M. G. Cabanilla, Michael L Bernauer, Matthew J. Briski, Liana M. Atallah, Jason Koury, Cecilia M. Thompson, Chelsea N. Rodriguez, Bernadette Jakeman, Thomas F. Byrd
{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Dual Therapy With Ceftaroline With Vancomycin or Daptomycin Monotherapy for High-Grade or Persistent MRSA Bacteremia","authors":"M. G. Cabanilla, Michael L Bernauer, Matthew J. Briski, Liana M. Atallah, Jason Koury, Cecilia M. Thompson, Chelsea N. Rodriguez, Bernadette Jakeman, Thomas F. Byrd","doi":"10.1177/87551225241227796","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225241227796","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a serious clinical infection associated with a high risk of mortality. Dual therapy is often used in patients with persistent bacteremia. Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of vancomycin or daptomycin monotherapy with those of dual therapy with ceftaroline in high-grade or persistent MRSA bacteremia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a university teaching hospital between January 2014 and June 2021, involving adults initially treated with vancomycin or daptomycin. Patients were categorized into monotherapy and dual therapy groups. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included microbiological relapse and antibiotic-related adverse events. Results: In a group of 155 patients, 30-day mortality rates were similar between the monotherapy (23.4%) and dual therapy (22.6%) groups, with comparable microbiological relapse rates (6.5%). In inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, we found no significant association between dual therapy and mortality (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.38, 95% CI 0.64-2.41, P = 0.38) or microbiological relapse (ARR 0.95, 95% CI 0.31-2.73, P = 0.93). Dual therapy was associated with a lower risk of antibiotic-related adverse events (ARR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, P = 0.02). Infectious diseases (ID) consultation was associated with a reduced mortality risk (ARR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.95, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Dual therapy with ceftaroline did not reduce mortality risk compared with monotherapy in patients with MRSA bacteremia. However, patients with ID consultations showed a 73% reduction in mortality rates. Large-scale, prospective, and randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence regarding the potential benefits of dual therapy with ceftaroline for MRSA bacteremia.","PeriodicalId":505060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"555 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140479402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Roles of Pharmacists in the Management of Sickle Cell Disease in Adults: A Narrative Review","authors":"S. Weaver, Nkem Nonyel, Dhakrit Rungkitwattanakul","doi":"10.1177/87551225231222437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231222437","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal, recessive, genetic condition of the sickle cell genes. It affects about 100 000 people in the United States where an estimated 1 out of every 365 black children and 1 out of every 13 black children will be born with SCD and sickle cell trait, respectively. Severe and unpredictable pain crisis are the leading cause of emergency department visit for adult patients with SCD and account for 90% of inpatient hospitalizations and 85% of all acute medical care, as well as high usage of medical resources. The care of patients with SCD is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. With a few pharmacotherapeutic options to reduce SCD complications and pain episodes, the role of pharmacists in the medication management is unclear. This article aims to outline the potential role of pharmacists in SCD management. Data sources: The authors searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from January 1, 1990 to August 31, 2022, for primary literature that assessed the role of pharmacists in managing patients with SCD. Results: The authors identified relevant studies and summarized the role of pharmacists in SCD management. Conclusions: Access to comprehensive health care is essential to ensure that patients with SCD have decreased hospitalizations and good health-related quality of life. Pharmacists are an integral part of the multidisciplinary health-care team and can help patients with SCD navigate the complexities of health care. Pharmacists are medication experts who are positioned to ensure comprehensive care in the acute and chronic SCD management.","PeriodicalId":505060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139439354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}