Ben Wolden, Mitch Wolden, Jennifer Furze, Amy McDevitt
{"title":"Advancing Consistency in Education: A Reliability Analysis of the Clinical Reasoning Assessment Tool.","authors":"Ben Wolden, Mitch Wolden, Jennifer Furze, Amy McDevitt","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical reasoning (CR) is a fundamental component of physical therapist practice in health care. The Clinical Reasoning Assessment Tool (CRAT) was developed to assess CR in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) and residency education. However, the reliability of the CRAT has not been investigated. Our purpose was to investigate the interrater and intrarater reliability of the CRAT.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>A range of assessment methods are available to assess CR, including didactic-based, simulation learning, and clinic-based assessments. The CRAT is designed to assess CR across learning environments. The CRAT assesses CR across 3 domains: (1) content knowledge, (2) procedural knowledge/psychomotor skills, and (3) conceptual reasoning.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Twenty-two faculty participated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed an electronic survey at 2 timepoints (T1, T2) that included training on use of the CRAT and 2 case videos of DPT students at different performance levels managing a standardized patient. Participants rated student performance with the CRAT for both case videos (T1) and repeated the sequence at least 30 days later (T2). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and 95% confidence intervals were used to determine the interrater and intrarater reliability for each domain of the CRAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Video 1 was consistently rated higher for each CRAT domain (T1: 7.32-8.05; T2: 8.05-8.15) compared to video 2 (T1: 2.91-3.68; T2: 3.00-3.68). There were inverse relationships between CRAT ratings and number of years in DPT education, at an institution, and as a licensed physical therapist. At both timepoints, the interrater reliability for each domain was good to excellent (ICCs 0.60-0.79). The intrarater reliability was fair to excellent for all domains for each video (ICCs 0.45-0.75).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The CRAT is a reliable instrument for assessing DPT student CR during a simulated patient encounter. Implementation of the CRAT in DPT education may facilitate improved consistency of CR assessment across the learner continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Using Structural Competencies for Faculty and Students to Integrate Principles of Social Justice and Health Equity Into a Doctor of Physical Therapy Program.","authors":"Keshrie Naidoo, Rania Karim, Lauren Rimmel, Callie Watkins Liu, Kamaria Washington, Rachel Privett, Keelin Godsey, Valerie Rucker-Bussie, Laura Plummer","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Integrating principles of social justice and health equity (SJHE) into Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education may be one way to confront the root causes of health inequity. The purpose of this method/model presentation is to highlight structural competencies for faculty and students to integrate SJHE into a 3-year DPT program and a professional development program designed to provide core and clinical faculty with the tools to engage in critical discussions with students and support their development as agents of change.</p><p><strong>Method/model description and evaluation: </strong>This presentation highlights how SJHE structural competencies can be integrated into existing course content (as opposed to presented as a standalone course). Researchers interviewed 10 DPT faculty and 10 DPT students about their experience learning about SJHE. Six clinical instructors (CIs) who supervised students during a full-time clinical education experience (CEE) discussed students' ability to apply SJHE concepts during CEEs.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Faculty expressed the need for practice in low-stakes settings such as through simulation. Students valued learning about SJHE over 3 years with the opportunity to integrate content during CEEs but felt that SJHE could be better integrated in classroom content. Some peers were perceived to be resistant to SJHE. Clinical instructors described that although students were prepared to apply foundational SJHE concepts, students were surprised by the complexity of patient need.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Exploratory analysis of faculty, CI, and students' perceptions confirm that SJHE is needed in DPT education but takes time to integrate well with a steep learning curve and additional faculty development needs that must be met.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gregory F Spadoni, Sarah Wojkowski, Jenna Smith-Turchyn, Paul W Stratford, Lawrence Grierson
{"title":"Predictors of Success in a Graduate, Entry-Level Professional Program: From Admissions to Graduation.","authors":"Gregory F Spadoni, Sarah Wojkowski, Jenna Smith-Turchyn, Paul W Stratford, Lawrence Grierson","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000364","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Admission to health professional programs (HPPs) in Canada is competitive. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how factors identifiable by the admissions package may predict incidences of academic concerns in one physiotherapy program in Canada.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Previous literature has identified many concepts that contribute to \"academic success.\" Some HPPs have investigated if admissions criteria can predict students' academic performance. However, this has not been reported in physiotherapy programs in Canada.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Study data included candidates' admissions' metrics and physiotherapy students' program data for 4 graduating cohorts, who were admitted from 2016 to 2019 inclusive (N = 256).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, nonconcurrent cohort study was used to estimate the relationship between applicant's admissions data and students' program data pertaining to academic success. Data were summarized as frequencies for categorical variables and means for continuous variables. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and probabilities of an academic or professional concern for standard scores. Significance was set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cohorts participating in the multiple mini-interview (MMI) had an academic concern incidence of 14/131. The virtual MMI (VMMI) cohort had an incidence of 7/125. Students with higher MMI scores were less likely to have an academic concern (OR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.30-0.89, P = .017]). Grade point average was not significantly associated with an academic concern when combined with either MMI or VMMI (Ps > 0.05). Admissions round offer was also significantly associated with an academic concern (OR = 2.48 [95% CI: 1.00-6.12, P = .049]), with those beyond the initial round of offers having increased risk of concerns.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Results of the study reflect the generally low event rates for incidences of academic concerns and the relative homogeneity and range restriction of independent variables across the 4 cohorts of students. HPP's reflection on current admissions processes and ability to identify opportunities for change in admission processes helps ensure that programs are selecting candidates who are likely to succeed.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}