Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international最新文献

筛选

英文中文

From Fact to Applicable Law: What Role for the International Climate Change Regime in Investor-State Arbitration? 从事实到适用法律：国际气候变化制度在投资者与国家间仲裁中的作用？

Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2024.2

Camille Martini

{"title":"From Fact to Applicable Law: What Role for the International Climate Change Regime in Investor-State Arbitration?","authors":"Camille Martini","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2024.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2024.2","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 While many investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) proceedings based on international investment agreements have dealt, directly or incidentally, with environmental issues, state measures relating to the mitigation and adaptation to climate change have been subject to a small number of reported cases. This article demonstrates that there is a significant gap between the number of investor-state disputes having a direct relevance with climate change, on the one hand, and the number of such cases that have actually raised climate change as a material legal or factual issue. In addition, arbitral tribunals faced with disputes related to measures or sectors that are of direct relevance to climate action have, to date, virtually never engaged in any sort of substantial analysis of international climate change treaties and related instruments, rules, or practices. Against this backdrop, this article will explore ways for arbitrators and parties to ISDS proceedings to better consider the climate regime — in particular, the Paris Agreement and instruments arising therefrom — in ISDS proceedings beyond its current limited role as an element of context. While the literature has mostly focused on integrating climate change concerns in ISDS, this article goes further by exploring how states’ international climate obligations could play a greater role in the adjudication of investor-state disputes, including by providing states with a justification for implementing more ambitious regulations as well as tribunals with guidance for interpreting substantive obligations in investment treaties.","PeriodicalId":512353,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140233977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Légitimités conflictuelles: le droit international humanitaire entre légitimité du statut et légitimité de la cause 相互冲突的合法性：介于地位合法性与事业合法性之间的国际人道主义法

Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2024.1

Rémi Fuhrmann

{"title":"Légitimités conflictuelles: le droit international humanitaire entre légitimité du statut et légitimité de la cause","authors":"Rémi Fuhrmann","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2024.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2024.1","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Le présent article se propose de concevoir l’influence de la notion de légitimité au-delà du rôle lui étant communément attribué en droit international humanitaire (DIH), en s’intéressant particulièrement à la relation entre ce dernier et les causes de la guerre, la nature des acteurs impliqués dans les conflits armés ainsi que les motivations des parties. En remettant notamment en question de l’idée d’une stricte séparation entre jus in bello et jus ad bellum, il est soutenu que les tentatives visant à isoler le DIH de ces questions de légitimité sont à la fois vaines, mais également à rebours de l’évolution et des logiques du régime. Il est en revanche défendu que la notion de légitimité en DIH se manifeste à travers deux modes de légitimation — l’un dérivant du statut, l’autre de la cause — à partir desquels la distribution de droits, devoirs, immunités, privilèges ou encore statuts s’opère et se voit justifiée au sein du régime. Ce faisant, de nombreux discours empruntant au second registre, souvent qualifiés d’aberrations du point de vue du DIH, ou dont la nature juridique est contestée, s’avèrent finalement être des arguments juridiques parfaitement valides et ancrés dans l’évolution et les logiques du DIH.","PeriodicalId":512353,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","volume":"49 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140431491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0