Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons最新文献

{"title":"Low-Velocity Ballistic Trauma-Related Upper Extremity Nerve Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Helene Retrouvey, Cecile Harmange, Moaath Saggaf, Kristen DeSanto, Fraser J Leversedge, Alexander Lauder","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimal management of upper extremity nerve palsy caused by low-velocity ballistic trauma (LBT) remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence on the management of nerve injuries caused by LBT to the upper extremity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was completed for the keywords \"Upper extremity,\" \"Nerve Injury,\" and \"Ballistic.\" 2 independent reviewers conducted a systematic screening of all articles and collected data from relevant publications. The data were summarized and pooled using a random-effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 studies met inclusion criteria. Cohorts between 6 and 168 patients (n = 848) with upper extremity LBT were reported. Neurologic deficits were present in 45% (95% CI: 38 to 52%) of patients at the time of injury evaluation. Nerve exploration was done in 50% (95% CI: 27 to 73%) of these patients with neurologic deficits. Early nerve exploration was done in 19% (95% CI: 9 to 32%) of all patients. Surgical findings included nerve continuity (49%; 95% CI: 14 to 84%), nerve contusion (30%; 95% CI: 12 to 50%), and nerve transection (31%; 95% CI: 14 to 50%). Nerve transection rates found at the time of exploration ranged from 0 to 71% (mean 31%). Outcomes were good in 62% (95% CI: 41 to 81%); however, analyses were limited by subjective outcome reporting of the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to historical teaching that LBT causes neurapraxia, this review identified that 31% of resulting nerve injuries were neurotmesis (transections). These results advocate for systematic clinical follow-up and appropriately timed nerve intervention (within 3 to 6 months of injury) when neurologic deficits persist after ballistic injury.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Predicting Proximal Humerus Fracture Mechanical Complications: Are Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units the Answer?","authors":"Nina D Fisher, Andrew S Bi, Kenneth A Egol","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose was to determine whether computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HU) as a proxy for bone quality can predict postoperative complications following surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six patients with 2-, 3-, or 4-part proximal humerus fractures who underwent surgical fixation at single institution and had complete radiographic data available were included. Radiographic measurements included the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) on preoperative anterior-posterior shoulder radiographs, and the HU value from the surgical proximal humerus was determined by measuring the humeral head at the midaxial/coronal/sagittal CT image using a circle-type region of interest (≥35 mm2). Postoperative complications recorded were implant failure, development of osteonecrosis, nonunion, and acute periprosthetic fracture. Patients with and without complications were statistically compared, and binary logistic regression was performed to determine whether preoperative proximal humerus CT HU were predictive of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients (12.1%) developed 11 overall complications, with three patients experiencing multiple complications each. Complications included osteonecrosis (4), implant failure (5), nonunion (1), and acute periprosthetic fracture (1). No difference was observed in demographics or Neer or AO/OTA classification between those with and without complications. Patients with complications had markedly lower DTI and overall HU as well as HU in the coronal and sagittal planes. Regression analysis for average DTI demonstrated a higher DTI and had a 10 times decreased risk of complication (P = 0.040, odds ratio = -10.5, 95% confidence interval, 0.000 to 0.616). Regression analysis for average total HU also found a higher HU associated with a decreased risk of complications (P = 0.034, odds ratio = -0.020, 95% confidence interval, 0.980 to 0.962). Logistic regression analysis, including age, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, mean DTI, and mean total HU, only found mean total HU to be notable within the model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CT HU may identify patients with poorer bone quality and thus help predict postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ten-Year Trends in Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis at a High-Volume Arthroplasty Center.","authors":"Juan D Lizcano, Matthew B Sherman, Saad Tarabichi, Colin M Baker, Yashas Reddy, Matthew S Austin","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is the standard of care after total joint arthroplasty. However, there have been changes in the prevalence of certain medication classes used by institutions over time driven by the literature and national clinical practice guidelines. The purpose of this study was to analyze the patterns of VTE medications over the past 10 years at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 25,095 patients who underwent a primary total joint arthroplasty between 2012 and 2022. Medications for VTE prophylaxis included aspirin, warfarin, unfractioned heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), factor-Xa inhibitors (FXa), and antiplatelet agents different from aspirin and thrombin inhibitors. Tranexamic acid use was recorded. The rates of symptomatic VTE were calculated and categorized as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Venous thromboembolism rates decreased from 1.1% in 2012 to 0.2% in 2022 and ranged between 0.4% and 1.2% during the ten-year period. Although VTE incidence decreased in the past 4 years, an isolated increase was noted in 2021(1%). In 2012, the use of aspirin, warfarin, FXa, and UFH were 52.1%, 30.7%, 0%, and 16.2%, respectively, whereas in 2022, the rates for the same medications were 83.3%, 0.3%, 10.4%, and 1.8%, respectively. The use of LMWH, thrombin inhibitors, and other antiplatelet agents had minimal variation, and none of these medications surpassed 5% during this period. The aspirin dose changed from 325 mg in 2012 (96.5%) to 81 mg in 2022 (98.8%). Similarly, TXA use increased from 30.8% in 2012 to 84.9% in 2022.