{"title":"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Data protection in the judiciary in EU and EEA Member States","authors":"Custers B, Louis L, Spinelli M, et al.","doi":"10.1093/idpl/ipac002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipac002","url":null,"abstract":"<span><div>Key Points<ul><li>Compliance with data protection legislation shall be subject to control by an independent authority, also for the judiciary. However, in order to safeguard the independence of the judiciary, both the General Data Protection Regulation and the Law Enforcement Directive explicitly state that national Data Protection Authorities are not competent to supervise courts ‘when acting in their judicial capacity’.</li><li>In this article, the notion of ‘courts acting in their judicial capacities’ is analysed to determine whether any common understanding of this notion exists. Apart from legal analysis, empirical research (survey and interviews) was carried out in 30 countries (27 EU and 3 EFTA EEA Member States).</li><li>The concept of ‘courts acting in their judicial capacity’ can be contrasted with ‘courts not acting in their judicial capacity’ (the functional interpretation) or with ‘other organizations’ (the institutional interpretation).</li><li>The functional interpretation is followed by most countries and in fairly similar ways. The institutional interpretation is followed by some countries, but in very different ways and some practices raise concerns, such as limited or no supervision for the judiciary (interfering with Article 8 of the Charter) and supervision of the judiciary by the ministry of justice (potentially interfering with the separation of powers according to the <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">trias politica</span>).</li><li>Altogether, there is to a large extent a common understanding of the notion of ‘courts acting in their judicial capacity’ and this is the functional interpretation. The institutional interpretation, however, may lead to a gap in data protection supervision of the judiciary.</li></ul></div></span>","PeriodicalId":51749,"journal":{"name":"International Data Privacy Law","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138492558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 2.1 4区社会学

International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipac008

引用次数: 6