Learned Publishing最新文献

{"title":"Is AI giving us more than we can or even should handle?","authors":"Pascal Hetzscholdt","doi":"10.1002/leap.1593","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1593","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 </p><ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Artificial intelligence (AI)'s dual functionalities in scholarly publishing raise ethical and practical concerns.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Chatbots, much more than AI-driven search engines, have the potential to distort information and disseminate false truths and flawed science.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The role of AI in scholarly publishing needs to be critically examined.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 1","pages":"63-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1593","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139525397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The robot uprising is here: Is scholarly publishing ready?","authors":"Sami Benchekroun","doi":"10.1002/leap.1595","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1595","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 </p><ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Research integrity is impossible to achieve without digital innovation.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Humans and machines have complementary strengths, which we should harness for collaboration.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>We have backed ourselves into a corner with the way we have built current publishing infrastructure.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Today's research integrity solutions are downstream, but innovation requires integration throughout publishing infrastructure.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 1","pages":"66-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1595","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139616673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Adapting peer review for the future: Digital disruptions and trust in peer review","authors":"Harini Calamur,&nbsp;Roohi Ghosh","doi":"10.1002/leap.1594","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1594","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 </p><ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Academia is undergoing transformation with rapid technological advancements, global collaboration, and the rise of AI.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Maintaining research integrity is paramount in the face of new challenges and opportunities.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The peer review process, vital for research integrity, is strained due to the high volume of academic papers.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Cactus Communication's (CACTUS) global survey during Peer Review Week 2022 gathered insights from 685 participants on research integrity and peer review.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Survey participants emphasized the importance of peer review in detecting various issues, including plagiarism and questionable research practices.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Actions taken in response to integrity concerns varied, with some participants seeking guidance from colleagues or informing journal editors.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Digital innovations, especially AI-driven tools, promise to revolutionize peer review processes, from manuscript screening to reviewer selection and evaluation.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>AI tools like Chat GPT can aid authors in improving writing quality and assist reviewers in generating detailed feedback.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Concerns about data privacy and the need for a balance between human expertise and AI assistance are raised in the context of peer review.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>AI plagiarism detection tool scan complement human efforts, providing an additional layer of scrutiny.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Increased digital innovation allows for flexible review formats, international collaboration, and heightened transparency in the review process.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The integration of AI into peer review holds the potential to enhance efficiency and objectivity but raises concerns about bias and transparency.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Guidelines, bias mitigation measures, accountability mechanisms, and ongoing training are essential for the responsible use of AI in peer review.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Encouraging peer review systems to embrace innovation and ethical AI is crucial for adapting to changing dynamics while upholding core principles of research integrity.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 1","pages":"49-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1594","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139529629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Editorial actions taken to reduce publishing references from predatory sources: A case study","authors":"Joan E. Dodgson,&nbsp;Ethan T. Bamberger,&nbsp;Zelalem T. Haile,&nbsp;Mary Kate J. Kornegay","doi":"10.1002/leap.1592","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1592","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 </p><ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Our policy and implementation successfully identified references from predatory publishers, which authors without hesitation agreed to remove before publication.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Higher predatory reference patterns emerged among authors in low-income countries, those with non-English primary languages, and sole authorship.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>After a year of implementing our policy, the editors changed our policy and workflow to better handle references from predatory publishers cited in literature reviews and meta-analyses.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Editorial responsibility is discussed, particularly concerning support for authors from lower- and middle-income countries.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 1","pages":"30-38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1592","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139533159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Breaking free from academic scams: Five key reflections on the cloned journal conundrum","authors":"Rajadurai Vijay Solomon","doi":"10.1002/leap.1590","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1590","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 </p><ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Emerging as a novel cybercrime, cloned (or hijacked) journals with identical ISSNs to legitimate ones have surfaced.