Technology Innovation Management Review最新文献_第8页

What are the Challenges of Building a Smart City? 智慧城市建设面临哪些挑战?

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1388

Haven Allahar

引用次数: 11

Editorial: Innovating in Times of Crisis 社论：危机时刻的创新

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1390

S. Tanev, G. Sandstrom

引用次数: 1

An Empirical Study into the Individual-Level Antecedents to Employee-Driven Innovation 员工驱动创新的个体层面先决条件实证研究

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1367

Chukwuemeka K. Echebiri

引用次数: 6

A Two-Staged Approach to Technology Entrepreneurship: Differential Effects of Intellectual Property Rights 技术创业的两阶段方法:知识产权的差异效应

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1364

Saurav Pathak, Etayankara Muralidharan

{"title":"A Two-Staged Approach to Technology Entrepreneurship: Differential Effects of Intellectual Property Rights","authors":"Saurav Pathak, Etayankara Muralidharan","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1364","url":null,"abstract":"In this article we examine how the strength of the intellectual property rights (IPR) regime drives technology entrepreneurship innovation (TEI). The latter is comprised of novel unfamiliar technological products and new business models, which in turn lead to new product-market combinations. We consider TEI to be a two-stage process that involves access to and use of new technologies and technological resources by entrepreneurs. While stronger IPR may constrain easy availability of new technologies and technological resources for entrepreneurs, using technology itself helps lead to TEI. We suggest that stronger IPR regimes could lead to TEI. The positive effect of TEI is felt through easier accessibility to the latest technologies and technology resources by entrepreneurs. Our model contributes to understanding the effect of strong IPR regimes on different stages of the innovation process. Intellectual-property rules are clearly necessary to spur innovation: if every invention could be stolen, or every new drug immediately copied, few people would invest in innovation. But too much protection can strangle competition and can limit what economists call 'incremental innovation' innovations that build, in some way, on others.","PeriodicalId":51569,"journal":{"name":"Technology Innovation Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43015977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Technology Adaptation and Survival of SMEs: A Longitudinal Study of Developing Countries 中小企业技术适应与生存:发展中国家的纵向研究

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1369

S. Das, A. Kundu, Arabinda Bhattacharya

引用次数: 30

Fundraising Campaigns in a Digital Economy: Lessons from a Swiss Synthetic Diamond Venture's Initial Coin Offering (ICO) 数字经济中的筹款活动:瑞士合成钻石企业首次代币发行(ICO)的经验教训

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1368

Jahja Rrustemi, Nils S. Tuchschmid

引用次数: 8

What Makes Value Propositions Distinct and Valuable to New Companies Committed to Scale Rapidly? 是什么让价值主张与众不同，对致力于快速扩张的新公司有价值？

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1365

Tony Bailetti, S. Tanev, C. Keen

{"title":"What Makes Value Propositions Distinct and Valuable to New Companies Committed to Scale Rapidly?","authors":"Tony Bailetti, S. Tanev, C. Keen","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1365","url":null,"abstract":"One of the most valuable resources a company owns is the “portfolio of value propositions” to its diverse external stakeholders, such as customers, investors, and resource owners. In this article, we fill a gap in the value proposition literature by identifying features that make the value propositions of new companies different from other resources, along with factors that make them valuable. A value proposition is conceived as being what enables and improves business transactions between a new company and external stakeholders. We reason that two features in particular make value propositions of new companies distinct: (1) business transactions between a new company and one or more external stakeholders, and (2) investments to create and improve a new company's value propositions that enable business transactions. We provide a definition of “value proposition” and postulate that a value proposition will benefit a new company when it: (1) strengthens the new company's capabilities to scale; (2) increases demand for the new company's products and services; and (3) increases the number, diversity, and rapidity of external investments in the new company's value proposition portfolio.","PeriodicalId":51569,"journal":{"name":"Technology Innovation Management Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"14-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44818331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14

Is Porter's Five Forces Framework Still Relevant? A study of the capital/labour intensity continuum via mining and IT industries 波特的五力框架仍然适用吗?通过采矿业和信息技术产业对资本/劳动强度连续体的研究

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1366

Diane A. Isabelle, Kevin Horak, Sarah McKinnon, C. Palumbo

{"title":"Is Porter's Five Forces Framework Still Relevant? A study of the capital/labour intensity continuum via mining and IT industries","authors":"Diane A. Isabelle, Kevin Horak, Sarah McKinnon, C. Palumbo","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1366","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1366","url":null,"abstract":"Porter's Five Forces (P5F) framework, published in 1979, helps us to understand the attractiveness of an industry. The five competitive forces are: the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of substitute products of services, and the rivalry among existing competitors. This framework has recently come under scrutiny and been called into question. To contribute to the debate, this paper investigates the relevance of Porter's framework by contrasting vastly different industries. The use cases consist of a resource-based, capital-intensive industry, the mining industry, and a knowledge-based, labor-intensive industry, the information technology industry. Drawing from research on Porter's Five Forces framework, and through an internationalization lens, the paper proposes a modified framework augmented with four additional forces. These additional forces are: the competitor's level of innovativeness, exposure to globalization, threat of digitalization, and industry exposure to de/regulation activities. These forces were added to capture the increased interconnectivity and complexity of businesses operating in the 21st century. The paper contributes to this body of knowledge by augmenting a popular framework and applying it to vital industrial sectors. The findings aim to incite researchers, managers, entrepreneurs and policymakers to go beyond the traditional five forces as a way to help monitor their business environment and enhance decision-making processes, particularly in a post-COVID-19 world.","PeriodicalId":51569,"journal":{"name":"Technology Innovation Management Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"28-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48794161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 27

Citizen Perceptions of Government’s Resistance to Shared Parking 公民对政府抵制共享停车的看法

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-05-31 DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1354

M. Westerlund

{"title":"Citizen Perceptions of Government’s Resistance to Shared Parking","authors":"M. Westerlund","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1354","url":null,"abstract":"2017). On the other hand, even strict regulations can contribute positively to the supply of sharing economy services by making it Sharing economy services is one of the fastest growing segments in today’s economy, especially in urban centres. However, some cities have taken a negative stance and sought to prohibit sharing economy services, which has raised tensions between citizens and the local government. This paper adopts a case study approach to investigate what the main topics are in citizen perceptions of their government’s resistance to shared parking in Ottawa, the capital city of Canada, where shared parking is considered illegal. In so doing, the study applies topic modelling on readers’ comments following news about local residents being threatened with legal action by the city for providing shared parking services to government employees suffering from insufficient office parking resources. Based on six identified topics, the study establishes a conceptual framework that contributes to the literature on sharing economies by illustrating how citizens perceive their government’s resistance toward sharing economies. The paper considers whether sharing economy services could be an innovation that would benefit societies, and how understanding citizen perceptions through online comments can help a government to solve policy issues and create win-win resolutions. Citation: Citizen Perceptions of Government’s Resistance to Shared Parking. Technology Innovation Management , 10(5):","PeriodicalId":51569,"journal":{"name":"Technology Innovation Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41821705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

More for Less? Sharing Economy as a Driver of Public Welfare Innovation 少花钱多花钱?共享经济作为公益创新的驱动力

IF 1.8

Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-05-31 DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1353

Eva Pallesen, M. Aakjær

引用次数: 2