发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Publius: The Journal of Federalism最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Past Political Asymmetry and Present Public Opinion: How Has the Asymmetrical Federation of the EU Shaped Popular Opinion of Its Optimal Shape? 过去的政治不对称与现在的民意：欧盟的非对称联邦如何影响了公众对其最佳形态的看法？
Publius: The Journal of Federalism Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjae001
M. Moland
{"title":"Past Political Asymmetry and Present Public Opinion: How Has the Asymmetrical Federation of the EU Shaped Popular Opinion of Its Optimal Shape?","authors":"M. Moland","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjae001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Asymmetries in the formal obligations and rights afforded to sub-units are mainstays of many federations that have been extensively studied from many angles. However, we know relatively little about how these asymmetries shape views on federalism in the future. By leveraging data on differentiated integration in the European Union (EU), conceptually very similar to asymmetrical federalism, and survey data on attitudes toward the optimal future of it, I show that historical exposure to differentiated integration resulting from a bottom-up process of demands for sub-unit autonomy correlates to increased support for permanent differentiation in the future, especially among those critical of the EU. However, the opposite applies to differentiation imposed by the EU. A legacy of asymmetric federalism may thus breed opposition or support for unitary European federalism, depending on both the mode of past asymmetry that citizens have been exposed to and their views of the EU.","PeriodicalId":507126,"journal":{"name":"Publius: The Journal of Federalism","volume":"1 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139525165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Regional System under Tight-Knit Elite Rule: The Last Attempt to Introduce Decentralization in Early Italy 紧密精英统治下的地区制度：早期意大利实行权力下放的最后尝试
Publius: The Journal of Federalism Pub Date : 2024-01-14 DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjad050
Giorgio Brosio
{"title":"A Regional System under Tight-Knit Elite Rule: The Last Attempt to Introduce Decentralization in Early Italy","authors":"Giorgio Brosio","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjad050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjad050","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article discusses a regionalization project, known as Minghetti’s bill, that was presented to the Italian parliament just after the creation of the country in 1861, debated at length, and finally rejected. The bill was the most advanced point reached on the decentralization front in Italy before the Second World War. Minghetti's bill is the first example of a regional process ever brought to parliamentary discussion. It was also a precursor of other regionalization schemes, such as the creation of French regions in 1972.","PeriodicalId":507126,"journal":{"name":"Publius: The Journal of Federalism","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139530574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the Effects of Amendment Rules in Federal Systems: Australia and Switzerland Compared 评估联邦制度中修正规则的效果：澳大利亚与瑞士的比较
Publius: The Journal of Federalism Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjad044
Rahel Freiburghaus, A. Vatter
{"title":"Assessing the Effects of Amendment Rules in Federal Systems: Australia and Switzerland Compared","authors":"Rahel Freiburghaus, A. Vatter","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjad044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjad044","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The effects of formal constitutional amendment rules are still contested, yielding mixed and inconsistent findings. The key issue lies in overlooking the broader institutional context in which amending clauses are situated. This article presents a novel theoretical argument centered on the “institutional embeddedness.” Empirically, we leverage a unique, most different systems design that compares Australia and Switzerland to assess the direct and indirect effects of formal amendment clauses. Both federations implement an identical “direct-democratic model of constitutional change,” despite differences in size, the underlying societal structure, the federalism model, and form of democratic governance. Our empirical results reveal similar direct effects on minority protection, but differing indirect effects on federal dynamics differ significantly. The formal amendment rule sustains Switzerland’s decentralized federal order, while contributing to pronounced centralizing trends in Australian federalism. These findings have vital implications for constitutional design, highlighting that the specific institutional context is decisive, not just the formal amendment rule.","PeriodicalId":507126,"journal":{"name":"Publius: The Journal of Federalism","volume":"26 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139445943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States, by Christopher F. Zurn 美国分裂村：民主党分裂美国的论据》，克里斯托弗-F-祖恩著
Publius: The Journal of Federalism Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjad045
I. Somin
{"title":"Splitsville USA: A Democratic Argument for Breaking Up the United States, by Christopher F. Zurn","authors":"I. Somin","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjad045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjad045","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":507126,"journal":{"name":"Publius: The Journal of Federalism","volume":"170 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139171429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Note from the Editors 编者的话
Publius: The Journal of Federalism Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjad039
Paul Nolette, Philip Rocco
{"title":"A Note from the Editors","authors":"Paul Nolette, Philip Rocco","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjad039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjad039","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":507126,"journal":{"name":"Publius: The Journal of Federalism","volume":"54 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139174052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信