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>These cloned journals employ various tactics, and this article identifies and discusses the top five.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Fraudulent journals primarily focus on print-only publications, using parallel websites to mislead researchers.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Cloned journals are using videos on their homepages to deceitfully showcase indexing in databases like Scopus or Web of Science.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 1","pages":"44-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1590","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139153765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"How do editors use editorials to lead their journals? Insights from the field of human resource management","authors":"Maria S. Plakhotnik","doi":"10.1002/leap.1591","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1591","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Editorials have earned a special place among many practices, tools, and policies available to editors for journal advancement. Despite the vital and diverse roles of editorials in academic journals, they have rarely been systematically analysed for common characteristics or patterns. In this study, I approached editorials as a leadership practice of journal editors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand how editors use editorials to lead their journals. To render a manageable set of editorials and, at the same time, to capture the latest trends, I focused on editorials published in 2022 in top journals in the field of organizational behaviour/human resource management indexed by Scopus. The sample consisted of 120 editorials found in 103 journals managed by 21 publishers. I analysed the editorials using qualitative content analysis that was guided by two research questions: (1) How commonly do editors use editorials? (2) What objectives do editors pursue in their editorials? The analyses showed that editorials appear to be neither a regular nor a common practice. An overwhelming majority of editorials were written to validate existing knowledge. The findings raise several important issues, including an unclear contribution of editorials, perceived or factual, to academic journals and the editor's role in the journal development process. Journal editors, editorial board members, publishers, universities, and organizations associated with journals should consider revisiting their policies and practices to ensure a purposeful, meaningful, and systematic use of editorials.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 2","pages":"89-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139155548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Academic misconduct, fake authorship letters, cyber fraud: Evidence from the International Political Science Review","authors":"Daniel Stockemer,&nbsp;Theresa Reidy","doi":"10.1002/leap.1587","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1587","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 1","pages":"39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1587","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138956058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science","authors":"Aron Laxdal,&nbsp;Tommy Haugen","doi":"10.1002/leap.1589","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1589","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 </p><ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>While it is unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 2","pages":"154-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138980123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alternatives to English only in scholarly publishing: Emerging trends of language policies among non-Anglophone journals?","authors":"Xiangdong Li","doi":"10.1002/leap.1588","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1588","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 </p><ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Publish in English or perish is becoming a reality in many non-Anglophone countries.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Non-Anglophone journals are facing a dilemma: losing appeal to authors/reviewers if published in local languages or losing linguistic/cultural identity if published in English.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>This article analyses language policies those journals may use and positions them on a capital-identity matrix to highlight their advantages and disadvantages.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The article elaborates on two emerging language policies (bilingual publishing and extended English summary), both helping preserve their identity and take advantage of the capital of the English language.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The article provides insights into the pros and cons of different language policies and how to select policies that best support journal survival and development.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 2","pages":"130-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138588101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Establishing an early indicator for data sharing and reuse","authors":"Agata Piękniewska,&nbsp;Laurel L. Haak,&nbsp;Darla Henderson,&nbsp;Katherine McNeill,&nbsp;Anita Bandrowski,&nbsp;Yvette Seger","doi":"10.1002/leap.1586","DOIUrl":"10.1002/leap.1586","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Funders, publishers, scholarly societies, universities, and other stakeholders need to be able to track the impact of programs and policies designed to advance data sharing and reuse. With the launch of the NIH data management and sharing policy in 2023, establishing a pre-policy baseline of sharing and reuse activity is critical for the biological and biomedical community. Toward this goal, we tested the utility of mentions of research resources, databases, and repositories (RDRs) as a proxy measurement of data sharing and reuse. We captured and processed text from Methods sections of open access biological and biomedical research articles published in 2020 and 2021 and made available in PubMed Central. We used natural language processing to identify text strings to measure RDR mentions. In this article, we demonstrate our methodology, provide normalized baseline data sharing and reuse activity in this community, and highlight actions authors and publishers can take to encourage data sharing and reuse practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1586","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134901707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}