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the past 10 years, our institution has transitioned from warfarin, UFH, and high-dose aspirin to low-dose aspirin and FXa, exhibiting acceptably low deep vein thrombosis and diminishing pulmonary embolism rates during that time.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Association of Glycemic Control Medication Regimens and Preoperative Fructosamine Among Total Joint Artrhoplasty Patients.","authors":"Eric H Tischler, Juan D Lizcano, Noam Shohat, Majd Tarabichi, Camilo Restrepo, Javad Parvizi","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) has classically been used for glycemic control screening before surgery, fructosamine, a short-term glucose variability indicator, has been reported to be a more accurate predictor of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the variability of diabetic medication management, this study aims to identify the associated effect of glycemic control medication regimen (GCMR) on the incidence rate and associated odds of abnormal preoperative fructosamine levels among diabetic primary total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2017 and 2018, consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients were identified, and the final cohort included only diabetic patients. All patients reported preoperative HbA1c and fructosamine levels. GCMR categories included insulin, metformin, and other. Independent risk of GCMR and abnormal fructosamine levels (>293 µmol/L) were identified using multivariable logistic regression, while controlling for preoperative baseline factors including HbA1C.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 420 patients, 15.7% (66/420) were diabetic, of whom 22.7% (15/66) reported an abnormal fructosamine level. Among patients requiring GCMR, 24.0% (18/75), 56.0% (42/75), and 77.7% (58/75) reported using insulin, other, and metformin, respectively. Multivariable logistic regressions demonstrated that insulin-dependent patients with DM reported a 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.096 to 30.213, P = 0.716) increased odds of abnormal fructosamine levels compared with nonactive GCMR patients, whereas patients managed with metformin and other glycemic control medications reported a protective 0.48 (95% CI, 0.418 to 5.407, P = 0.549) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.216 to 4.508, P = 0.393) decreased odds of abnormal fructosamine levels, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, insulin and other GCMR medications exhibited a trend for increased and decreased odds of having abnormal preoperative fructosamine levels while controlling for baseline HbA1c level compared with patients with DM without active GCMR. This association may be explained by multifactorial short-term glucose variability in insulin users, indicating the continued need and optimization of short-term glycemic variations instead of HbA1c.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Management and Return to Play of the Elite Athlete for Common Sports-Related Injuries About the Foot.","authors":"J Benjamin Jackson, Nicholas L Strasser, Tyler Gonzalez, Joseph Park","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Foot injuries are one of the most commonly injured areas of the body in many collegiate and professional sports. The wide range of pathology, pathophysiology, mechanisms of injury, differences in sport demands, evolution of treatment, and variable return-to-play time lines make it difficult, at times, for physicians to treat these injuries. Modern diagnostic tools, surgical treatment devices, and rehabilitation protocols have allowed for more accurate and rapid diagnosis, an improved ability to reestablish normal anatomy, and accelerated return to play for many sports-related foot injuries. This summary will provide the most up-to-date, evidence-based treatment options for common sports-related foot injuries along with the authors' preferred method of treatment and return-to-play algorithms for the elite athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Associations Between Patients' Primary Language and Outcomes and Patient Engagement Process Metrics for Total Joint Arthroplasty.","authors":"Rodnell Busigó Torres, Mateo Restrepo Mejia, Brocha Z Stern, Calin S Moucha, Jashvant Poeran, Brett L Hayden","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous research has indicated language-based disparities in outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty. In this study, we examined the relationship between primary spoken language and outcomes and patient engagement process metrics in a multihospital academic health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent elective primary total hip or knee arthroplasty in 2018 to 2022. Primary language was categorized as English, Spanish, and Other. Associations were examined between language and perioperative outcomes (same-day discharge, extended hospital length of stay, nonhome discharge, 30-day hospital returns, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day combined complications), and engagement-related metrics (preoperative joint class attendance and patient-reported outcome measure [PROM] completion). We report adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8,220 patients (7.9% Spanish and 5.1% Other non-English), we found no notable associations between language and same-day discharge, nonhome discharge, 30-day hospital returns, 90-day readmissions, or 90-day complications. Other (versus English) language was significantly associated with decreased odds of extended length of stay (OR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.76, P = 0.001). In patient engagement, Other (versus English) language was associated with significantly decreased odds of preoperative class attendance (OR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.95, P = 0.02). Spanish (versus English) primary language was significantly associated with decreased odds of preoperative and 1-year PROM completion (OR 0.34 to 0.75, P ≤ 0.001), and Other (versus English) primary language was significantly associated with decreased odds of preoperative PROM completion (OR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.73, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight language-based disparities in patient engagement metrics but comparable outcomes. Differences in findings compared with past literature may be related to institution-specific language-related support systems. There is a need for additional resources to support patients' active participation in their care, regardless of their primary spoken language.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Trends in Preoperative Outcome Measures From 2013 to 2021 in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.","authors":"Jackson S Hamersly, Evan R Deckard, R Michael Meneghini, Kevin A Sonn","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01173","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) continues to increase exponentially. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to define clinical and quality-of-life improvement and for reimbursement. Temporal trends of preoperative PROMs and specifically how COVID-19 has affected these PROMs is lacking. This study evaluated preoperative PROMs over time, whether medical factors affected preoperative PROMs, and what correlations the COVID-19 pandemic had with these trends in PROMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3,014 patients who underwent primary total hip total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed for covariates and preoperative PROMs. Commonly reported preoperative PROMs were evaluated in univariate and multivariate models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative activity level steadily increased from 2015 to 2021 for THAs and steadily increased from 2015 to 2019 for TKAs, followed by a decrease in 2020. Preoperative KOOS JR scores increased from 2016 to 2019 and then decreased in 2020 and 2021. Preoperative knee pain with level walking and climbing stairs steadily increased from 2013 to 2019, with additional increases in 2020. The COVID-19 era was significantly associated with higher activity levels for THAs, higher levels of pain with level walking, and lower KOOS JR scores. Preoperative PROM scores demonstrated correlations with postoperative PROM scores, which differed from that during the COVID era (rho range 0.105 to 0.391) at a mean of 2.0 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Surgical delays because of COVID-19 were associated with increased preoperative disability as evidenced by lower activity levels. Aside from this pandemic era, patient activity levels increased over time, indicating that modern TJA patients are more active preoperatively and likely to demand higher levels of function after surgery. Additional studies should evaluate the clinical effect of these statistically significant findings. Providers should consider the trends in preoperative PROMs over time when counseling patients on expectations after TJA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"947-954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141560291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Offset Considerations in Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Adam S Driesman, Jason M Jennings, Charlie C Yang, Douglas A Dennis","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00931","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00931","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) successfully, a surgeon must be able to place the implants in a position that will restore and duplicate the patient's baseline anatomy and soft-tissue tension. One of the critical factors is the restoration of femoral offset. It is the goal of this review to precisely define measurement of offset in THA, describe its role in hip joint biomechanics, outline alterations that can be performed intraoperatively, and explain how it can create potential pathologic states. If there is a lack of offset restoration, it can result in a host of complications, including bony impingement with pain, edge loading or prosthetic joint instability, and alterations in the muscle length-tension relationship leading to reduced motor performance. Excessive femoral offset can increase hip abductor muscle and iliotibial band tension resulting in greater trochanteric pain regardless of the surgical approach. The purpose of this review was to analyze intraoperative surgical factors, choice of prosthetic implant type and position that are required to maximize stability, and dynamic motor performance after THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"32 20","pages":"921-928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip.","authors":"Charles P Hannon, Ronald E Delanois, Sumon Nandi, Yale Fillingham","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00420","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Management of Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies examining the treatment of OA of the hip in adults (aged 18 years and older). Based on the best current available evidence, this guideline contains eight recommendations and nine options to assist orthopaedic surgeons and all qualified physicians managing patients who have been diagnosed by a trained healthcare provider with OA of the hip and are currently undergoing treatment. It is also intended to serve as an information resource for professional healthcare practitioners and developers of practice guidelines and recommendations. In addition to providing pragmatic practice recommendations, this guideline also highlights gaps in the literature and informs areas for future research and quality measure development.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1027-e1034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141089440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Femoral Head Fractures: Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes.","authors":"Nathaniel E Schaffer, Lauren Luther, Lauren M Tatman, Phillip M Mitchell","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01121","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fractures of the femoral head typically occur after high-energy trauma. Radiographs and cross-sectional imaging are used to appropriately classify and identify associated injuries or morphologic characteristics that may influence management. Identification of the radiographic and clinical hallmarks of an irreducible variant is critical to optimizing the patient's outcome. Nonsurgical treatment can be used in the setting of small, infrafoveal femoral head fractures without hip instability. When surgical treatment is indicated, an anterior (Smith-Petersen), posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck), or surgical hip dislocation approach may be used depending on injury details and surgeon preference. The purpose of this review was to summarize current evidence on femoral head fractures regarding indications, variant patterns, surgical approaches, and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"929-937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141538917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}